Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T04:26:29.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design of a cost-effective intelligent surface structure for field reconfiguration of an antenna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2024

Aijaz Ahmed
Affiliation:
Brightsandz Clean Tech Private Limited, Gurugram, Haryana, India
Satya Kesh Dubey*
Affiliation:
Senior Principal Scientist, CSIR - National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi, India
*
Corresponding author: Satya Kesh Dubey; Email: dubeysk@nplindia.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work presents a passive intelligent surface designed at 2.45 GHz that has the capability of transmitting and reflecting electromagnetic waves that are incident upon it. The proposed surface does not require any circuitry or power source to function. Therefore, it makes a cost-effective and simple intelligent surface. It is a simple metallic structure that has embedded waveguide slots on its surface, allowing the waves to couple for transmission. A prototype of the proposed surface is designed using an aluminum foil and analyzed for both transmission and reflection of the wave. Further, the designed surface is investigated for tuning the directionality of the radiated field from the antenna. For this purpose, a coplanar patch antenna is first designed and then combined with the surface to tune the directionality of the radiated field of this antenna. The outcome of the measured performance validates that the proposed surface has the potential capability of field reconfiguration in wireless communication for Wi-Fi, WLAN, and Bluetooth applications.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The European Microwave Association.
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Conceptual use of proposed arrangement; (b) Positions of surface with respect to antenna and corresponding radiation pattern.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Cross section of the proposed surface; (b) fabricated surface; (c) simulation environment for the proposed surface.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Simulated S parameters of the proposed surface.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Experimental setup for measurement of reflection and transmission from the WIS; (b) reflection and transmission graph.

Figure 4

Table 1. Physical constraints of designed antenna (in mm)

Figure 5

Figure 5. Cross section of the proposed antenna with design steps (a) step 1; (b) step 2; (c) proposed antenna; (d) fabricated antenna; (e) Reflection graph of antenna for step by step evolution.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Comparison of simulated and measured performance of antenna (a) Reflection graph; (b) Radiation patterns (theta and phi).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Comparison of Antenna performance; (a) S- parameters; (b) radiation pattern (phi and theta) for different values of ‘Dis’; (c) radiation pattern for different distances of WIS w.r.t to antenna; (d) radiation pattern for different positions of WIS w.r.t to antenna.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Experimental setup for measurement of overall radiation pattern of the antenna in proximity of the WIS.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Measured performance of the fabricated surface along with the antenna; (a) S-parameters; (b) radiation patterns (phi and theta).