Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:31:12.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of a narrow depth gradient and season on the morphology, phenology, and epibiosis of the brown alga Sargassum cymosum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2010

G.B. Jacobucci*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 38400-902, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
A.Z. Güth
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oceanografia Biológica, Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
A. Turra
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oceanografia Biológica, Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
F.P.P. Leite
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: G.B. Jacobucci, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 38400-902, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil email: jacobucci@inbio.ufu.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Temporal and spatial fluctuations of environmental parameters are normally assigned as causes of variations in morpho-phenological characters of seaweeds and in their epibionts, but formal tests of such hypotheses are lacking, especially in narrow gradients. The present study evaluated the influence of a very small depth gradient (1 to 3 m) and of subtle seasonality characteristic of tropical areas on morpho-phenological traits and on the occurrence of sessile epiphytic organisms using a controlled orthogonal sampling design in a sublittoral population of the tropical brown alga Sargassum cymosum. Four temporal samples were obtained over a one-year period at three depths using nine replicates. The wet weight, maximum length, number of primary and secondary branches, and proportion of secondary branches with receptacles were recorded. Epibiosis was estimated by visual evaluation of percentage cover on secondary branches. Algal morphology varied as a function of the period of the year (weaker effect) and depth (stronger effect) but in different ways for each variable analysed. In general, fronds tended to be shorter, heavier, and more ramified in shallower areas. In relation to time, the morphological characters tended mostly to present higher values in January (summer) and/or April (autumn). Frequency of receptacles did not depend on algal morphology and depth at all but varied in time, although only in the deepest area. Epibiosis also did not depend on algal morphology but varied in relation to time (stronger effect) and, to a lesser extent, depth (weaker effect). The effect of time upon epibiosis also depended on the biological group analysed. These data support the hypothesis that algal morphology varies in relation to period of the year and depth, even under small temporal and spatial environmenal gradients.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic view of a Sargassum cymosum frond showing morphological variables measured in the present study.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Mean values (± SD or SE) of wet weight (g), length (cm), number of primary and secondary branches, and general algal morphology, represented by the first principal component of a principal component analysis (PC1) on all morphological characters (see text for details) of fronds of Sargassum cymosum collected at Lázaro Beach, Fortaleza Bay, in different periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m). Data on frequency of secondary branches with receptacles are also presented. Superscript figures and letters represent the results of the Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) tests for pairwise comparisons among periods of the year and depths, respectively. The SNK for the frequency of secondary branches is related to analysis of covariance using general algal morphology as covariate. Similar superscript labels represent non-significant differences in the test. In the case of significant interaction between seasons and depths the comparisons were made for each depth separately.

Figure 2

Table 1. Two-way model I analysis of variance comparing morphological characteristics of Sargassum cymosum among periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Principal component analysis for the data on morphological characters (wet weight, length, and number of primary and secondary branches) of Sargassum cymosum comparing periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m). The first (PC1) and second (PC2) principal components explained, respectively, 48.9% and 28.4% (total accumulated = 77.3%) of the variation in the original data. (on standardized and square root transformed data).

Figure 4

Table 2. Analysis of similarities for the data on morphological characters (wet weight, length, and number of primary and secondary branches) of Sargassum cymosum comparing periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m).

Figure 5

Table 3. Analysis of covariance comparing the frequency of secondary branches with receptacles of Sargassum cymosum among periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m) using general algal morphology, represented by the first principal component (PC1) of a principal component analysis on all morphological characters, as covariate.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Mean values (± SD or SE) of the rate of epibiosis by Bryozoa, Porifera, branched and highly branched hydrozoas, and filamentous and foliose algae in fronds of Sargassum cymosum collected at Lázaro Beach, Fortaleza Bay, in different periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m). Superscript figures and letters represent the results of the Student–Newman–Keuls tests for pairwise comparisons among periods and depths, respectively, related to analysis of covariance using general algal morphology, represented by the first principal component of a principal component analysis (see text for details) on all morphological characters, as covariate. Similar superscript labels represent non-significant differences in the test. In the case of significant interaction between periods and depths the comparisons were made for each depth separately.

Figure 7

Table 4. Analysis of covariance comparing the epibiosis rate of Bryozoa, Porifera, branched hydrozoans, highly branched hydrozoans, filamentous algae, and foliose algae on Sargassum cymosum among periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m) using general algal morphology, represented by the first principal component (PC1) of a principal component analysis on all morphological characters, as covariate.

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Principal component analysis for the data on epibiosis rate (Bryozoa, Porifera, branched and highly branched hydrozoans, and filamentous and foliose algae) of Sargassum cymosum comparing periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m). The first (PC1) and second (PC2) principal components explained, respectively, 60.7% and 14.9% (total accumulated = 75.6%) of the variation in the original data (on standardized and square root transformed data).

Figure 9

Table 5. Analysis of similarities for the data on epibiosis rate (Bryozoa, Porifera, branched and highly branched hydrozoans, and filamentous and foliose algae) of Sargassum cymosum comparing periods of the year and depths (0.5–1.5 m; 1.5–2.5 m; 2.5–3.5 m).