Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T11:16:25.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of tragal perichondrium with cubism graft in endoscopic tympanoplasty in small- to medium-size tympanic membrane perforations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

Nehal Lal*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT & Head and Neck Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
*
Corresponding author: Nehal Lal; Email: Nehallal.nl@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Cubism graft technique offers controlled thinning of the cartilage and prevents over-curling. This article compares tragal perichondrium with the new cubism graft in tympanoplasty in small- to medium-size tympanic membrane perforations.

Methodology

In our study, we included 40 patients, where tragal perichondrium was used as a graft in 20 patients, while cubism graft with tragal cartilage was used in the other 20 patients.

Results

Only two patients had a failure in graft uptake in the tragal perichondrium group, while three patients had a failure in graft uptake in the group where cubism graft with tragal cartilage was used. Significant closure of the air-bone gap (≥ 9 dB) was observed in post-operative audiogram at three-month follow-up in both groups.

Conclusion

This study concludes that the new cubism graft is comparable to tragal perichondrium graft in terms of graft uptake and closure of the air-bone gap.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Showing surgical technique of group A patients: (a) Harvesting tragal perichondrium. (b) Harvested tragal perichondrium. (c) Small central perforation. (d) Margins of perforation freshened. (e) Middle ear packed with gelfoam. (f) Tragal perichondrium placed over the perforation (pop-in technique).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Showing preparation of cubism graft: (a) Margins of perforation freshened. (b) Harvesting tragal cartilage. (c) Tragal cartilage after removal of cartilage from convex side. (d) Thinning of tragal cartilage and cartilage dust formation. (e) PRF prepared. (f) Formation of cubism graft.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Placement of tragal cartilage medial to perforation. (b) Placement of cubism graft over the perforation.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Post-operative graft uptake after three months: (a) Cubism graft with tragal cartilage. (b) Tragal perichondrium graft.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Showing the graft uptake in both the groups.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Comparing the ABG in the two groups.