Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:32:42.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flame Cultivation for Corn and Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ellery L. Knake,
Fred W. Slife and
Robert D. Seif
Ellery L. Knake
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana
Fred W. Slife
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana
Robert D. Seif
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana
Get access

Abstract

During a 2-year study corn exhibited relatively good tolerance to flaming at a speed of 4 mph. Soybeans were more susceptible to injury by flaming at early growth stages than was corn. For weed control conventional cultivation and preemergence herbicides were superior to flaming. Damage to crop or weeds was influenced by morphology of the plant, size of plant, adjustment of equipment, number of flamings, and speed or length of exposure.

This study suggests that flame cultivation would not be very competitive in areas where preemergence herbicides and conventional cultivation give satisfactory control of weeds. Although cost of gas would be about equal to cost of herbicide, cost of flame cultivation equipment is about five times greater, and flame cultivation would require 2 to 4 more trips over the field. Flame cultivation may have more potential in the drier areas where preemergence herbicides have been less effective.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1965, pp. 52 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Bar, H. T. 1947. Flame cultivation. Louisiana Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 415.Google Scholar
2. Camery, M. P., and Weber, C. R. 1953. Effects of simulated hail injury on soybeans and corn. Iowa Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. 400.Google Scholar
3. Cruz, S. R., Miguel, B. G., Jumalon, F., and Blanco, D. T. 1959. Experiments on weeding by flame. Araneta J. Agr. 6(1)51–57.Google Scholar
4. Holstun, J. T. Jr., Wooten, O. B. Jr., McWhorter, C. G. and Crowe, G. B. 1960. Weed control practices, labor requirments and costs in cotton production. Weeds 8:232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Price, Dale, and Longnecker, T. C. 1961. The use of flame to control weeds in row crops. Report No. 16 High Plains Research Foundation, Plainview, Texas.Google Scholar
7. Reece, F. N., Fitzgerald, L. W., and Larson, G. H. 1962. The use of flame cultivator in corn production. Proc. NCWCC 19:71.Google Scholar
8. Williams, J. L., Albrecht, K. J., and Liljedahl, J. B. 1962. Flame cultivation of corn in Indiana. Proc. NCWCC 19:17.Google Scholar
9. Williamson, E. B., Wooten, O. B., and Fulgham, F. E. 1956. Flame cultivation. Mississippi State College Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 545.Google Scholar