Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:22:35.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Satisfaction With Economic and Social Rights and Quality of Life in a Post-Disaster Zone in China: Evidence From Earthquake-Prone Sichuan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2015

Ying Liang*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work and Social Policy, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Peoples Republic of China.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Ying Liang, Department of Social Work and Social Policy, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023 Peoples Republic of China (e-mail: njulucy66@163.com).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study explored the influence of satisfaction with economic and social rights (ESR) on the quality of life (QOL) of people in post-disaster zones in Sichuan, China.

Methods

Data from a survey conducted in 2013 in the 5 hardest hit counties in the earthquake-prone area of Sichuan were used. QOL was measured by use of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). Structural equation models were developed to determine the specific features of the influence of satisfaction with ESR on QOL.

Results

The mean values of both the WHOQOL-BREF scale and the ESR satisfaction scale were lower than the midpoint of the scales. Satisfaction with ESR had a significant effect on psychological health, social relationships, and environment, apart from physical health. Satisfaction with the right to food had the greatest effect on QOL, followed by the rights to education, work, health, social security, and housing.

Conclusions

Satisfaction with ESR had a significant positive influence on the QOL of people in a post-disaster zone, particularly satisfaction with the right to food. Policies on food and education guarantees and mental health intervention are highlighted. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:111-118)

Information

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 
Figure 0

TABLE 1 Descriptive Statistics of the WHOQOL-BREF and Satisfaction With ESR Scales

Figure 1

TABLE 2 Reliability Test Results of the WHOQOL-BREF and Satisfaction With ESR Scales

Figure 2

TABLE 3 Correlation Coefficients of the Four Domains of the WHOQOL-BREF Scale

Figure 3

FIGURE 1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Brief Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). Note: Q1 to Q24 indicate the 24 items of the WHOQOL-BREF. Q1, Pain and discomfort; Q2, dependence on medicinal substances and medical aids; Q3, positive feelings; Q4, spirituality/religion/personal beliefs; Q5, thinking, learning, memory and concentration; Q6, freedom, physical safety, and security; Q7, physical environment (pollution/noise/traffic/climate); Q8, energy and fatigue; Q9, bodily image and appearance; Q10, financial resources; Q11, opportunities for acquiring new information and skills; Q12, participation in and opportunities for recreation/leisure activities; Q13, mobility; Q14, sleep and rest; Q15, activities of daily living; Q16, work capacity; Q17, self-esteem; Q18, personal relationships; Q19, sexual activity; Q20, social support; Q21, home environment; Q22, health and social care: accessibility and quality; Q23, transport; Q24, negative feelings; e1 to e24 indicate the errors of the 24 items.

Figure 4

FIGURE 2 Road Map of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models.

Figure 5

FIGURE 3 Structural Equation Modeling.

Figure 6

TABLE 4 Results of the Structural Equation Modeling