Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:45:27.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spineless cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera (L.)) as an exclusive or partial source of water for goats: histomorphological changes in the digestive, hepatic and renal systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2024

Tamiris Matias da Costa
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, Centro de Ciências Agrárias/CCA/Areia, Paraiba, Brasil
Greicy Mitzi Bezerra Moreno
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus Arapiraca, Arapiraca, Alagoas, Brasil
Neila Lidiany Ribeiro*
Affiliation:
Pós-doc do Programa de pó-graduação de Engenharia Agricola, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brasil
Oscar Boaventura Neto
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus Arapiraca, Arapiraca, Alagoas, Brasil
Vitor Visintin Silva de Almeida
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus Arapiraca, Arapiraca, Alagoas, Brasil
Dorgival Morais de Lima Júnior
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Semiárido, Campus Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil
Edjanio Galdino da Silva
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, Centro de Ciências Agrárias/CCA/Areia, Paraiba, Brasil
Ricardo Romão Guerra
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, Centro de Ciências Agrárias/CCA/Areia, Paraiba, Brasil
*
Corresponding author: Neila Lidiany Ribeiro; Email: neilalr@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the production performance and the occurrence of histomorphometric changes in the digestive, hepatic and renal systems of goats fed with a diet containing different contents of 25 and 55% spineless cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera (L.)) and with partial or total restriction of drinking water. A total of 35 castrated male goats were used, with an average initial body weight of 19 + 1.4 kg, an average age of 8 months and distributed into five treatments: control (CON): 0.8 Tifton-85 hay and 0.2 concentrate with access to drinking water; 0.25 spineless cactus with access to drinking water (25ADW); 0.25 spineless cactus without access to drinking water (25NDW); 0.55 spineless cactus with access to drinking water (55ADW) and 0.55 spineless cactus without access to drinking water (55NDW). Ruminal and intestinal morphometry, liver glycogen reserve index, duodenal goblet cell index and liver and kidney histopathology were carried out. In the treatment with 0.25 spineless cactus and 0.55 Tifton-85 hay, dry matter intake increased by 26%. The papilla absorption area showed that the 0.55 spineless cactus content provided a larger area (P < 0.05) compared to the 0.25 content and the control. It can be concluded that spineless cactus (N. cochenillifera (L.)) can be used in the diet of goats at a concentration of up to 0.55, associated with Tifton-85, with or without access to drinking water, without causing losses in animal performance or at ruminal, intestinal, hepatic or renal level.

Information

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Proportion of water, hay and forage palm in the treatments

Figure 1

Table 2. Chemical composition of diet ingredients on a DM basis (g/kg DM)

Figure 2

Table 3. Proportion of ingredients and chemical composition (DM) of the experimental diets

Figure 3

Table 4. Initial weight (IW), final weight (FW), total weight gain (TWG), average daily weight gain (ADG), DMI and water intake (WI) of goats fed with forage cactus as an exclusive or partial source of water

Figure 4

Figure 1. Photomicrographs of rumen and small intestine of goats fed with Opuntia ficus indica as the sole or partial source of water. (a) Rumen: observe the thickness of epithelium (e) and larger keratinized portion (k), respectively, as a function of the content of 25% of forage palm and water supply for dewatering. (b) Rumen, observe epithelium thickness (e) and smaller keratinized portion (k), respectively, due to the content of 55% of forage palm and no water supply for watering. (c) Rumen: larger absorption area for the content of 55% of forage palm. p, papilla. (d) Rumen: smaller absorption area for a content of 25% forage palm. p, papilla. (e) Intestine: mucosal thickness (m) and submucosal thickness (sm) greater for water-intensifying supply. (f) Intestine: mucosal thickness (m) and submucosal thickness (sm) smaller without supply of water for watering. Haematoxylin–eosin staining.

Figure 5

Table 5. Epithelial thickness (EE), keratinized portion (KQ), papilla height (PH), papilla width (PW), papilla absorption area (PAA) and muscle layer thickness (MLT) of the rumen of goats fed spineless cactus as an exclusive or partial source of water

Figure 6

Table 6. Mucosal thickness (MS), submucosal thickness (SS) and goblet cell index in the epithelium (GCI) of the small intestine of goats fed spineless cactus as an exclusive or partial source of water

Figure 7

Table 7. Hepatic glycogen stock index and frequency of scores by treatment of goats fed with spineless cactus as an exclusive or partial source of water

Figure 8

Table 8. Histopathological changes in the kidneys of goats fed with forage cactus as an exclusive or partial source of water