Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:31:03.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Claytone-ER as a novel rheological additive for enhancing oil-based drilling fluid performance under high-pressure high-temperature conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2025

Ali Mahmoud
Affiliation:
Department of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Rahul Gajbhiye*
Affiliation:
Department of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Salaheldin Elkatatny
Affiliation:
Department of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
*
Corresponding author: Rahul Gajbhiye; Email: rahulg@kfupm.edu.sa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conventional oil drilling fluids often fail under extreme (high-pressure high-temperature, HPHT) conditions, leading to wellbore instability and formation damage, causing substantial economic losses in the drilling industry. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of Claytone-ER, a novel rheological additive for oil-based drilling fluids (OBDF), compared with a conventional organoclay (OC). Claytone-ER improved the drilling fluid performance significantly, including enhancement of the emulsion stability by 3% (863 V to 891 V), mitigation of sagging behavior, and substantial improvement in key rheological parameters such as plastic viscosity (PV) by 26.5%, yield point (YP) by 98%, and apparent viscosity (AV) by 36.5%. Additionally, Claytone-ER enhanced gel strength (GS) and improved filtration properties, reducing filtrate volume by 8% (5.0 cm3 to 4.6 cm3) and filter cake thickness by 6% (2.60 mm to 2.45 mm). These results demonstrated the potential of Claytone-ER to enhance the stability and performance of OBDFs under extreme HPHT conditions, leading to improved drilling efficiency, reduced non-productive time, and cost savings for drilling operations. Furthermore, the enhanced rheological properties, sag resistance, and filtration control contribute to better wellbore stability and minimize the risk of formation damage, ensuring long-term well productivity. This study represents a significant advancement in drilling fluid technology, paving the way for safer and more efficient drilling operations in challenging HPHT environments. Future research will focus on field trials to validate the efficacy of Claytone-ER in real-world HPHT drilling scenarios.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Clay Minerals Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Overview of studies that used OCs in OBDF applications

Figure 1

Table 2. Mud formulation used in this study

Figure 2

Figure 1. XRD pattern of Claytone-ER showing the presence of montmorillonite (Mnt) and illite (Ilt).

Figure 3

Figure 2. XRD pattern of MC-TONE showing the presence of orientite (Ort), cristobalite (Crs), feldspar (Fsp), and calcite (Cal).

Figure 4

Table 3. XRF analysis results for the OCs used in this study

Figure 5

Figure 3. Particle-size distribution for Claytone-ER and MC-TONE.

Figure 6

Figure 4. SEM images of (A) Claytone-ER and (B) MC-TONE.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Elemental composition from EDS for (A) Claytone-ER and (B) MC-TONE.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Effect of Claytone-ER on electrical stability.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Sag factors under static conditions.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Comparison of VSST values for MC-TONE and Claytone-ER. The dashed line indicates the upper limit of the safe operating range for optimal drilling fluid performance.

Figure 11

Figure 9. Oscillatory amplitude tests.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Oscillatory frequency tests.

Figure 13

Figure 11. Time sweep tests.

Figure 14

Figure 12. Effect of Claytone-ER on stress–strain relationship at 135°C.

Figure 15

Figure 13. Effect of Claytone-ER on plastic viscosity at 135°C.

Figure 16

Figure 14. Effect of Claytone-ER on yield point and apparent viscosity at 135°C.

Figure 17

Figure 15. Effect of Claytone-ER on gel strength at 135°C.

Figure 18

Figure 16. Effect of Claytone-ER on filtration volume at 135°C.

Figure 19

Figure 17. Effect of Claytone-ER on filter cake thickness at 135°C.