Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:34:42.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geochronology and geochemistry of Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan, South China: implications for petrogenesis and post-orogenic extension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2007

XIAO-LEI WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, PR China
JIN-CHENG ZHOU*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, PR China
JIAN-SHENG QIU
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, PR China
SHAO-YONG JIANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, PR China
YU-RUO SHI
Affiliation:
Beijing SHRIMP Center, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100026, PR China
*
†Author for correspondence: j.c.zhou@public1.ptt.js.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Neoproterozoic mafic rocks in western Hunan, South China, form a NNE-striking mafic rock belt for which outcrops are found predominantly in Guzhang, Qianyang and Tongdao. Samples from Qianyang and Tongdao yielded ion microprobe U–Pb zircon ages of 747±18 Ma and 772±11 Ma, respectively. The mafic rocks are geochemically divided into two subtypes. Ultramafic rocks from Tongdao are depleted in Nb and Ti, with decoupled Nd–Hf isotopes, and geochemical features similar to the c. 761 Ma mafic–ultramafic rocks from Longsheng, northern Guangxi. Their εNd(t) value is −2.91, implying an enriched mantle source. Alkaline mafic rocks from Qianyang and Guzhang have high values of TiO2, total alkali, some high field strength elements and (La/Yb)N, and low Zr/Nb, La/Nb, Sm/Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratios as well as coupled Nd–Hf isotopes. They are geochemically similar to ocean island basalts and show fractional crystallization of Fe–Ti oxides, olivine and pyroxene in the mafic magma. The c. 760 Ma mafic rocks in western Hunan may be the products of post-orogenic magmatism. After the Jinningian (Sibao) orogenic process, the upwelling of the deep asthenospheric mantle caused by the break-off and detachment of the subducted oceanic slab led to extension in the area. The extension might have taken place earlier in the Tongdao and Longsheng areas, which led to the partial melting of the lithospheric mantle that had been metasomatized during early oceanic subduction to generate a relatively large amount of sub-alkaline rocks. However, the less alkaline mafic rocks in Qianyang and Guzhang might have been generated in the relatively later stage of the extension, and may have resulted from a small degree of partial melting of the asthenospheric mantle.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geological sketch maps of western Hunan, South China (modified after HRGST, 1965; Zheng et al. 2001; Ma et al. 2002 and Wang et al. 2004b). (a) South China; (b) Hunan Provinces, with the dashed rectangle indicating the western Hunan area; (c) Qianyang; (d) Guzhang.

Figure 1

Table 1. Representative mineral compositions of clinopyroxenes (Py) and plagioclases (Pl) in the mafic rocks from western Hunan

Figure 2

Table 2. Ion microprobe U–Th–Pb data for zircons from mafic rocks of Qianyang and Guzhang, western Hunan

Figure 3

Figure 2. SHRIMP U–Pb zircon concordia plots and recalculated weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages for the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan. (a) QY-2, from Qianyang; (b) 05TD-3–3, from Tongdao.

Figure 4

Table 3. Major and trace element analyses for the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan, South China

Figure 5

Figure 3. Rock classification diagrams for the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan. (a) TAS diagram (after Maitre et al. 1989); (b) Zr/TiO2–Nb/Y diagram (after Winchester & Floyd, 1977). The shaded areas outline the ranges of compositions for the mafic–ultramafic rocks from the Longsheng area of northern Guangxi with data sources from Zhou, J. C. et al. (2004) and Ge et al. (2000).

Figure 6

Figure 4. Major, trace elements and incompatible element ratios v. Zr for the Neoproterozoic mafic–ultramafic rocks from western Hunan. FC – fractional crystallization.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Normalized REE and trace element patterns for the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan. Chondrite, primitive mantle and OIB data are from Sun & McDonough (1989).

Figure 8

Table 4. Sm–Nd isotopic data for the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan, South China

Figure 9

Figure 6. Hf isotopes and the recalculated weighted average ϵHf(t) values for the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan. QY-2, from Qianyang; 05TD-3–3, from Tongdao. The shaded area is used for comparison.

Figure 10

Figure 7. Major and trace elements v. Mg no. plot for the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan.

Figure 11

Figure 8. Tectonic discriminative diagrams for the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan. (a) 2Nb–Zr/4–Y plot (after Meschede, 1986); (b) Ti–Zr plot (after Pearce, 1982). WPA – within-plate alkaline basalts; WPB – within-plate basalts; WPT – within-plate tholeiites; VAB – volcanic arc basalts; MORB – middle ocean ridge basalts; N-MORB – normal MORB; P-MORB – plume MORB. The shaded areas outline the ranges of compositions for the mafic–ultramafic rocks from the Longsheng area with data sources from Zhou, J. C. et al. (2004) and Ge et al. (2000).

Supplementary material: File

Wang supplementary material

Supplementary table 5

Download Wang supplementary material(File)
File 99.8 KB