Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T19:46:56.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Management of Amaranthus spp. in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. Vizantinopoulos and
N. Katranis
S. Vizantinopoulos
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Research Foundation, Directorate of International Relations, Documentation and Informatics, 19 Egialias Street, 151 25 Maroussi-Greece
N. Katranis
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Research Foundation, Research Experimental Station, 351 00 Vardates, Greece
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted from 1987 to 1990 to investigate the combination of cultural and chemical methods for control of Amaranthus spp. in corn. The tolerance of corn hybrids to herbicides or herbicide combinations was dependent on application rate. The early season threshold level for a mixed population of Amaranthus spp. occurred 3.5 wk after emergence. Density of Amaranthus spp. from 155 to 495 plants/m2 caused corn yield reduction of 50%. A quadratic model was derived relating percentage of yield reduction vs. duration of weed competition. The results emphasize the importance of using herbicides, cultural practices, and competition thresholds for an integrated weed control approach of Amaranthus spp. in corn.

Keywords

Tumble pigweed, Amaranthus albus # AMAALlivid amaranth, Amaranthus lividus L. # AMALIredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREcorn, Zea mays L.hybrids ‘Alexandros,’‘Ares,’‘Athina.’AMAALAMALIAMAREPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceWAE, weeks after emergence

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1998, pp. 145 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Ammon, H. U., 1986. Langfristige Unkrautbekämpfungsmanahmen und kosten in Mais-Monokultur. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society Symposium, Economic Weed Control. Spain: European Weed Res. Soc. pp. 161–168.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1988. Agricultural Programme. Athens, Attica: Ministry of Agriculture. p. 178. [In Greek]Google Scholar
Behrens, R., 1975. Corn and weeds. Weeds Today 6:15–18.Google Scholar
Berzsenyi, Z., Berenyi, G., Arendas, T., and Bonis, P. 1993. Growth analysis of corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) in competition for different periods with barnyard grass (<i>Echinochloa crusgalli</i>/L./Beauv.) and redroot pigweed (<i>Amaranthus retroflexus</i> L.). <i>In</i> Proceedings of the 8th European Weed Research Society Symposium. pp. 107–115.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. H., 1986. The concept of period thresholds. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society Symposium, Economic Weed Control. pp. 327–331.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., 1985. Assessment of the allelopathic effects of weeds on field crops in the humic midsouth. <i>In</i> The Chemistry of Allelopathy. Biochemical Interactions Among Plants. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., and Paul, R. N. 1983. Composite list of C4 weeds. Weed Sci. 31:686–692.Google Scholar
Fryer, J. D., and Matsunaka, S., eds. 1979. Integrated Control of Weeds. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. p. 261.Google Scholar
Glauninger, J., and Holzner, W. 1982. Interference between weeds and crops—a review of literature. <i>In</i> Holzner, W. and Numata, N., eds. Biology and Ecology of Weeds. The Hague, The Netherlands: W. Junk. pp. 149–159.Google Scholar
Glaze, N. C., Dowler, C. C., Johnson, A. N., and Sumner, D. R. 1984. Influence of weed control programs in intensive cropping systems. Weed Sci. 32: 762–767.Google Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (<i>Zea mays</i>). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S., and Lebaron, H. M. 1990. Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol. 4:141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. N. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126–128.Google Scholar
Pardo, A., Suso, M. L., Assemat, L., and Zaragoza, C. 1993. Weed competition in irrigated corn. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the 8th European Weed Research Society Symposium. Quantitative approaches in weed and herbicide research and their practical applications. pp. 87–91.Google Scholar
Vizantinopoulos, S., 1988. Field evaluation of selective herbicides for weed control in corn. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the XVIII Hungagrochem. Keszthely, Hungary. NEVIKI. pp. 114–119.Google Scholar
Vizantinopoulos, S., and Katranis, N. 1993. Soil solarization in Greece. Weed Res. 33:225–230.Google Scholar
Vizantinopoulos, S., and Katranis, N. 1994. Integrated weed control management in soybeans (<i>Glycine max</i>) in Greece. Weed Technol. 8:541–546.Google Scholar
Zanin, G., Cantele, A., and Toniolo, L. 1986. Indices de l'analyse de croissance et étude de la concurrence des mauvaises herbes dans le mais. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society Symposium, Economic Weed Control. pp. 153–160.Google Scholar
Zaragoza, C., Ochoa, J., Gonzalez Andujar, J. L., Sopena, J. M., and Aibar, J. 1986. Competition between weeds and corn grown in an irrigated field in the Ebro Valley (Spain). <i>In</i> Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society Symposium, Economic Weed Control, pp. 161–168.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L., 1980. Weed–crop competition. A review. International Plant Protection Center. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. pp. 46–49.Google Scholar