Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T09:14:09.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Killing the Byrd Amendment with the right stone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2004

JAGDISH BHAGWATI and
PETROS C. MAVROIDIS
JAGDISH BHAGWATI
Affiliation:
Columbia University and Council on Foreign Relations
PETROS C. MAVROIDIS
Affiliation:
University of Neuchâtel and Columbia Law School and at CEPR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

On 16 January 2003, the WTO Appellate Body issued its report on United States – Continued Dumping And Subsidy Offset Act Of 2000 (WTO Doc. WT/DS217 and 234/AB/R). In this report, the Appellate Body condemned the so-called US Byrd Amendment by finding that it was inconsistent with the US obligations under the WTO Agreements on Antidumping (AD) and Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM).

Information

Type
Snipings
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2004, pp. 119 - 127
Copyright
2004 Jagdish Bhagwati and Petros C. Mavroidis