Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:52:36.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevention of gentamicin ototoxicity with N-acetylcysteine and vitamin A

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2016

I Aladag
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
M Guven
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sakarya University Medical Faculty, Sakarya, Turkey
M Songu*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Assoc Prof Murat Songu, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey Fax: +90 232 243 1530 E-mail: songumurat@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the use of systemic N-acetylcysteine and vitamin A in the prevention of gentamicin ototoxicity in rats.

Methods:

Forty-two Wistar rats were divided into four groups according to treatment: intratympanic saline, intratympanic gentamicin, intraperitoneal vitamin A after intratympanic gentamicin, and intraperitoneal N-acetylcysteine after intratympanic gentamicin. Signal-to-noise ratio and distortion product otoacoustic emissions were evaluated in all groups.

Results:

N-acetylcysteine had a significant protective effect at 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 kHz, whilst vitamin A had a significant protective effect at 2, 3, 4 and 6 kHz, as determined by the distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. According to the signal-to-noise measurements, N-acetylcysteine had a significant protective effect at 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 kHz, whilst vitamin A had a significant protective effect at 3, 6 and 8 kHz.

Conclusion:

Gentamicin-induced hearing loss in rats may be prevented by the concomitant use of vitamin A and N-acetylcysteine. Specifically, N-acetylcysteine appeared to have a more protective effect than vitamin A for a greater range of noise frequencies.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Differences between distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels per frequency range obtained at baseline and on day 30.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Differences between signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels per frequency range obtained at baseline and on day 30.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Statistical comparison of differences between distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels per frequency range obtained at baseline and on day 30. ns = Non-significant at 0.05 level; ***significant at 0.001 level; **significant at 0.01 level

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Statistical comparison of differences between signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels per frequency range obtained at baseline and on day 30. ns = Non-significant at 0.05 level; **significant at 0.01 level; ***significant at 0.001 level; *significant at 0.05 level