Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T11:17:19.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature-based phenology model for predicting the present and future establishment and distribution of recently invasive Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2021

T. V. Prasad
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana, India
M. Srinivasa Rao*
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana, India
K. V. Rao*
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana, India
S. K. Bal
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana, India
Y. Muttapa
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana, India
J. S. Choudhary
Affiliation:
ICAR-RCER, Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Plandu, Ranchi-834 010, Jharkhand, India
V. K. Singh
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana, India
*
Author for correspondence: M. Srinivasa Rao, Email: msrao909@gmail.com, Ms.rao@icar.gov.in
Author for correspondence: M. Srinivasa Rao, Email: msrao909@gmail.com, Ms.rao@icar.gov.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) is a polyphagous and highly destructive invasive insect pest of many crops. It was recently introduced into India and widely reported in almost all parts of India. Development of a temperature-based phenology model for predicting its rate of development and distribution will help in understanding the establishment and further spread of introduced invasive insect pests. Development, survival and reproduction parameters of S. frugiperda at six constant temperature conditions (15, 20, 25, 27, 30 and 35°C) were investigated and further validated with data generated under fluctuating temperature conditions. The estimated lower developmental threshold temperatures were 12.1°C for eggs, 11°C for larvae, 12.2°C for pupae, 15.13°C for males and 12.66°C for females. Degree-day (DD) requirements for the development of the different stages of S. frugiperda were 50, 250 and 200 DD for egg, larva and pupa, respectively. The best-fitted functions were compiled for each life stage to yield a phenology model, which was stochastically simulated to estimate the life table parameters. The developed phenology model predicted temperature ranges between 27 and 30°C as favourable for S. frugiperda development, survival and reproduction. The results revealed that maximum net reproductive rate (215.66 females/female/generation) and total fecundity (981.08 individuals/female/generation) were attained at 30°C constant temperature. The mean length of generations decreased from 74.29 days at 15°C to 38.74 days at 30°C. The maximum intrinsic rate of increase (0.138 females/female/day) and shortest doubling time (4.9 days) were also observed at 30°C. Results of simulated life table parameters showed high temperature-dependent development of S. frugiperda and complete development within all the tested constant temperature ranges (15–35°C). Simulated life table parameters for predicting risk indices of S. frugiperda in India indicated a significant increase in activity indices and establishment risk indices with a higher number of generations during future (2050 and 2070) climatic change scenarios compared to present conditions. Our results indicate that India will be highly suitable for the establishment and survival of S. frugiperda in future time periods.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Mean development time (days ± SE) of immature and adult life stages of S. frugiperda at different constant temperatures (fitted function: logit for egg, larva, pupa and male; cloglog for female)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Temperature-dependent developmental times (Ln/days) for immature stages of S. frugiperda at different temperatures. Egg (a): larva (b): and pupa (c). Fitted curves: logit model for all immature stages.

Figure 2

Table 2. Parameter values of the functions used for simulation of temperature-dependent phenology of S. frugiperda

Figure 3

Figure 2. Temperature-dependent developmental rates (1/day) for immature stages of S. frugiperda. Egg (a): larva (b): and pupa (c) fitted with modified Sharpe & DeMichele model. The bold solid line is the selected model output and dashed lines above and below represents the upper and lower 95% confidence bands. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Temperature-dependent mortality for immature stages of S. frugiperda. Egg (a): larva (b): and pupa (c) fitted curves with Wang model.

Figure 5

Table 3. Estimated life table parameters of S. frugiperda at different constant temperatures and fluctuating temperature

Figure 6

Figure 4. Life table parameters of S. frugiperda estimated at six constant temperatures. Intrinsic rate of natural increase (a), net reproduction rate (b), gross reproductive rate (c), mean generation time (d), finite rate of increase (e), and doubling time (f).

Figure 7

Figure 5. Model validation. Observed and simulated life stage frequencies of S. frugiperda. Dots represent observed data points at fluctuating experiments, and the lines represent developmental frequencies simulated at fluctuating temperatures based on thermal reaction norms for constant temperatures.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Change in abundance and damage potential of S. frugiperda in India based on establishment risk index (ERI) for (a) present, (b) 2050, (c) 2070, (d) difference between the present and 2050, (e) difference between present and 2070.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Change in abundance and damage potential of S. frugiperda in India based on activity index (AI) for (a) present, (b) 2050, (c) 2070, (d) difference between the present and 2050, (e) difference between present and 2070.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Change in abundance and damage potential of S. frugiperda in India based on generation index (GI) for (a) present, (b) 2050, (c) 2070, (d) difference between the present and 2050, (e) difference between present and 2070.