¹ Roth, , “Personal Rulership, Patrimonialism, and Empire-building in the New States,” World Politics, XX (January 1968), 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² See, for example, Bill, James A. and Leiden, Carl, The Middle East: Politics and Power (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1974)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 4; Roett, Riordan, Brazil: Politics in a Patrimonial Society (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1972)Google Scholar; Willame, Jean-Claude, Patrimonialism and Political Change in the Congo (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

³ Shor, See, “The Thai Bureaucracy,” Administrative Science Quarterly, V (June 1960), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴ Roth (fn. 1), 204–6.

⁵ Heeger, , The Politics of Underdevelopment (London: Macmillan, 1974)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 3.

⁶ Heeger here cites Waterbury's, John study of Moroccan politics, Commander of the Faithful (New York: Columbia University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

⁷ Ibid., 54.

⁸ Lemarchand, René and Legg, Keith, “Political Clientelism and Development: A Preliminary Analysis,” Comparative Politics, IV (No. 2, 1972), 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ Ibid., 160.

¹⁰ See Roett (fn. 2), esp. chaps. 2 and 5.

¹¹ Crouch, , “Patrimonialism and Military Rule in Indonesia,” World Politics, XXXI (July 1979), 571–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹² I have chosen not to discuss Willame's study of patrimonialism in the Congo (fn. 2), primarily because he sees the essence of patrimonialism in its decentralized character. He thereby departs both from Weber's position and from the bulk of subsequent writing on patrimonialism. In addition to Weber's own discussion in Economy and Society (New York: Bedminster Press, 1968), III, chap. 12, see Eisenstadt, S. N., Traditional Patrimonialism and Modern Neopatrimonialism (London: Sage Publications, 1973), 15–17Google Scholar; Morse, Robert M., “The Heritage of Latin America,” in Hartz, Louis, ed., The Founding of New Societies (New York: Harcourt Brace & World, 1964), 157Google Scholar; and Trimberger, Ellen Kay, Revolution From Above (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1978), 44–45.Google Scholar

¹³ For an excellent critique of the uses of the patron-client concept, see Kaufman, Robert R., “The Patron-Client Concept and Marco-politics: Prospects and Problems,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, XIV (July 1974), 254–308.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Rudolph, Lloyd I. and Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber, “Authority and Power in Bureaucratic and Patrimonial Administration: A Revisionist Interpretation of Weber on Bureaucracy,” World Politics, XXXI (January 1979), 195–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁵ See, for example, Bendix, Reinhard, “Tradition and Modernity Re-considered,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, IX (April 1967), 292–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Gusfield, Joseph, “Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 72 (January 1967), 351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ See, for example, Mouzelis, Nicos P., Organization and Bureaucracy, An Analysis of Modern Theories (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967).Google Scholar

¹⁷ An example of patrimonialism in a modern context cited by Rudolph and Rudolph (fn. 14), 224–25.

¹⁸ Roett (fn. 2), 129.

¹⁹ See Ake, Claude, “Charismatic Legitimation and Political Integration,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, IX (October 1966), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a brief review of the main criticisms of “charisma,” see Theobald, Robin, “A Charisma too Versatile?” European Journal of Sociology, XIX (No. 1, 1978), 192–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁰ See, particularly, Dekmejian, Richard H. and Wirszomirski, Margaret J., “Charismatic Leadership in Islam: The Mahdi of the Sudan,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, XIV (March 1972), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Theobald, Robin, “The Role of Charisma in the Development of Social Movements,” Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions, XLIX, (No. 1, 1980), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²¹ See Weber (fn. 12), III, 1028–31.

²² Ibid., 968.

²³ See, for example, Tilly, Charles, ed., The Formation of National States in Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), 72–73Google Scholar; Krygier, Martin, “State and Bureaucracy in Europe; the Growth of a Concept,” in Kamenka, Eugene and Krygier, Martin, eds., Bureaucracy: The Career of a Concept (London: Edward Arnold, 1979)Google Scholar; and Anderson, Eugene N. and Anderson, Pauline, “Bureaucratic Institutionalization in Nineteenth-Century Europe,” in Heidenheimer, Arnold J., ed., Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1978), 91–105.Google Scholar

²⁴ Wertheim, “Sociological Aspects of Corruption in South Asia,” ibid., 195–291.

²⁵ See, for example, Kaldor, Nicholas, “Taxation for Economic Development,” Journal of Modern African Studies, I (No. 1, 1963), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁶ Bienen, , “The Economic Environment,” in Hyden, Goran, Jackson, Robert H., and Okumu, John H., eds., Development Administration: The Kenyan Experience (Nairobi: Oxford University Press, 1970), 59.Google Scholar

²⁷ For a useful discussion, see John J. Okumu, “The Socio-political Setting,” ibid., 25–42.

²⁸ In addition to Okumu, ibid., see Leys, Colin, “Administration Training in Kenya,” in Schaffer, Bernard, ed., Administrative Training and Development: A Comparative Study of East Africa, Zambia, Pakistan and India (London: Praeger, 1974), 161–210.Google Scholar See also Schaffer, Bernard, “Administrative Legacies and Links in the Post-colonial State: Preparation, Training and Administrative Reform,” Development and Change, IX (No. 2, 1978), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar