Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:08:05.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2003

DANIEL C. ESTY
DANIEL C. ESTY
Affiliation:
Yale Law School, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

David Henderson misreads, misstates, and misunderstands my argument in The World Trade Organization's Legitimacy Crisis. He pejoratively refers to my suggestions for restoring the WTO's legitimacy as ‘radical’ no fewer than three times.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 2002, pp. 297 - 299
Copyright
© 2002 Daniel C. Esty