Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:11:48.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization and use of clays and argillites from the south of Santa Catarina State, Brazil, for the manufacture of clay ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

Alexandre Zaccaron
Affiliation:
Graduation Program on Materials Science and Engineering, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária 1105, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88806-000, Brazil
Vítor de Souza Nandi
Affiliation:
Graduation Program on Materials Science and Engineering, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária 1105, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88806-000, Brazil
Marcelo Dal Bó
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina, Campus Criciúma, Rodovia SC 443 845, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88813-600, Brazil
Michael Peterson
Affiliation:
Graduation Program on Materials Science and Engineering, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária 1105, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88806-000, Brazil
Elídio Angioletto
Affiliation:
Graduation Program on Materials Science and Engineering, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária 1105, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88806-000, Brazil
Adriano Michael Bernardin*
Affiliation:
Graduation Program on Materials Science and Engineering, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária 1105, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88806-000, Brazil Ceramic Materials Group, Parque Científico e Tecnológico, Rodovia Governador Jorge Lacerda 3800, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, 88807-400, Brazil
*
*E-mail: amb@unesc.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six clays from various deposits were studied for their use in the production of structural clay products. The clays were characterized using chemical (X-ray fluorescence), mineralogical (X-ray diffraction) and thermal (differential scanning calorimetry/thermogravimetry) analyses. Particle-size distribution was determined by laser diffraction, plasticity by the Pfefferkorn method and the residue by the sieve-size method. Next, specimens were formed by extrusion and characterized by their linear thermal shrinkage (on drying and firing), water absorption, bulk density, porosity and compressive strength. The clays were, in general, suitable for the manufacture of structural ceramics, mainly bricks. The clays from flooded pits (AV1 and AV2) were classified as floodplain clays and alluvial clays. The clays mined in mountainous regions (AM1 and AM2, as well as AV1) were characterized as siliceous clays due to the abundance of free SiO2 phases.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The geographical location of the study area (Wildner et al., 2014).

Figure 1

Table 1. Chemical compositions of the clays and argillites determined using XRF spectroscopy.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Mineralogical analysis of the clays and argillites determined using XRD.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Thermal analysis of clays and argillites determined using DSC/TG.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Particle-size distribution of the clays and argillites determined by laser diffraction.

Figure 5

Table 2. Cumulative fractions (10%, 50%, 90%) and average particle diameters of the clays and argillites determined using the laser diffraction technique.

Figure 6

Table 3. Residue retained at the 325 ASTM mesh of the clays and argillites determined using sieving technique.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Plasticity index for the clays and argillites determined using the Pfefferkorn method.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Shrinkage (%) after drying at 110°C for the clays and argillites.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Compressive strength (MPa) after drying at 110°C for the clays and argillites.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Shrinkage (%) after firing at 900°C for the clays and argillites.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Water absorption (%) after firing for the clays and argillites.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Apparent density (g cm–3) after firing for the clays and argillites.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Apparent porosity (%) after firing for the clays and argillites.

Figure 14

Fig. 12. Compressive strength (MPa) after firing at 900°C for the clays and argillites.

Figure 15

Table 4. Results for residue (at 325 mesh, Rcp), plasticity index (PI), drying shrinkage (Shd), compressive strength after drying (σCd), firing shrinkage (Shf), water absorption (WA), apparent density (ρapp), apparent porosity (Papp) and compressive strength after firing (σCf) (± SD).