Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:39:04.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Engineered 2D nanomaterials–protein interfaces for efficient sensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

Kiran Kumar Tadi
Affiliation:
TIFR-Centre for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Hyderabad – 500 075 Telangana, India
Tharangattu N. Narayanan*
Affiliation:
TIFR-Centre for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Hyderabad – 500 075 Telangana, India
Sivaram Arepalli
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251-1892, USA
Kaustav Banerjee
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-9560, USA
Sowmya Viswanathan
Affiliation:
Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts 02462, USA
Dorian Liepmann
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1762, USA
Pulickel M. Ajayan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Nanoengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-1892, USA
Venkatesan Renugopalakrishnan*
Affiliation:
Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA; and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: tnn@tifrh.res.in or tn_narayanan@yahoo.com

Abstract

This article features the importance of nanomaterial–protein interfaces, with a special interest on two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials, for next generation sensors and electronics. Graphene, the first isolated and studied 2D nanomaterial, is taken as the material of most interest and then focused on its engineering by heteroatom doping. The success of graphene engineering for sensors widened the search for better and efficient biosensor platforms of other layered materials such as boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides. But functionalization of 2D backbones with biomolecules often ends up with the disruption of the biological activities due to various reasons. This has to be fundamentally studied and corrected for the clinical implementation of these materials based novel sensing platforms in point-of-care devices and micro-fluidic chips. At the end, importance of various 2D materials–biomolecule interfaces is discussed, and MoS2 based label-free biosensor is highlighted. A method for the modification of MoS2–biomolecule interaction via covalent functionalization of oxygen functionalities in MoS2 is also proposed.

Information

Type
Invited Feature Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. A spectrum of 2D materials is shown. The class of boron–carbon–nitrogen is expanded in the inset, showing the possibilities of engineering the band gap of graphene by similarly sized heteroatom doping.3,4 Reproduced with permission from Nature Publishing Group.4

Figure 1

FIG. 2. The loss of specific function of Concanavalin A protein by a nonspecific binding with single layer graphene and its functioning after a specific binding. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society.30

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Schematic of a 3D graphene network developed from single layer graphene.7

Figure 3

TABLE I. List of a few graphene–bio-interfaces reported.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Tunable electronic properties by of graphene devices by boron doping - (a), (b) tuning the on/off ratio and band gap of graphene, (c) variation in density of states (DOS) upon doping. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society.77

Figure 5

FIG. 5. Current–voltage (I–V) characteristic curves of bulk BN (I), the exfoliated (II), and fluorinated (III) boron nitride nanosheets (BNNS), respectively; an inset showing the amplified view of the I–V curves (I and II). Reproduced from Springer Publishing Group.80

Figure 6

FIG. 6. (a) Schematic illustration of the temperature-triggered switching growth between in-plane h-BN–G and stacked G/h-BN heterostructures, defined as Route 1 and Route 2, respectively. (b) SEM image of a sample synthesized by Route 1, showing discrete hexagonal graphene islands embedded in h-BN. (c) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a sample synthesized by Route 2, showing triangular and rhomboidal graphene islands grown on h-BN. The scale bars in b and c are 2 μm. Reproduced with permission from Nature Publishing Group.79

Figure 7

FIG. 7. Schematic view of an atomically-thin MoS2 based FET biosensor highlighting its ultra-high sensitivity for both protein and pH sensing that beats the sensitivity of graphene based FET biosensors by over 74-fold, its planar platform that promises high-volume/low-cost manufacturability, and its scalability to very small channel lengths that can eventually lead to single molecule detection. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society.92

Figure 8

FIG. 8. FTIR spectra of MoS2 and functionalized MoS2.