Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:38:33.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Management of stemborer Busseola fusca (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using sowing date, host plant and chemical control in sorghum in the highlands of Eritrea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2015

Adugna Haile*
Affiliation:
Hamelmalo College of Agriculture (HAC), PO Box 397, Keren, Eritrea
*

Abstract

The effects of sowing date, host plant and insecticidal control of the stemborer Busseola fusca Fuller were studied in the highlands of Eritrea at Halhal Begos in 2003–2005. Sowing date had a significant effect on stemborer incidence and damage levels. Early sowing dates (April 1 and 15) had significantly lower numbers of larvae, percent infestation and deadhearts, and produced higher yields compared with later sowing dates. In the host preference experiment, Sudangrass (Sorghum× drummondii (Steud.) Millsp. & Chase) had the highest infestation (91%), and it was the most preferred host for oviposition among the tested plants. All the chemical treatments significantly reduced stemborer infestation and damage levels compared with untreated plots. Furadan and Cymbush significantly lowered infestation and larval damage. There were significant differences in days to heading, maturity, plant height and yield. In general, the study showed that early planting coupled with host preference and insecticides reduced the infestation of stemborers and significantly increased the yield of sorghum in the highlands of Eritrea.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1 Common and scientific names of host plants used in the study

Figure 1

Table 2 Influence of sowing date on Busseola fusca attack in sorghum at Halhal Begos, Eritrea, 2003–2005

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Number of Busseola fusca larvae on different host plants at Halhal Begos in 2003–2005 (error bars represent standard errors). 1, Sudangrass; 2, Columbus grass; 3, sorghum; 4, maize; 5, pearl millet; 6, finger millet; 7, Setaria; and 8, wheat.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Oviposition preference of Busseola fusca on different host plants at Halhal Begos in 2003–2005 (error bars represent standard errors). 1, Sudangrass; 2, Columbus grass; 3, sorghum; 4, maize; 5, pearl millet; 6, finger millet; 7, Setaria; and 8, wheat.

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Number of Busseola fusca larvae on different host plants at Halhal Begos 1997–1999 (Error bars represent standard errors).

Figure 5

Table 3 Number of pupae per plant, weight of pupae and losses of stemborer Busseola fusca on different host plants at Halhal Begos, 2005

Figure 6

Table 4 Mean number of stemborer larvae, percent infestation, percent deadheart, number of holes, tunnel length, maturity and yield (q/ha) of sorghum in the insecticide-treated and control plots at Halhal Begos in 2003

Figure 7

Table 5 Mean number of stemborer larvae, percent infestation, percent deadheart, number of holes, tunnel length, maturity and yield (q/ha) of sorghum in the insecticide-treated and untreated plots at Halhal Begos in 2004

Figure 8

Table 6 Mean number of stemborer larvae, percent infested plants, percent deadheart plants, maturity and yield (q/ha) of sorghum in the insecticide-treated and control plots at Halhal Begos in 2005

Figure 9

Table 7 Cost and amount of insecticide, labour wage, yield increase over control, price of grain and benefit due to control of Busseola fusca at Halhal Begos in 2003–2005+