Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:43:52.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does age matter? Echocardiographic assessment after isolated atrial septal defect surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2025

Kenan Öztürker*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey
Hakan Ceyran
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey
Veysel Başar
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Surgery, TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey
Ayhan Güneş
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Surgery, TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey
Mustafa Akbbulut
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Surgery, TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey
Abdullah Urve Köksal
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Surgery, Ümraniye Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Kenan Öztürker; Email: kenanozturker@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Atrial septal defect is the second most common CHD in adults. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between age and early postoperative changes in cardiac function—including right ventricular function, tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary artery pressure, mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction—in adult patients undergoing surgical atrial septal defect repair.

Methods:

This retrospective study included 214 patients aged 16–65 years who underwent isolated atrial septal defect repair between 2014 and 2024. Patients were divided into five age groups. Echocardiographic parameters were compared at three time points: preoperative, 1-month, and 6-month postoperative.

Results:

Of the patients, 60.7% were female. A significant postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction decrease was observed only in the 56–65 age group. Preoperative tricuspid regurgitation severity and pulmonary artery pressure values increased with age, but both showed significant postoperative improvement across all age groups. Postoperative pulmonary artery pressure reduction was most prominent in the youngest and oldest groups. Mitral regurgitation was mildly increased in all groups, without progression to moderate severity. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion values, inversely correlated with age, decreased in younger patients postoperatively but improved in older patients, indicating enhanced right ventricular function after volume unloading.

Conclusion:

Surgical atrial septal defect repair leads to early improvement in several cardiac parameters. However, the benefit is more pronounced in younger patients. These findings support early surgical intervention to preserve right ventricular function and prevent long-term complications, particularly in asymptomatic adults.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Distribution of EF measurements by age groups.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Distribution of TR measurements by age groups.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Distribution of PAP measurements by age groups.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Distribution of MR measurements by age groups.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Distribution of TAPSE measurements by age groups.

Figure 5

Table 1. Mean Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by Age Group and Time Point

Figure 6

Table 2. Pairwise comparisons of EF by age and time

Figure 7

Table 3. Mean tricuspid regurgitation (TR) by age group and time point

Figure 8

Table 4. Pairwise comparisons of TR by age and time

Figure 9

Table 5. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) by age group and time point

Figure 10

Table 6. Pairwise comparisons of PAP by age and time

Figure 11

Table 7. Mean mitral regurgitation (MR) by age group and time point

Figure 12

Table 8. Pairwise comparisons of MR by age and time

Figure 13

Table 9. Mean TAPSE by age group and time point

Figure 14

Table 10. Pairwise comparisons of TAPSE by age and time