Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T17:20:36.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Quest for the Best Local Analogues of Reionization Era Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2026

Claus Leitherer*
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore
Oskar Aranguré
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore UNAM, Ensenada
Calum Hawcroft
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore
Nimisha Kumari
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore
Isabel Rivera
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the processes in place during the epoch of reionization (EoR) is a frontier goal of observational cosmology, centered on uncovering the sources of reionization. Local reionization-era analogs are commonly used as proxies for EoR galaxies; however, these analogs are often too massive. The low-mass dwarf starburst galaxies Pox 186 and UM 461 offer physical conditions representative of EoR systems. We discuss comprehensive panchromatic data from the far-UV to the mid-IR, emphasizing ground-based IFU, HST and JWST observations. We model the stellar population, nebular emission, and dust using various stellar and nebular synthesis codes, and address challenges in these models to inform the next generation of stellar atmosphere and evolution models.

Information

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Astronomical Union
Figure 0

Table 1. Main properties of Pox 186 and UM 461.Table 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 1. HST images of Pox 186 and UM 461. Left: Pox 186 – HST/WFPC2 U+V+I (Corbin & Vacca (2002); right: UM 461 – HST/WFC3+ACS U+V+I (Elmegreen et al. (2022)).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Top: fit to the HST/COS FUV spectrum of Pox 186. Black: observed spectrum. The masked regions excluded from the spectral fitting are shown in grey and blue. The best-fit (red) is derived using single-star Starburst99 spectral synthesis models. Green: error spectrum. Bottom: contribution of each individual burst to the best fit. Each panel displays the best-fit light-weighted stellar age, metallicity, and dust attenuation. The vertical dashed line marks the average stellar age. Left panel: results from Starburst99. Right panel: results from BPASS.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Left: optical diagnostic diagram showing the ratio of [O III] λ$\lambda$5007/Hβ$\beta$ versus [N II] λ$\lambda$6584/Hα$\alpha$. The triangles and crosses denote a family of photo-ionization models for star-forming galaxies by Gutkin et al. (2016) and for AGN by Feltre et al. (2016) that are overlapping. The clusters in Pox 186 and UM 461 are at the locus of both model sets. Right: corresponding UV diagnostic digram for Si III] λ$\lambda$1883/C III λ$\lambda$1908 versus C III] λ$\lambda$1908/He II λ$\lambda$1640. Star-formation and AGN models are well separated, and Pox 186 and UM 461 are in the region of star formation.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Left: plot of EW(C III] λ$\lambda$1908) versus the EW of (C III λ$\lambda$1908 + Hβ$\beta$). Pox 186 and UM 461 (red symbols) are compared to a galaxy sample at low and high z. From Kumari et al. (2024). Right: Diagnostic diagram for EW(C III] λ$\lambda$1908) versus the ratio of C IV λ$\lambda$1549/C III] λ$\lambda$1908. The grid has been computed with photo-ionization models for a range of metallicities (blue/purple) and ionization parameters (red/yellow). Pox 186 and the high-z galaxy GS-z12 are outside the grid. From D’Eugenio et al. (2024).