Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T02:44:51.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Melting and freezing beneath ice shelves: implications from a three-dimensional ocean-circulation model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. Determann
Affiliation:
Alfred- Wegener-lnstitut für Polar- und Meeresforschunng D-27515 Bremerhaven, Germany
R. Gerdes
Affiliation:
Alfred- Wegener-lnstitut für Polar- und Meeresforschunng D-27515 Bremerhaven, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The thermohaline circulation below a regularly shaped ice shelf comparable in dimensions to the Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica, is investigated by means of a three-dimensional primitive-equation model. To handle the strongly inclined ocean surface as well as the bottom topography, we use scaled coordinates in the vertical direction. Preliminary results of two model versions containing open and closed open-ocean boundaries, respectively, prove the internal circulation is almost independent of the hydrography outside the ice shelf.

Merely driven by the pressure-dependence of the sea-water freezing point (-0.000753 K dbar-1), a stationary circulation pattern evolves, forced by the buoyancy flux due to melting and freezing. The redistribution of ice from deep to shallow ice-shelf drafts resembles the ice-pump mechanism. Its strength depends on the ice-thickness gradients, namely, the differences of the freezing point at the ice-shelf base. As simulated melting and accumulation rates convincingly reproduce the interactions observed at the base of the Ronne Ice Shelf, the present model can act as a tool coupling ice-ocean dynamics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1994
Figure 0

fig.1a Geometric set-up for the three-dimensional ice-shelf cavity. There are no zonal gradients in ice-shelf thickness and bottom topography. Open-ocean boundary at 75° S, grounding line at 80° S. b. T, S distribution serving as open-boundary values for inflow conditions (simplified after Foldvik and others, 1985). The vertical scale is compressed according to different water depths in runs A.C. Cold- and saline-water masses prevail in the west, while warm and less-saline waters occur at the model's eastern margin.

Figure 1

Table 1.Overview on results of model runs A, Band C. The depth difference ΔHice at the ice-shelf base controls the rates of melting (negative) and basal accumulation. The open ocean does not significantly affect the pattern of ice-ocean interaction. Intensified or weakened mean horizontal currents determine the spreading of melting and freezing zones

Figure 2

fig.2Run A, spin-up time. The figure displays level averaged temperatures vs integration time. While the uppermost layer (k = 1) adjusts very fast to the temperature at the ice-shelf base, thermohaline circulation needs decades to ventilate the deeper parts of the cavity.

Figure 3

fig. 3Stream function of the zonally integrated mass transport for experiments (a) B, and (b) C. Contour interval (a) 0.02 Sv (1Sv = 106 m3 .s-1), and (b) 0.01 Sv.

Figure 4

fig. 4Salinity section along the western boundary in experiment C. Contour interval is 0.02 psu (practical salinity units).

Figure 5

fig. 5Stream function of the vertically integrated mass transport P. (a) Run B: contour interval 0.18 Sv; (b) run C: contour interval 0.20 Sv.

Figure 6

fig. 6Basal melting rates derived from model runs (a) B, and (b) C. Melting is quoted negative while basal accumul-ation appears positive. In general, strongest melting occurs in the southeastern comer of the model domain. The diluted plume propagates west, while melting rates decrease. When meeting the western boundary, a northward boundary current is initiated to transport the water, now being coldest, to more shallow ice-Shelf drafts. While rising at the ice-shelf base, the water becomes supercooled. Ice formation is soon initiated and results in maximum rates before the flat part of the ice shelf is reached at 76° S.

Figure 7

fig. 7Stream function of the zonally integrated mass transport for experiment B with open-boundary conditions. Compare Figure 3a. Contour interval 0.02 Sv.

Figure 8

fig. 8Difference between the zonally integrated mass transports of experiment C with open- and closed-boundary conditions. Contour interval 0.001 Sv.