No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Must Strategy and Conscience Be Disjoined?
Review products
AnatolRapoport, Strategy and Conscience, New York, Harper and Row, 1964, 323 pp. $6.95.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
Extract
A Critique of “Theories of Rational Decision” and an exposé of “Hazards and Pitfalls of Strategic Thinking” comprise the first two and more significant Parts of Strategy and Conscience. A third Part pleads for understanding between the United States and the Soviet Union, and for “ideological disarmament”; it presents vanother mode of thinking in which conscience is central.”
Information
- Type
- Review Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1965
References
1 “Systemic and Strategic Conflict: What Happens When People Do Not Think—and When They Do,” Virginia Quarterly Review, XL (Summer 1964), 342.Google Scholar
2 New Yorker, October 10, 1964, p. 102.
3 Kaplan, Morton A., System and Process in International Politics (New York 1957), 191–244.Google Scholar
4 Rapoport, “Systemic and Strategic Conflict,” 361–65.
5 Ann Arbor, Mich., 1960.
- 1
- Cited by