Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-7drmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T23:07:37.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of agarose gel support system and conventional methods for in vitro culture of bovine preantral follicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2026

Camila Bizarro da Silva
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction - Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil Animal Reproduction Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Brazil
Larissa Zamparone Bergamo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction - Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil
Marcela Bortoletto Cerezzetti
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction - Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil
Rafaela Schoma Cardoso
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction - Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil
Miriam Nagashima Hohmann
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Department of Pathological Sciences; Biological Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil
Waldiceu A. Verri Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Pathological Sciences; Biological Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil
Mateus José Sudano
Affiliation:
Center for Natural and Human Sciences, Universidade Federal do ABC, Brazil Department of Genetics and Evolution, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil
Marcelo Marcondes Seneda*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction - Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Marcelo Marcondes Seneda; Email: marcelo.seneda@uel.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluated the efficiency of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) systems for in vitro culture of preantral follicles from the bovine species. Ovarian cortex fragments were obtained from a local slaughterhouse and randomly distributed into four groups: i) standard culture, directly on a culture plate (2D), ii) supported culture, on a gel monolayer (2D), iii) immersed culture on agarose gel (plating coated) covered in a medium (3D) and iv) Millicell–Biopore culture (3D), tested at 6 or 14 days. The following parameters were evaluated: follicular morphology and morphometry, reactive oxygen species production and granulosa cell proliferation. After 6 days of culture, follicles cultured on a gel monolayer (2D) showed a higher proportion of intact follicles than those cultured using other methods (P < 0.05). After 14 days of growth, standard culture on a culture plate (2D) and supported culture on a gel monolayer (2D) had a higher percentage of morphologically intact follicles (P < 0.05) than the 3D culture. An assessment of the redox status revealed that superoxide anion levels and antioxidant capacity of the samples cultured using the four methods were lower than those of the control group (non-cultured; P < 0.05). Taken together, these findings suggest that the agarose gel support system offers distinct advantages for bovine preantral follicle culture by maintaining morphological integrity and stabilising the redox environment, although further studies incorporating functional endpoints are warranted to fully confirm these observations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Experimental design. In vitro culture of control bovine preantral follicles (MEM) with different culture methods (standard culture, agarose gel-supported culture, medium-immersed agarose gel culture and Millicell–Biopore culture).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Histological photomicrograph of the morphology of bovine preantral follicles (Bos taurus indicus). Whole primordial follicle (A), whole primary follicle (arrow) (B), whole secondary follicle (C) and degenerated primordial follicle (D). Periodic acid Schiff (PAS) and haematoxylin stains, 40× and 100×.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Percentage of intact preantral (primordial, primary + secondary) follicles in non-cultured ovarian tissue (control, day 0) and after in vitro culture using different culture methods (standard culture, agarose gel-supported culture, culture agarose gel immersed in medium and cultivated Millicell–Biopore) for 6 or 14 days. *Compared with the control group. A, B Indicate differences among treatments within 6 days. a, b Indicate differences among treatments within 14 days (P < 0.05).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Percentages of intact and degenerate follicles according to the stage of development. Intact primordial (A), intact developing (B), degenerated primordial (C) and degenerated developing (D) preantral follicles in non-cultured ovarian tissue (Control, day 0) and after in vitro culture with different follicular culture methods (standard culture, culture on agarose gel support, medium-immersed agarose gel culture and Millicell–Biopore culture) for 6 or 14 days. *Indicates differences between 6 days and 14 days. # Indicates differences between control and other treatments (except in comparison with agarose support at B and D). a, b Indicate differences among treatments within 6 days. A, B Indicate differences among treatments within 14 days.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Average oocyte (A) and follicle (B) diameter in micrometers (μm) of bovine preantral follicles grown for 6 or 14 days under different in vitro culture methods (standard culture, agarose gel support culture, culture with agarose gel immersed in the medium and Millicell–Biopore culture). A, B Indicate differences among treatments within 6 days. a, b Indicate differences among treatments within 14 days (P < 0.05).

Figure 5

Table 1. Qualitative analysis of granulosa cells of preantral follicles marked (stained-brown) with AgNOR (nucleophilic organising regions related to argyrophilic proteins) present in the control cells or in those cultured using different methods (standard culture, culture on agarose gel support, medium-immersed agarose gel culture and Millicell-Biopore culture) – % (n/t)Table 1 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Photomicrograph of cell proliferation for NOR quantification of bovine preantral follicles (Bos taurus indicus). (A) NOR-labelled primordial follicle and (B) positive granulosa cells (black arrow) AgNOR. 40× and 100×.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Effects of different culture methods (standard culture, agarose gel-supported culture, medium-immersed agarose gel culture and Millicell–Biopore culture) on oxidative stress during the culture of preantral follicles in ovarian tissue at D6. (A) Free radical scavenging capacity (ABTS) and (B) ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) were compared with a Trolox curve. Superoxide anion production (C), reduced glutathione quantification (D) and lipid peroxidation (E) were determined by NBT, GSH and TBARS tests, respectively. Samples were collected after 6 days of in vitro culture. *Compared with the control group. A, B Indicate differences among treatments (P < 0.05).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Effects of different culture methods (standard culture, agarose gel-supported culture, medium-immersed agarose gel culture and Millicell–Biopore culture) on oxidative stress during the culture of preantral follicles in ovarian tissue at D14. (A) Free radical scavenging capacity (ABTS) and (B) ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) were compared with a Trolox curve. Superoxide anion production (C), reduced glutathione quantification (D) and lipid peroxidation (E) were determined by NBT, GSH and TBARS tests, respectively. Samples were collected after fourteen days of in vitro culture. *Compared with the control group. A, B Indicate differences among treatments (P < 0.05).