Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T10:59:09.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicides and Herbicide Mixtures for Weed Control in Peanuts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ellis W. Hauser,
W. C. Shaw,
H. F. Harrison and
S. A. Parham
Ellis W. Hauser
Affiliation:
Beltsville, Maryland, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
W. C. Shaw
Affiliation:
Beltsville, Maryland, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
H. F. Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, Georgia
S. A. Parham
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, Georgia
Get access

Abstract

Comparative studies of herbicides and herbicide mixtures were conducted at Tifton, Georgia, in 1959 and 1960. Certain mixtures, which contained sodium 2,4–dichlorophenoxyethyl sulfate (sesone), tris(2,4–dichlorophenoxyethyl) phosphite (2,4–DEP), or the triethylamine salt of 3–amino–2,5–dichlorobenzoic acid (amiben) mixed with the alkanolamine salt of 4,6–dinitro–o–sec-butylphenol (DNBP), gave seasonal weed control on band-treated peanuts. Compared to herbicides applied singly, mixtures not only increased the spectrum of weeds controlled but also permitted the use of the lowest rate of each component on the weeds for which it was most effective.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 1962, pp. 139 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, J. F. 1960. Combinations of herbicides for weed control in maple tree nurseries. Proc. NEWCC 14:131–136.Google Scholar
2. Boyle, Lytton W., and Hammons, R. O. 1956. Cultural practices with respect to peanut yields and control of southern blight and root rot. Georgia Experiment Station Mimeo Series N.S. 31.Google Scholar
3. Boyle, Lytton W., Hauser, Ellis W., and Thompson, J. T. 1958. The combined effect of an herbicide and disease on the emergence of peanut seedlings. Weeds 6:461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Garren, Kenneth H. 1959. The stem rot of peanuts and its control. Virginia Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 144.Google Scholar
5. Gowing, Donald P. 1959. A method of comparing herbicides and assessing herbicide mixtures at the screening level. Weeds 7:66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hauser, E. W., and Thompson, J. T. 1960. Efficiency of selected herbicides and herbicidal mixtures for weed control in peanuts. Proc. SWC. 13:47–48.Google Scholar
7. Hay, J. R. 1961. Pre-emergence weed control in soybeans with mixtures of two herbicides. Weeds 9:117–123.Google Scholar
8. Orsenigo, J. R. 1959. The tolerance of sugar cane to pre-emergence and postemergence applied herbicides in screening experiments. Proc. SWC. 12:56.Google Scholar
9. Ries, S. K., Grigsby, B. H., and Davidson, H. 1959. Evaluation of herbicides for several species of ornamentals. Weeds 7:409–417.Google Scholar
10. Sheets, T. J., and Leonard, O. A. 1958. An evaluation of the herbicidal efficiency of combinations of ATA with dalapon, monuron, and several other chemicals. Weeds 6:143–151.Google Scholar
11. Tafuro, A. J., and Beatty, R. H. 1955. Progress report with greenhouse tests on Johnson grass seedlings using amizol (3–amino–1,2,4–triazole) as an additive with other herbicides. Proc. SWC. 8:386–391.Google Scholar
12. Thompson, Jack T., Reid, Travis, and Hauser, Ellis W. 1958. An improved sprayer for experimental field plots. WSA Abstracts, p. 12.Google Scholar