Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:16:52.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crystallization and textural evolution of a closed-system magma chamber: insights from a crystal size distribution study of the Lilloise layered intrusion, East Greenland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

C. MAGEE*
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
B. O'DRISCOLL
Affiliation:
School of Physical and Geographical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
A. D. CHAMBERS
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
*
†Author for correspondence: cxm477@bham.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recognition that postcumulus processes significantly modify primary textures in layered mafic intrusions has thrown into question many early observations on which classical crystallization theories are based. Petrographic observations combined with quantitative textural analysis of samples from various stratigraphic levels of the Lilloise intrusion, East Greenland, demonstrate that postcumulus textural modification of cumulates, formed during the solidification of a closed system magma chamber, may be detected. Crystal size distribution (CSD) measurements of Lilloise cumulates and the resulting CSD profiles are compared to predicted theoretical closed system CSD profiles. Similarities between the measured CSD profiles and published predicted CSD profiles support Lilloise magma evolving in a closed system chamber and indicate that primary crystallization processes can be distinguished using quantitative textural techniques. Textural coarsening driven by syn-magmatic deformation is suggested to be the dominant postcumulus process affecting CSD plot morphology. CSD slope values and profiles (plot shapes) remain relatively constant for a given liquidus mineral (particularly olivine and clinopyroxene), so that the number of phases on the liquidus at any one time affects mineral modal abundances. As a result, CSDs generally exhibit overall smaller grainsizes and progressively lower nucleation densities at higher levels in the intrusion.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Regional map of Greenland and (b) locality map for Lilloise showing the known outcrop area of the three cumulate zones and sample localities (adapted from Chambers & Brown, 1995).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Comparison of mineral modal abundances, cumulus mineral composition and the appearance of accessory minerals with stratigraphic height (Chambers & Brown, 1995).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Schematic cross-section of Lilloise showing the overall deformed structure of the intrusion (adapted from Chambers & Brown, 1995). At the intrusion contacts the lava pile is down-turned and the layering is up-turned. Diagram is not to scale.

Figure 3

Table 1. Mineral modes and petrography of the Lilloise cumulates

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Texturally equilibrated mono-mineralic olivine sample (L401) displaying 120° olivine–olivine–olivine apparent dihedral angles (black arrow). Cr-spinel occurs at olivine grain boundaries (white arrow). (b) Photomicrograph of Sample L5 showing a linear array of dendritic symplectites oriented parallel to an olivine strain wall (white arrow). (c) Large symplectite from Sample L5 consisting of two distinct phases, magnetite and diopside (white arrow), within an olivine crystal. (d) Mono-mineralic clinopyroxene sample (L13) with texturally equilibrated 120° apparent dihedral angles (white arrow). (e) Photomicrograph from L171, a gabbroic Middle Zone sample, showing the typical clinopyroxene-plagioclase–plagioclase dihedral angles that approach ~ 100° (white arrow) of the Middle Zone orthocumulates. (f) Fine-grained ilmenite crystals, oriented parallel to cleavage planes, exsolved in clinopyroxene from Sample L192. Note the absence of ilmenite surrounding the central amphibole crystal and the crystal rims (white arrows).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Digitized textural maps of thin-sections, from the Lower Zone (a), Middle Zone (b) and Upper Zone (c), used to measure textural parameters input into CSDCorrections 1.37. (a) Mono-mineralic olivine cumulate sample (L401) showing a texturally equilibrated adcumulate texture. (b) Typical orthocumulate texture observed in the gabbroic Middle Zone samples, which typically consist of cumulus olivine, clinopyroxene and plagioclase. (c) Texture map of Sample L187 showing the oikocrystic nature of cumulus amphibole encompassing plagioclase chadacrysts.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Bent and spindle plagioclase twin lamellae observed in Sample L192. (b) Photomicrograph of LM141 showing a plagioclase glomerocryst (white arrow), consisting of aligned tabular plagioclase crystals and surrounded by cumulus amphibole, which also contain a visible fabric. (c) Equilibrated plagioclase–plagioclase–plagioclase apparent dihedral angles of 120° (white arrow) from within a plagioclase glomerocryst in LM141. (d) Zoning of a plagioclase crystal (white arrow) in Sample LM141. (e) Thick, stubby ilmenite crystals exsolved in amphibole crystals, from Sample LM141, forming a hexagonal outline. Note the sub-parallelism between the hexagonal outline of exsolved ilmenite and crystal edges of the euhedral amphibole. (f) Photomicrograph of amphibole-amphibole-amphibole apparent dihedral angles from LM141. The 120° dihedral angles (white arrow) indicate a significant amount of textural equilibration has occurred.

Figure 7

Table 2. Textural data parameters input into CSDCorrections 1.37

Figure 8

Table 3. CSD results including slope and intercept data

Figure 9

Figure 7. CSD plots for the major cumulus phases observed in Lilloise, plotted with respect to their stratigraphic height and mineral modal abundances.

Figure 10

Figure 8. (a) Plot of characteristic length v. intercept for all Lilloise samples. All mineral data fall below their respective phase closure limit, therefore validating the CSD results. (b) Plot of characteristic length v. volumetric abundance for all CSD data. Olivine shows a horizontal trend, indicating CSD slope is constant regardless of volumetric abundance, while plagioclase and amphibole display no trend. The positive correlation of clinopyroxene reveals that stratigraphically lower samples have the greatest characteristic lengths and volumetric abundances. Samples L187N and L187C represent CSD profiles for plagioclase outside of the oikocrysts and plagioclase chadacrysts, respectively. (c) CSD plot combining all calculated olivine profiles. Although L401 has a greater nucleation density and maximum crystal size, as well as a pronounced convex-upward hump at small size fractions, the slopes of all plots are relatively constant. (d) Comparative plot of all clinopyroxene CSDs revealing L13 and L184 have shallower slopes and lower nucleation densities compared to the other Middle Zone CSD profiles. (e) CSD plot describing the fanned nature and curvature of the plagioclase CSDs. (f) CSD plot for Lilloise Lower Zone Cr-spinel in Sample 401 (see text and Table 1 for details). The highlighted fields encapsulate CSDs for Cr-spinel seams from the Rum Layered Suite, Scotland (hatched – data from O'Driscoll et al. 2009) and the Stillwater Complex, USA (diagonal lines – data from Waters & Boudreau, 1996), included for comparison.

Figure 11

Figure 9. (a) Theoretical CSD plot describing the systematic increase to nucleation rate and maximum crystal size maintaining a constant slope, with increasing crystallinity, predicted by Marsh (1998) for closed systems. The convex-upwards hump developed at higher crystal proportions represents the decrease in available melt. (b) Simple kinked CSD representing a mixing of multiple crystal populations, typical of open system dynamics (after Marsh, 1998). (c) Plot describing effect of dissolution of smaller crystal sizes and precipitation of material on larger crystals, creating growth, on CSD profiles with time (Communicating Neighbours textural coarsening; Higgins, 2002a).