Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T17:40:50.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation Processes of Ice Fabric Pattern in Ice Sheets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

N. Azuma
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 060
A. Higashi
Affiliation:
Division of Natural Sciences, International Christian University, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, Japan 181
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental studies on the Formation process of the single maximum fabric of ice from its random fabric were carried out using both Greenland Dye-3 ice cores and artificially grown polycrystalline ice. From the observations of the rotation of c-axes of individual grains in thin specimens, an empirical equation was obtained for describing the rotation process of c-axes. Combined with another empirical equation on the relationship between the uniaxial strain of whole specimen and the uniaxial strain in individual grains of different c-axis direction, an equation was derived which describes the formation of single maximum fabric in bulk ice samples.

Computer simulation of the formation process was performed based on an equation starting from an artificially made random fabric pattern. From the results obtained by a stepwise simulation of 2% strain intervals, the degree of concentration expressed by θm, the angle which halves the number of grains in the fabric diagram is correlated with the accumulated strain in bulk ice (Fig. 8). The strain deduced by applying this relationship to the obtained θm for samples of Dye-3 ice core coincided well with actual strain which the samples had experienced. This implies that the equation is valid and the mechanism of c-axis rotation prevails in polar ice sheets.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1985
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Photographs of a thin specimen through crossed polaroids during compressive deformation test no. 2. Axial strain for each is: 1) 0%, 2) 3.4%, 3) 6.5%, 4) 10.0%, 5) 11.5%, 6) 12.4%. Compression axis is in the top and bottom direction of the figure.

Figure 1

Table 1.

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Changes of the misorientation angle x with increasing strain ε. Several grains of different initial angle x0 are designated by different symbols. Solid lines show the relationship x vs. ε by the equation 3.

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Change of the nearly random fabric of Dye-3 core no.120 a) before the compression test, b) after test no. 5, c) after test no.6, and d) the simulated fabric diagram by equation 4, starting from a) and strained 10%. The center of each diagram coincides with the compression axis.

Figure 4

Fig. 4.Cumulative fraction F(θ) curve for the fabrics of Dye-3 #120 before the test (----- ), after test S (- - - ) and test 6 ( . . . ).

Figure 5

Fig. 5.Relationship between the unixaial compressive strain εg of individual grains which had initial misorientotior. angle X0 after a certain total strain, 3% and 7%. Solid lines show equation 2.

Figure 6

Fig. 6.Simulated fabric diagrams started from artificially made random fabric with various degrees of uniaxial compressive strain. The compressive axis is in the center of each diagram.

Figure 7

Fig. 7.F(θ) - θ curve for the simulated fabrics shown in Fig. 6.

Figure 8

Fig. 8.Relationship between the median inclination θm and the vertical strain for the Dye-3 core ice and specimens of compression tests. The solid line shows the strain dependence of θm obtained from results of simulated fabrics.