Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T12:28:26.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of herbicides for Geyer larkspur (Delphinium geyeri) control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2025

Clinton A. Stonecipher*
Affiliation:
Rangeland Scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Poisonous Plant Research Laboratory, Logan, UT, USA
Kevin D. Welch
Affiliation:
Toxicologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Poisonous Plant Research Laboratory, Logan, UT, USA
Justin D. Derner
Affiliation:
Rangeland Scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit, Cheyenne, WY, USA
Dale R. Gardner
Affiliation:
Chemist, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Poisonous Plant Research Laboratory, Logan, UT, USA
Corey Ransom
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Plant, Soils, and Climate Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
Daniel Cook
Affiliation:
Plant Physiologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Poisonous Plant Research Laboratory, Logan, UT, USA
*
Corresponding author: Clint Stonecipher; Email: clint.stonecipher@usda.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Geyer larkspur is a native perennial forb that is toxic to cattle. Herbicide control of Geyer larkspur is variable and depends on the growth stage of the plant when the herbicide is applied. The objectives of this study were to 1) evaluate aminopyralid, aminopyralid + florpyrauxifen-benzyl, aminopyralid + 2,4-D, aminopyralid + metsulfuron-methyl, metsulfuron-methyl, triclopyr, and triclopyr + 2,4-D for efficacy in controlling Geyer larkspur; 2) determine whether plant growth stage (vegetative or flowering) at the time of herbicide application influences herbicide effectiveness; and 3) determine whether herbicide treatment alters the norditerpenoid alkaloid content of Geyer larkspur. Plots were established in eastern Wyoming in 2021 and northern Colorado in 2022. Herbicide application at the different phenological stages did not affect Geyer larkspur density at the Wyoming site (P = 0.1065; data not shown). Geyer larkspur density at the Wyoming site was reduced by all herbicide treatments 1 yr after treatment (YAT) at the vegetative stage and by all herbicides except triclopyr 2 YAT (P = 0.0249). Geyer larkspur density at the flowering stage was reduced by all herbicides except metsulfuron-methyl, triclopyr, and triclopyr + 2,4-D at 1 YAT and by triclopyr and triclopyr + 2,4-D at 2 YAT. In contrast, there were no differences in Geyer larkspur density across treatments at the Colorado site (P = 0.9621). Precipitation was below average several months prior to herbicide application, which may have affected herbicide effectiveness. The metsulfuron-methyl treatment resulted in the highest total alkaloid concentrations of Geyer larkspur at the vegetative stage and the lowest concentrations at the flowering stage at the Wyoming site. Efforts to control Geyer larkspur in semiarid rangelands can be effectively accomplished by applying aminopyralid herbicides at either the vegetative or flowering growth stage provided environmental conditions prior to herbicide application are sufficient for plant growth and uptake of the herbicide.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America.
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2025.
Figure 0

Table 1. Herbicides and application rates used to treat Geyer larkspur.a

Figure 1

Table 2. Monthly precipitation for the year that herbicides were applied, the 2 yr of data collection, and the 50-year average.a,b,c

Figure 2

Table 3. Geyer larkspur density before herbicide treatment and 1 and 2 yr after treatment.a–d

Figure 3

Figure 1. Total alkaloid concentration of Geyer larkspur plants treated with herbicides at vegetative and flowering stages of phenological development near Cheyenne, WY, 2021–2023.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Total and N-(methylsuccinimido) anthranoyllycoctonine (MSAL) alkaloid concentrations of Geyer larkspur plants treated with herbicides near Virginia Dale, CO, 2022–2024.

Figure 5

Table 4. Dry matter biomass of rangeland components 2 yr after herbicide treatment of Geyer larkspur.a,b,c

Figure 6

Table 5. Dry matter biomass of rangeland components 2 yr after herbicide treatment of Geyer larkspura,b,c.