Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:17:28.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Medusahead Problem in Idaho

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Paul J. Torell,
Lambert C. Erickson and
Robert H. Haas
Paul J. Torell
Affiliation:
Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station, Parma, Idaho
Lambert C. Erickson
Affiliation:
Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station, Moscow, Idaho
Robert H. Haas
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Twin Falls, IdahoDepartment of Range and Forestry, Texas A. and M. College, College Station, Texas
Get access

Extract

Medusahead, Elymus caput-medusae L., is currently the worst range weed in Idaho. It has gained this distinction because of its rapid migration, its vigorous competitive nature, and its extremely low forage value. In the absence of effective control measures, the medusahead problem is becoming more acute each year. The threat that the weed poses to Idaho's livestock industry is sufficient to merit grave concern.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1961, pp. 124 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Abrams, Leroy. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States. Vol. 1. p. 248. Stanford Univ. Press. 1955.Google Scholar
2. Furbush, Paul. Control of medusahead on California ranges. Jour. For. 51:118–121. 1953.Google Scholar
3. Hironaka, M., Tisdale, E. W., and Sharp, L. A. A study of the medusahead problem in Idaho. WWCC Res. Prog. Rpt. p. 19. 1955.Google Scholar
1. Major, J. Responses of medusahead, Elymus caput-medusae L., to different planting dates. WWCC Res. Prog. Rpt. p. 29. 1958.Google Scholar
5. Major, J., McKell, C. M., and Berry, L. J. Improvement of medusahead infested rangeland. California Agric. Exp't. Sta. Ext. Serv. Leaf. 123. 1960.Google Scholar
6. McKell, C. M., Burgess, K. L., and Major, J. Herbicides on rangeland forage. Calif. Agr. 13(4):7–15. 1959.Google Scholar
7. Peck, Morton E. Invasion of exotic plants and their economic significance in Oregon. Northwest Sci. 22(3):126–131. 1948.Google Scholar
8. Sharp, L. A., Tisdale, E. W., and Hironaka, M. Viability of medusahead seed collected in Idaho. Jour. Range Mgn't. 10 (3):123–126. 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. St. John, Harold. Flora of Southeastern Washington and Adjacent Idaho. Students Book Corp. Pullman, Wn. 1937.Google Scholar