Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:53:44.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect on sperm quality of different cryoprotectants in sperm of Chinchilla lanigera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2012

M.C. Gramajo-Bühler*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco 461, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.
F. Pucci-Alcaide
Affiliation:
Fundación Miguel Lillo Instituto de Morfología Aninal IMA, Miguel Lillo 251, San Miguel de Tucumán 4000, Tucumán, Argentina.
G. Sánchez-Toranzo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo INSIBIO, Chacabuco 461, San Miguel de Tucumán 4000, Tucumán, Argentina.
*
All correspondence to: María Cecilia Gramajo-Bühler. Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco 461, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina. Tel: +54 381 4247752 int. 7093. Fax: +54 381 4247752 int. 7004.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Chinchilla lanigera is an endangered species therefore the development of cryopreservation protocols for its gametes is a useful tool in the application of assisted reproduction techniques. A study of the functionality of the spermatozoa punctured from the cauda epididymis was performed on fresh or frozen–thawed samples with three cryoprotective media (test-yolk buffer, sucrose and glycerol). The effect that these media had on sperm physiology during the freezing, storage and later thawing process was analysed. A decrease in the percentages of viability, motility, membrane integrity and capacity to undergo the induced acrosome reaction was found with all the media assayed, an increase in the percentages of DNA fragmentation was also observed. The comparative analysis of the effect of the different cryoprotectants assayed showed that the best medium to use to cryopreserve epididymal sperm in this species is test-yolk buffer. This medium had the least effect on the abovementioned physiological parameters, especially at the level of genetic material.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Effect of different cryoprotectants on sperm viability. TYB (test-yolk buffer), S (sucrose) and G (glycerol 6%). Results represent the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five independent experiments performed in duplicate and 200 cells assayed per sample with eosin test. Determinations were performed immediately after thawing.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Effect of different cryoprotectants on sperm motility. PM (progressive motility), NM (non-progressive motility), IM (immotility) TYB (test-yolk buffer), S (sucrose) and G (glycerol 6%). Results represent the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five independent experiments performed in duplicate and 200 cells assayed per sample. Determinations were performed immediately after thawing.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Swollen sperm after the hypo-osmotic shock (HOS) test. Arrows indicate sites of swelling in the tail. Methylene blue was used to increase contrast. Inverted microscopy ×1000 magnification.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Percentages of positive responses to the hypo-osmotic shock of fresh and frozen–thawed sperm. TYB (test-yolk buffer), S (sucrose) and G (glycerol 6%). Results represent the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of seven independent experiments performed in duplicate and 100 cells assayed per sample. Determinations were performed immediately after thawing.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Detection of acrosomal loss in capacitated spermatozoa from the epididymis cauda by modified Papanicolaou staining. Arrows: presence of intact acrosome. Arrowhead: reacted acrosome. Inverted microscopy ×1000 magnification.

Figure 5

Figure 6 Percentages of acrosome reaction-induced with progesterone 20 μM incapacitated sperm. Incubated for 50 min at 37°C. Control (dimethyl sulfoxide) has a percentage of spontaneous acrosome reaction (AR). TYB (test-yolk buffer), S (sucrose) and G (glycerol 6%). Results represent the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five independent experiments performed in duplicate and 200 cells assayed per sample.

Figure 6

Figure 7 Effect of the cryoprotectants assayed on the integrity of spern DNA. TYB (test-yolk buffer), S (sucrose) and G (glycerol 6%). Results represent the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of six independent experiments performed in duplicate and 100 cells assayed per sample.

Figure 7

Figure 8 Sperm stained with acridine orange. (arrows) Green fluorescence: undamaged DNA; (cut line) yellow-red fluorescence: DNA with different degrees of fragmentation. Epifluorescence microscope ×1000 magnification. (See online for a colour version of this figure.)