Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:48:04.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrogenation behavior of Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy and its effect on the microstructure and hot deformability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2017

Tengfei Ma
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Ruirun Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Deshuang Zheng
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Chang Liu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Jingjie Guo
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Hongsheng Ding
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Yanqing Su
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Hengzhi Fu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: ruirunchen@hit.edu.cn

Abstract

The hydrogenation behavior of Ti–44Al–6Nb (at.%) alloy was studied at temperature range of 1373–1693 K, and the effect of hydrogen on hot deformability was tested on Gleeble-1500D thermo-simulation machine. It is found that the lnCH increases linearly with 1/T, and hydrogen content increases with increasing of hydrogen time and flow rate logarithmically. The positive heat of solution of hydrogen denotes that hydrogen absorption in TiAl alloys is an endothermic reaction. The results also show that hydrogen promotes the lamellar colony size and lamellar spacing because that hydrogen can promote the diffusion of elements. There is more residual B2 phase in the hydrogenated alloy revealing that hydrogen stabilizes the B2 phase during hydrogenation. The nanohardness and elastic modulus of the alloy are decreased from 4.4 and 213.5 GPa to 4.2 and 199.8 GPa after hydrogenation with 0.033 wt% H. Thermal simulation results show that the peak stress is decreased by 30% after hydrogenation with 0.033 wt% H which corresponds to decreasing the deformation temperature by about 50 K. This is attributed to hydrogen-promoted dynamic recrystallization and dislocation movement.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Microstructure of as-cast Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy: (a) microstructure by SEM-BSE, (b) TEM image of lamellar.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Quenched microstructures and DSC curve of Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy: (a) 1513 K; (b) 1523 K; (c) 1533 K; (d) 1543 K; (e) 1553 K; (f) DSC curve.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Plot of lnC versus l/T for the Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy.

Figure 3

TABLE I. Heat of solution of hydrogen in different phases.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. H-O analysis of Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy at different temperature.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. Effects of hydrogenation time on hydrogen content for Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. Effect of hydrogen flow rate on hydrogen content at different temperatures for 30 min.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. Microstructure of unhydrogenated and hydrogenated Ti–44Al–6Nb alloys: (a) 1373 K/H, (b) 1473 K/H, (c) 1553 K/H, (d) 1623 K/H, (e) 1693 K/H, (f) 1373 K/Ar, (g) 1473 K/H/Ar, (h) 1553 K/Ar, (i) 1623 K/Ar, (j) 1693 K/Ar.

Figure 8

TABLE II. Lamellar colony size of unhydrogenated and hydrogenated alloys under different temperatures.

Figure 9

FIG. 8. Microstructure of Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy at 1473 K: (a) hydrogenated alloy, (b) unhydrogenated alloy.

Figure 10

TABLE III. EDS results of the hydrogenated alloy and unhydrogenated alloy.

Figure 11

FIG. 9. The lamellar structure of Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy treated at 1473 K: (a) unhydrogenated alloy, (b) hydrogenated alloy.

Figure 12

FIG. 10. XRD results of unhydrogenated and hydrogenated Ti–44Al–6Nb alloys at 1473 K.

Figure 13

TABLE IV. Nanohardness and elastic modulus of unhydrogenated and hydrogenated Ti–44Al–6Nb alloys at 1473 K.

Figure 14

FIG. 11. Hot compressive results of Ti–44Al–6Nb alloy with different hydrogen content: (a) the effect of hydrogen content on true stress–strain curves, (b) the peak stress versus hydrogen content.

Figure 15

FIG. 12. Deformation microstructures of unhydrogenated alloy [(a)–(c)] and hydrogenated alloy [(d)–(f)] at different temperatures under strain rate of 0.01 s−1: (a), (d)1423 K, (b), (e)1473 K, (c), (f)1523 K.

Figure 16

FIG. 13. The deformation microstructure of unhydrogenated and hydrogenated Ti–44Al–6Nb alloys deformed at 1473 K under strain rate of 0.01 s−1: (a), (b) unhydrogenated alloy, (c), (d) hydrogenated alloy.