Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T07:37:02.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resveratrol supplementation prior to and during pregnancy in obese rats improves mammary gland maturation, milk composition and offspring metabolism in a sex-specific manner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2026

Claudia Janet Bautista
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
Luis Antonio Reyes-Castro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
Sara Montaño
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutrición Animal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
Victoria Ramirez Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutrición Animal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
Paul D. Taylor
Affiliation:
King’s College London School of Medical Education, UK
Elena Zambrano*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
*
Corresponding author: Elena Zambrano; Email: elena.zambranog@incmnsz.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Content of image described in text.

Maternal obesity delays mammary gland maturation, influencing milk composition and neonatal growth. This study investigated whether supplementation of obese rats with resveratrol (Res) improves mammary gland differentiation, milk composition and offspring development. Female Wistar rats were fed either a high-fat diet to induce maternal obesity (MO) or standard chow as control (C). One month before mating, and throughout gestation, half the rats received 20 mg/kg/day Res orally creating two additional experimental groups (CRes and MORes). Milk nutrients and fatty acids were analysed at postnatal day 21 (PND21); maternal body composition, mammary gland weight and fat pad weight were also obtained. Mammary gland morphology and indices of apoptosis were determined. Offspring metabolic parameters were studied at PND36. MO s had increased adiposity, mammary gland weight and showed elevated glucose, TAG and cholesterol levels compared with controls. MORes reduced all these parameters except mammary gland weight. Mammary gland development was delayed and apoptosis increased in MO v. C. Res improved mammary gland development in obese dams. Milk protein/fat ratio, milk, protein and DHA intake decreased in the MO group compared with C; whereas, fat, saturated fat, monosaturated fat and ω-6 fatty acid were increased in MO. Reveratrol treatment restored these parametes in obese dams and significantly reduced adiposity in their offspring. TAG, insulin and HOMA-IR increased in MO offspring but was prevented by Res, which also increased milk intake in controls. In conclusion, preconceptional Res supplementation protects against the negative effects of maternal obesity on mammary gland differentiation, milk composition and offspring metabolism.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Maternal diet compositionTable 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Experimental design. Consumption of two experimental diets and resveratrol (Res) supplementation. Female rats were fed a control diet (C = Lab Rodent Diet 5001, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or an obesogenic diet (MO = maternal obesity 20 % lard + 5 % vegetable oil) during growth (21–120 day of life) and pregnancy and lactation. At PND 90, females were divided into four groups for Res intervention (Do = 20 mg/kg.day) and identified as C, CRes, MO and MORes (n 5–6). After weaning pups were fed with a C diet until PND 36 and identified with the same maternal group.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Figure 2 long description.(a) Maternal body weight (g) and (b) total fat content (g), (c) MG weight (g), (d) MG weight relative to body weight, (e) percentage of parenchymal area (%) in MG, (f) percentage of fat area (%) in MG, (g) MG micrograph at 20×- (blue arrows point to parenchymal and red adipose tissue). Female rats were fed a control diet (C = Lab Rodent Diet 5001, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or an obesogenic diet (MO = maternal obesity 20 % lard + 5 % vegetal oil) during growth (21–120 day of life) and pregnancy and lactation. At PND 90, females were divided into four groups for Res intervention (Do = 20 mg/kg.day) and identified as C, CRes, MO and MORes (n. 5–6). (h) Male and (j) female pups body weight and (i) male and (k) female total fat content (g) at PND 36. After weaning (PND 21), pups were fed with a control diet until PND 36 and identified with the same maternal group. Data are mean ± sem, two-way ANOVA, *P < 0.05 for diet effect between C and MO or CRes and MORes; P < 0.05 for effect of Res, different letters between C and Cres or MO and MORes. #P < 0.05 v. male; I: interaction between maternal diet and Res supplementation; n.s. not significant.

Figure 3

Table 2. Maternal serum metabolic parameters at 21 dL and offspring metabolic parameters at PND 36.Female rats were fed a control diet (C = Lab Rodent Diet 5001, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or with an obesogenic diet (MO= maternal obesity 20 % lard + 5 % vegetal oil) during growth (21–120 day of life) and pregnancy and lactation. At PND 90 females were divided in four groups for Res intervention (Do = 20 mg/kg.day) and identified as C, CRes, MO and MORes (n=5-6). After weaning pups were fed with a C diet until PND 36 and identified with the same maternal group. * p < 0.05 for Diet Effect between C and MO or CRes and MORes; abTreatment Effect for the effect of Res, different letters between C and Cres or MO and MORes indicates p < 0.05. I:p = interaction between maternal diet and Res supplementation. #p < 0.05 v. male; n.s. not significantTable 2 long description.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Figure 3 long description.Maternal mammary gland (MG) morphology at 21 dL. (a) Cytoplasm area (µm2), (b) Nuclei size (µm2), (c) MG micrograph 100×, staining with hematoxylin and eosin; (d) MG % staining area IL-6, (e) MG micrograph with IL-6 and contra staining with hematoxylin 40X. Female rats were fed with a control diet (C = Lab Rodent Diet 5001, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or with an obesogenic diet (MO = maternal obesity 20 % lard + 5 % vegetal oil) during growth (21–120 day of life) and pregnancy and lactation. At PND 90, females were divided into four groups for Res intervention (Do = 20 mg/kg.day) and identified as C, CRes, MO and MORes (n 5–6). Data are mean ± sem, two-way ANOVA, *P < 0.05 for effect of diet between C and MO or CRes and MORes; P < 0.05 for effect of Res, different letters between C and CRes or MO and MORes; I: interaction between maternal diet and Res supplementation.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Maternal MG TUNEL at 21 dL. (a) Quantitative analysis of MG apoptotic cells (% positive TUNEL cells per field) and micrographs 20× (b1) apoptotic cells in green Alexa Flour 488 ®, (b2) nuclei were stained with DAPI in blue and (b3) Merge images with arrows point the positive TUNEL cells in yellow. Female rats were fed with a control diet (C = Lab Rodent Diet 5001, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or with an obesogenic diet (MO = maternal obesity 20 % lard + 5 % vegetal oil) during growth (21–120 days of life) and pregnancy and lactation. At PND 90, females were divided into four groups for Res intervention (Do = 20 mg/kg.day) and identified as C, CRes, MO and MORes (n 5–6). Data are mean ± sem, two-way ANOVA, *P < 0.05 for the effect of diet between C and MO or CRes and MORes; P < 0.05 for the effect of Res, different letters between C and CRes or MO and MORes; I: interaction between maternal diet and Res supplementation.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Figure 5 long description.Maternal proliferation index. (a) Quantitative MG proliferating cells (% PCNA positive cells per field) and micrographs 40× (b1) proliferating cells Alexa fluor 594 ®, (b2) nuclei were stained with DAPI in blue and (b3) merge images with arrows pointing the positive proliferating cells in pink. Female rats were fed with a control diet (C = Lab Rodent Diet 5001, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or with an obesogenic diet (MO = maternal obesity 20 % lard + 5 % vegetal oil) during growth (21–120 days of life) and pregnancy and lactation. At PND 90, females were divided into four groups for Res intervention (Do = 20 mg/kg.day) and identified as C, CRes, MO and MORes (n 5–6). Data are mean ± sem, two-way ANOVA, I: interaction between maternal diet and Res.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Milk composition and milk intake from offspring. (a) Water content in milk, (b) protein/fat content ratio, (c and d) protein and fat content respectively, (e) maternal milk production, (f) offspring milk intake, (g and h) protein and fat offspring milk intake. Female rats were fed with a control diet (C = Lab Rodent Diet 5001, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or with an obesogenic diet (MO = maternal obesity 20 % lard + 5 % vegetal oil) during growth (21–120 days of life) and pregnancy and lactation. At PND 90, females were divided into four groups for Res intervention (Do = 20 mg/kg.day) and identified as C, CRes, MO and MORes (n 5–6). Data are mean ± sem, two-way ANOVA, *P < 0.05 for the effect of diet between C and MO or CRes and MORes; P < 0.05 for the effect of Res, different letters between C and CRes or MO and MORes; I: interaction between maternal diet and Res supplementation; n.s. not significant.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Figure 7 long description.Milk composition. (a) Fatty acid content in the milk, (b) offspring fatty acids intake (b1) AA intake, (b2) EPA intake (b3) DHA intake (b4) AA/EPA+DHA intake. Female rats were fed with a control diet (C = Lab Rodent Diet 5001, Fort Worth, TX, USA) or with an obesogenic diet (MO = maternal obesity 20 % lard + 5 % vegetal oil) during growth (21–120 days of life) and pregnancy and lactation. At PND 90, females were divided in four groups for Res intervention (Do = 20 mg/kg/day) and identified as C, CRes, MO and MORes (n 5–6). Data are mean ± sem, two-way ANOVA, *P < 0.05 for the effect of diet between C and MO or CRes and MORes; P < 0.05 for the effect of Res, different letters between C and CRes or MO and MORes; I: interaction between maternal diet and Res supplementation; n.s. not significant.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Maternal and offspring Res supplementation prior and during pregnancy on the maternal obesity model. Improve: MORes ≠ to MO; Restore MORes = C.