Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T11:48:51.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The genus Xanthogramma Schiner, 1861 (Diptera: Syrphidae) in southeastern Europe, with descriptions of two new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

Zorica Nedeljković*
Affiliation:
BioSense Institute-Research Institute for Information Technologies in Biosystems, Dr Zorana Đinđića 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Antonio Ricarte
Affiliation:
BioSense Institute-Research Institute for Information Technologies in Biosystems, Dr Zorana Đinđića 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Ljiljana Šašić Zorić
Affiliation:
BioSense Institute-Research Institute for Information Technologies in Biosystems, Dr Zorana Đinđića 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Mihajla Đan
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Dragana Obreht Vidaković
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Ante Vujić
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
2Corresponding author (e-mail: zoricaned14@gmail.com)

Abstract

Examination of 122 specimens of Xanthogramma Schiner, 1861 (Diptera: Syrphidae) from varied localities in Europe (+Turkey) resulted in the description of two new species (X. aeginae Ricarte, Nedeljković, and Vujić new species and X. pilosum Nedeljković, Ricarte, and Vujić new species), as well as new data on six other species. Most of the examined material originated from the Balkan Peninsula and Greek islands. New species concepts were supported by morphological and molecular evidence. Relationships among the eight studied species were analysed and discussed based on the data of nuclear (ITS2) and mitochondrial (COI) genes sequences. An identification key to the European species of Xanthogramma is provided. Lectotypes are designated for Doros decoratum Zetterstedt, 1843, Lasiophthicus novus Rondani, 1857, Syrphus laetus Fabricius, 1794, Syrphus ornatus Meigen, 1822, and Xanthogramma nobilitatum Frey, 1946.

Information

Type
Systematics & Morphology
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2018 
Figure 0

Figs. 1–4 Xanthogramma species, overall appearance, dorsal view. 1, Xanthogramma aeginae, male holotype; 2, Xanthogramma aeginae, female paratype; 3, Xanthogramma pilosum, male holotype; 4, Xanthogramma pilosum, female paratype.

Figure 1

Figs. 5–8 Xanthogramma species, thorax, lateral view. 5, Xanthogramma pilosum, male holotype; 6, Xanthogramma laetum, male; 7, Xanthogramma aeginae, male holotype; 8, Xanthogramma citrofasciatum, male.

Figure 2

Figs. 9–12 Xanthogramma species, abdomen, dorsal view. 9, Xanthogramma citrofasciatum; 10, Xanthogramma laetum; 11, Xanthogramma pilosum, male holotype; 12, Xanthogramma aeginae, male holotype.

Figure 3

Table 1 Diagnostic morphological differences between Xanthogramma citrofasciatum and Xanthogramma aeginae.

Figure 4

Figs. 13–15 Syrphus laetus (=Xanthogramma laetum), lectotype. 13, dorsal view; 14, lateral view; 15, labels.

Figure 5

Figs. 16–18 Lasiophthicus novus (=Xanthogramma novum), lectotype. 16, dorsal view; 17, lateral view; 18, labels.

Figure 6

Figs. 19–21 Doros decoratus (=Xanthogramma decoratum), lectotype. 19, dorsal view; 20, lateral view; 21, labels.

Figure 7

Fig. 22 Xanthogramma pilosum male holotype, head, lateral view.

Figure 8

Figs. 23–24 Xanthogramma species, right wing, dorsal view. 23, Xanthogramma laetum; 24, Xanthogramma. pilosum, holotype.

Figure 9

Figs. 25–26 Xanthogramma species, male, head, anterolateral view. 25, Xanthogramma laetum; 26, Xanthogramma pilosum, holotype.

Figure 10

Figs. 27–30 Xanthogramma species, male, mesonotum, lateral view. 27, Xanthogramma aeginae, holotype; 28, Xanthogramma citrofasciatum; 29, Xanthogramma laetum; 30, Xanthogramma pilosum, holotype.

Figure 11

Figs. 31–32 Xanthogramma species, male genitalia, lateral view. 31, Xanthogramma aeginae, holotype; 32, Xanthogramma pilosum, holotype.

Figure 12

Figs. 33–34 Xanthogramma nobilitatum, lectotype. 33, dorsal view; 34, lateral view.

Figure 13

Figs. 35-37 Syrphus ornatus (=Xanthogramma ornatum), lectotype. 35, dorsal view; 36, lateral view; 37, labels.

Figure 14

Fig. 38 Map of population sampling locations of the examined species.

Figure 15

Fig. 39 ITS2 strict consensus tree of four equally parsimonious trees. Length=225 steps; consistency index (ci)=89; retention index (RI)=90. Bootstrap values higher than 50 are indicated near nodes. Filled circles indicate non-homoplasious changes and open circles homoplasious changes. aff., species affinis.

Figure 16

Fig. 40 COI tree based on maximum parsimony approach. Length=130 steps; consistency index (ci)=91; retention index (RI)=96. Bootstrap values higher than 50 are indicated near nodes. Filled circles represent non-homoplasious changes and open circles homoplasious changes.

Figure 17

Fig 41 Combined analysis of COI and ITS2 sequences. Strict consensus of two equally parsimonious trees. Length=363 steps; consistency index=88; retention index=92. Bootstrap values higher than 50 are indicated near nodes. Filled circles denote non-homoplasious changes and open circles homoplasious changes.

Figure 18

Table 2 Diagnostic morphological differences between Xanthogramma laetum and Xanthogramma pilosum.

Supplementary material: File

Nedeljković et al. supplementary material

Nedeljković et al. supplementary material 1

Download Nedeljković et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.2 KB