Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T07:58:06.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Bentgrass to Siduron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Walter E. Splittstoesser and
Herbert J. Hopen
Walter E. Splittstoesser
Affiliation:
Plant Physiology, Department of Horticulture, University of Illinois, Urbana
Herbert J. Hopen
Affiliation:
Vegetable Crops, Department of Horticulture, University of Illinois, Urbana
Get access

Abstract

Five rates of 1-(2 methylcyclohexyl)-3-phenylurea (siduron) were applied to Cohansey and IaGreen cultivars of creeping bent-grass (Agrostis palustris). Siduron had no effect upon leaf respiration or photosynthesis of either cultivar. Cohansey was tolerant to 100 lb/A of siduron while top growth of IaGreen was reduced 90% at 1.5 lb/A. Siduron inhibited new root growth of the IaGreen cultivar and decreased root respiration.

Information

Type
Brief Papers
Information
Weeds , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1967, pp. 82 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1964. Differential response of corn inbreds to simazine and atrazine. Weeds 12:60–61.Google Scholar
2. Christoph, R. J. and Fisk, E. L. 1954. Responses of plants to the herbicide 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (CMU). Botan. Gaz. 116:1–14.Google Scholar
3. Cooke, A. R. 1956. A possible mechanism of action of the urea type herbicides. Weeds 4:397–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Davis, E. A. 1966. The role of starvation in fenuron injury to shrub live oak. Weeds 14:10–17.Google Scholar
5. Geoghegan, M. J. 1957. The effect of some substituted methylureas on the respiration of Chlorella vulgaris var. viridis . New Phytol. 56:71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Good, N. E. 1961. Inhibitors of the Hill reaction. Plant Physiol. 36:788–803.Google Scholar
7. Gregory, K. F. and Winter, H. C. 1965. Data reduction with constant pressure respirometers. Anal. Biochem. 11:519–531.Google Scholar
8. Hayes, J. D. 1959. Varietal resistance to spray damage in barley. Nature 183:551–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hayes, J. D., Pfeiffer, R. K., and Rana, M. S. 1965. The genetic response of barley to DDT and Barban and its significance in crop protection. Weed Res. 5:191–206.Google Scholar
10. Jagendorf, A. T. and Avron, M. 1959. Inhibitors of photosynthetic phosphorylation in relation to electron and oxygen transport pathways of chloroplasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 80:246–257.Google Scholar
11. Jagendorf, A. T. and Margulies, M. 1960. Inhibition of spinach chloroplast photosynthetic reactions by p-chlorophenyl-1,1-dimethylurea. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 90:184–195.Google Scholar
12. Lane, H. C., Baker, J. E., and Danielson, L. L. 1965. Effect of diuron on photosynthesis and photomorphogenesis of dodder seedlings. Weeds 13:371–372.Google Scholar
13. Minshall, W. H. 1954. Translocation path and place of action of 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea in bean and tomato. Can. J. Botan. 32:795–798.Google Scholar
14. Minshall, W. H. 1957. Primary place of action and symptoms induced in plants by 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 37:157–166.Google Scholar
15. Muzik, T. J., Cruzado, H. J., and Loustalot, A. J. 1954. Studies on the absorption, translocation and action of CMU. Botan. Gaz. 116:65–73.Google Scholar
16. Wessels, J. S. C. and van der Veen, R. 1956. The action of some derivatives of phenylurea and of 3-phenyl-1,1-dimethylurea on the Hill reaction. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 19:548–549.Google Scholar