Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:01:17.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new pygmy species of box jellyfish (Cubozoa: Chirodropida) from sub-tropical Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2015

Lisa-Ann Gershwin*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, 7000, Tasmania, AustraliaSouth Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, AustraliaQueensland Museum, South Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
Merrick Ekins
Affiliation:
Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: L. Gershwin, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart Tasmania, 7000, Australia email: lisa-ann.gershwin@csiro.au

Abstract

Tropical box jellyfish include some of the world's most venomous animals, leading researchers and the media to wonder whether changes in climate may drive these species into sub-tropical waters. The discovery, therefore, of small box jellyfish in the waterways of the Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast of south-east Queensland raised concern. This pygmy species proved to be new to science, separated from other species in the genus Chiropsella by its very small size; its semi-circular phacellae; very shallow, coalesced gastric saccules; its peculiar, long pedalia where the ‘palm’ is greatly reduced and the non-opposing ‘fingers’ branch off together at the same level; and a knee-like bend of the pedalial canal. The residential canal/river habitat of this species of chirodropid raises the question of whether this area is also suitable for habitation by the larger, more virulent chirodropids such as the so-called ‘deadly box jellyfish’, Chironex fleckeri. This new species, Chiropsella saxoni sp. nov., brings the total number of chirodropid species described from Australian waters to five.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1.Comparison of main diagnostic criteria of Australian chirodropids.

Figure 1

Fig. 1.Chiropsella saxoni sp. nov., QLD paratype, habitus, in life.

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Chiropsella saxoni sp. nov., holotype. A. Habitus. B. Rhopalial niche ostium; note smooth upper covering scale (arrow).

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Chiropsella saxoni sp. nov., holotype pedalia; note ‘fingers’ arising close together on reduced ‘palm’. A. Side view. B. Adaxial view. Inset of adaxial view of other species for comparison: C. Chiropsella bronzie, D. Chiropsella bart.

Figure 4

Fig. 4.Chiropsella saxoni sp. nov., holotype. A. Phacellae; note semi-circular shape and short, singly-rooted cirri. B. Pedalial canal; note knee-shaped bend (arrow).

Figure 5

Fig. 5.Chiropsella saxoni sp. nov., holotype. A. Velarial structures of one octant. B. Apical view; note semi-circular phacellae; note also exumbrellar sculpturing.

Figure 6

Fig. 6.Chiropsella gastric saccules, marked with white arrows. A. Chiropsella cf bart. B. Chiropsella bronzie. C. Chiropsella saxoni.

Figure 7

Fig. 7.Chiropsella saxoni sp. nov., nematocysts of holotype under 400× magnification. A. Mastigophores (arrow, lower left) and rhopaloids (arrow, upper right). B, D. Tiny rhopaloids (arrows). C, E. Unidentified nematocysts (arrows).