Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:11:58.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Astrobiology and habitability studies in preparation for future Mars missions: trends from investigating minerals, organics and biota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2011

P. Ehrenfreund*
Affiliation:
Leiden Institute of Chemistry, PO Box 9502, 2300 Leiden, The Netherlands Space Policy Institute, Elliott School of International Affairs, Washington, DC, USA
W.F.M. Röling
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
C.S. Thiel
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, CeNTech, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany
R. Quinn
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
M.A. Sephton
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
C. Stoker
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
J.M. Kotler
Affiliation:
Leiden Institute of Chemistry, PO Box 9502, 2300 Leiden, The Netherlands
S.O.L. Direito
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Z. Martins
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
G.E. Orzechowska
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
R.D. Kidd
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
C.A van Sluis
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands
B.H. Foing
Affiliation:
ESA ESTEC, Postbus 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several robotic exploration missions will travel to Mars during this decade to investigate habitability and the possible presence of life. Field research at Mars analogue sites such as desert environments can provide important constraints for instrument calibration, landing site strategies and expected life detection targets. We have characterized the mineralogy, organic chemistry and microbiology of ten selected sample sites from the Utah desert in close vicinity to the Mars Desert Research Station (MDRS) during the EuroGeoMars 2009 campaign (organized by International Lunar Exploration Working Group (ILEWG), NASA Ames and ESA ESTEC). Compared with extremely arid deserts (such as the Atacama), organic and biological materials can be identified in a larger number of samples and subsequently be used to perform correlation studies. Among the important findings of this field research campaign are the diversity in the mineralogical composition of soil samples even when collected in close proximity, the low abundances of detectable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and amino acids and the presence of biota of all three domains of life with significant heterogeneity. An extraordinary variety of putative extremophiles, mainly Bacteria and also Archaea and Eukarya was observed. The dominant factor in measurable bacterial abundance seems to be soil porosity and lower small (clay-sized) particle content. However, correlations between many measured parameters are difficult to establish. Field research conducted during the EuroGeoMars 2009 campaign shows that the geological history and depositional environment of the region, as well as the mineralogy influence the ability to detect compounds such as amino acids and DNA. Clays are known to strongly absorb and bind organic molecules often preventing extraction by even sophisticated laboratory methods. Our results indicate the need for further development and optimization of extraction procedures that release biological compounds from host matrices to enable the effective detection of biomarkers during future sampling campaigns on Earth and Mars.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sampling sites for P-1 to P-14. The ten samples were selected to represent different geological regions and partly due to similarities to Martian features. (a) Sample site P-1 belongs to the Mancos/Tunuck Formation and shows structures that resemble gullies on Mars. (b) P-2 represents a white sand layer site from the Morrison Formation close to the MDRS habitat. (c) The P-3 sampling site is within several metres of P-2 from the Morrison Formation and close to the MDRS habitat. (d) P-5 and P-6 are two layers sampled within a few cm from a cliff in the Morrison Formation. Whereas P-5 is a brown-reddish clay-rich material, P-6 was sampled from a 10 cm green layer (turf) just above. (e) P-7 was sampled from a riverbed in Morrison Formation. (f) P-8 sampling site belongs to the Mancos Shale Formation and soils are ash-like grey material with ∼4% organic material. (g) P-10 sampling site belongs to the Mancos Shale Formation with ash-like soils and contains sulphates, clays and carbonates. (h) Sampling site P-13 belongs to the Dakota Formation that is covered with shells. Samples P-14 was taken 15 cm below the shell surface and shows very different characteristics (see text).

Figure 1

Table 1. On-site (in situ) soil kit analysis after sample collection, see also ‘Sample analysis’ and ‘Results and discussion’ sections

Figure 2

Table 2. Results from the analyses of mineralogy, organic compounds and biota for ten selected samples collected in the vicinity of the MDRS. Mineralogy as derived from XRD data (Kotler et al.2011); total organic content % (w/w)(Orzechowska et al. 2011); PAHs concentration of phenanthrene C14H10(detected in all samples) derived by liquid extraction; abundance sum of 2–3 ring PAHs obtained from SPME method and of 2–6 rings PAHs obtained from liquid extraction (LE) (Orzechowska et al.2011); amino acid concentration measured by GC-MS (Martins et al.2011); on-site PCR analysis at MDRS (Thiel et al.2011a); phylogenetic post analysis (Direito et al. 2011). We defined a biota index as sum of positive detections using power soil (PS) and fast-DNA (FDNA) technique for the three life domains (see Fig. 2)

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Variations of amino acids and biota as a function of clay mineral percentage are displayed (data taken from Table 2). The amino acid concentrations AA in ppb show a large range from the sensitivity limit up to 1 00 000 ppb and are represented as log AA (or by log AA=0 when not detected). The biota detection is quantified by a Biota Index (from 0 to 6) adding each positive detection (+) of separate kingdoms (Bacteria, Eukarya and Archaea) using the two techniques, Power Soil and Fast-DNA (sum of + in three right columns in Table 2). The predominant detection of biota and amino acids occur in the mineral range with 9–20% clay. The sample with 1% clay (log AA=4.2) is a subsurface sample obtained at 15 cm depth (P-14). P-14 shows no detectable biota, but may have been contaminated by amino acids from the upper surface, as it was collected just below surface sample P-13 (highest in amino acids, log AA=5) (Martins et al.2011). Geological history and clay composition influences the abundance of intrinsic organics and the extraction capability of organic and biological compounds (see ‘Results and discussion’ and ‘Astrobiology field research in support of future Mars missions’ sections).

Figure 4

Table 3. Soil core locations and parameters of the subsurface DOMEX campaign (Stoker et al.2011). The subsurface samples were collected in a subsequent campaign from the three geological units within the MDRS area. These samples are related in geological context and regional area to samples P-1 to P-14. Similarities are evidenced by the higher organic content of Mancos Shale soils. Both S and P series samples do not show a correlation of microbial numbers and diversity with either organic content or mineralogy, see ‘Results and discussion’ section

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Critical aspects and constraints for organic and life detection on Mars.