Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T20:36:04.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagnostic Stewardship: Reducing Urine Cultures by requiring an indication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2026

Judith Strymish
Affiliation:
VA Med Ctr - West Roxbury
Rebecca Madjarov
Affiliation:
VA Boston Healthcare System
Dimitri Drekonja
Affiliation:
Minneapolis VA Health Care System
Erik Stensgard
Affiliation:
Minneapolis VAHCS
Bobbie Masoud
Affiliation:
Minneapolis VAHCS
Scott Connolly
Affiliation:
VA Boston Healthcare System
Anna Chen
Affiliation:
VA Boston Healthcare System
Katherine Linsenmeyer
Affiliation:
VA Boston Healthcare System
Kalpana Gupta
Affiliation:
VA Boston and Boston University School of Medicine

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Background: Inappropriate urine cultures without a clinical indication are sent frequently. Previous work has demonstrated that clinical decision support (CDS) requiring an indication for culture can reduce the number of unnecessary urine cultures. Our multi-campus VA facility implemented requirement of an indication for urine culture orders and evaluated the rate of urine cultures over time as well as the indications. Methods: We implemented a previously developed CDS menu across inpatient and outpatient services within VA Boston healthcare system. The CDS implementation required assistance and approval from our laboratory and clinical applications coordinators. Clinicians were notified about the change in ordering process through email and focused educational sessions. We captured rates of urine cultures by location and by indication and compared rates before and after implementation. A run-in period was allowed for full roll-out of the intervention, which was set at 98% of urine cultures being ordered through the CDS menu. This was a quality improvement initiative. Result: The study period included a 5-month pre-intervention period and a 5-month post-intervention period that followed a 2 month run-in period. A total of 2955 urine cultures were ordered preintervention compared with 2028 cultures postintervention. The average rate of monthly urine cultures decreased from 591/month to 406/month (P Conclusion: We demonstrated a significant reduction in urine culture orders using a clinical decision support intervention that required the ordering clinician to indicate a reason for the order. This intervention only required a targeted modification in our lab orders and was simple for clinicians to comply with given a drop down click menu. One limitation is that we did not capture clinical outcomes - but we did have continuous feedback from clinicians that did not indicate any adverse events, either in efficiency of practice or in outcomes among patients. This approach has been more successful at our hospital compared with other approaches that require system wide changes in urine culture processing or resulting. It has the added benefit of direct clinician education regarding appropriate urine culture indications in different settings.

A table showing changes in average monthly urine cultures across different locations.

A pie chart showing the distribution of urine culture indications during the post-intervention period.

A table showing urine culture indication percentages by location.

Information

Type
Diagnostic Stewardship
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America