Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T15:24:32.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of risk factors for medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms in children with Kawasaki disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2026

Yuhang Zhou
Affiliation:
Medical College, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China Department of Cardiology, Wuhan Children’s Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Changjian Li
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Wuhan Children’s Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Tingjie Wen
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Wuhan Children’s Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Yong Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Wuhan Children’s Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
*
Corresponding author: Yong Zhang; Email: zhangyong1@zgwhfe.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Our study aimed to explore risk factors for medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms in children with Kawasaki disease.

Methods:

6,540 eligible children with Kawasaki disease who were diagnosed in Wuhan Children’s Hospital from January 2011 to December 2023 were retrospectively analysed. The clinical and laboratory data were compared between medium–giant group and non–medium–giant group.

Results:

A total of 6,540 patients with Kawasaki disease were included, and 162 (2.5%) developed medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms, of whom 56 (0.9%) were giant. Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups in 22 variables (P< 0.05). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis revealed that intravenous immunoglobulin resistance, haemoglobin, platelet count, and albumin were the most significant risk factors for medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms. The result of binary logistic regression analysis showed that intravenous immunoglobulin resistance (OR = 6.474, 95%CI = 4.399 ∼ 9.528, P< 0.001), platelet count elevation (OR = 1.003, 95%CI = 1.002 ∼ 1.004, P< 0.001), and albumin reduction (OR = 0.912, 95%CI = 0.879 ∼ 0.946, P< 0.001) were independent risk factors affecting the occurrence of medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms, and the area under the curve of the regression model was 0.75, with a sensitivity of 62.3% and a specificity of 79.2%.

Conclusions:

Intravenous immunoglobulin resistance, platelet counts elevation, and albumin levels reduction may be significant predictors of medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms and can serve as a reference for early diagnosis of medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between the medium–giant CAA group and the non–medium–giant CAA group

Figure 1

Table 2. Comparison of laboratory indices between the medium–giant CAA group and the non–medium–giant CAA group

Figure 2

Figure 1. LASSO regression coefficient path. X-axis: Log Lambda values, ranging from −11 to −4. The Log Lambda value is the regularisation parameter in LASSO regression that controls the strength of the penalty applied to the coefficients. Y-axis: The magnitude of the coefficients, indicating the strength of the association between the predictor variables and the response variable. Plot elements: This plot illustrates how the coefficients of various predictor variables change with different Log Lambda values. Non-zero coefficients at a given Lambda level indicate that the variable is selected as a predictor in the model at that level of regularisation. Computational method: We employed cross-validation to determine the optimal Lambda value. Specifically, we calculated the cross-validated error for each Lambda value and selected the one that minimised the error (lambda. min = 0.00052382). Additionally, we chose a more conservative Lambda value within one standard error of lambda. min (lambda.1se = 0.00936923) to balance model complexity and predictive accuracy. The final model was constructed based on lambda.1se, selecting the following four predictor variables: IVIG, PLT, HGB, and ALB. LASSO = least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; IVIG = intravenous immunoglobulin; PLT = platelet counts; HGB = haemoglobin; ALB = albumin.

Figure 3

Figure 2. LASSO regression cross-validation curve. X-axis: Log Lambda values, ranging from −11 to −4. Y-axis: Binomial deviance, a measure of how well the model fits the data. Plot elements: This plot displays the model’s binomial deviance across various Lambda values. A smaller Lambda indicates a more complex model, while a larger Lambda suggests a simpler model. Computational method: We assessed model performance by comparing binomial deviance at different Lambda values. The selection of lambda. min or lambda. 1se was based on cross-validation error. At lambda. 1se, the model maintains a good fit while selecting the minimal number of predictor variables, thus avoiding overfitting. This approach ensures the model’s generalisability, allowing us to identify the four most influential predictor variables from a pool of candidates. LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator.

Figure 4

Figure 3. ROC curve analysis of the risk prediction model for medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms. The ROC curve for the predictive model was plotted, with an AUC was calculated to be 0.75, suggesting that the model has certain predictive value for medium–giant coronary artery aneurysms. ROC = receiver operating characteristic; AUC = area under the curve.

Figure 5

Table 3. Binary logistic regression analysis of medium–giant CAA in children with KD