Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:02:20.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods of Evaluating Pre-emergence Herbicides for Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. T. Holstun Jr. and
C. G. McWhorter
J. T. Holstun Jr.
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Mississippi
C. G. McWhorter
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture and the Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station, Stoneville, Mississippi
Get access

Extract

The evaluation of herbicidal weed control is often difficult, time-consuming, and non-precise. Neither weed counts, weights, ratings, effects on labor requirements, nor other common methods are wholly satisfactory for general use, although most of these methods are of value for one or more specific purposes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1961, pp. 527 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Bruns, V. F. The response of certain crops to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in irrigation water. Part II. Sugar beets. Weeds 5:250–257. 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Davis, D. E., and Funderburk, H. H. Jr. Variability in susceptibility to injury by DNBP. Weeds 6:454–460. 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Davis, D. E., and Searcy, V. S. Comparative efficiency of CIPC, DNOSBP, and 1:1 mixtures of these chemicals as a pre-emergence treatment for cotton. Proc. SWC 8:99–103. 1955.Google Scholar
4. Duncan, D. B. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biom. 11:1–42. 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hyder, D. N., Sneva, F. A., Chilcote, D. O., and Furtick, W. R. Chemical control of rabbitbrush with emphasis upon simultaneous control of big sagebrush. Weeds 6:289–297. 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sheets, T. J. The comparative toxicities of our phenylurea herbicides in several soil types. Weeds 6:413–424. 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Snedecor, G. W. Statistical Methods. 5th Ed. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa. 1956.Google Scholar
8. Willard, C. J. Rating scales for weed control experiments. Weeds 6:327–328. 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar