Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:58:26.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Small, remote and poor?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2004

ANTHONY J. VENABLES
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and CEPR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The two papers in this special issue both look at the problems that small economies face in participating in the world trading system. For Winters and Martins (W&M) small means small in population; they motivate their analysis with reference to the 82 countries with the smallest population, accounting collectively for less than 0.5% of world population. Many of these countries are also remote, making trade costly. For Mattoo and Subramanian (M&S) the focus is on countries that are small and poor; their list covers the 73 countries which each account for less than 0.05% of world imports and which also have low income. They investigate the engagement of these countries in the WTO. My comments will address both papers, although focus on W&M.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 Anthony J. Venables