Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:48:47.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-process composition and biological responses of laser sintered PMMA and β-TCP composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2018

Rajkumar Velu
Affiliation:
Additive Manufacturing Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
Banu Pradheepa Kamarajan
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore 641004, India
Muthusamy Ananthasubramanian
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore 641004, India
Truc Ngo
Affiliation:
Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, University of San Diego, San Diego, California 92110, USA
Sarat Singamneni*
Affiliation:
Additive Manufacturing Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: sarat.singamneni@aut.ac.nz

Abstract

PMMA/β-TCP composites were evaluated to be suitable for laser sintering earlier, but the possible after effects are not known yet. Effects of sintering on the biological nature and the influences of critical compositions and process parameters have not been investigated so far. The current research attempts this, first identifying experimentally the most suitable laser process conditions for the specific grades of PMMA and β-TCP and then subjecting single layer sintered samples to FTIR analysis and in vitro studies involving MTT and ALP assays, alizarin red S tests, and real-time PCR analyses. While the laser interactions are not detrimental, the biological responses are generally positive proving the selective laser sintering of PMMA/β-TCP composites to be a potential approach for specific medical applications.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Genes and their primer sequences used for RT-PCR.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. DSC curves.

Figure 2

TABLE II. Kinematic parameters of PMMA and PMMA/β-TCP composites derived from the DSC curves.

Figure 3

TABLE III. Material and process parameter combinations used for the printed test pieces.

Figure 4

FIG. 2. SEM photomicrographs of single layer sintered specimens (accelerating voltage 15 kV).

Figure 5

FIG. 3. Percent porosity with varying PMMA/β-TCP compositions.

Figure 6

FIG. 4. FTIR results based on neat PMMA powder and sintered samples of PMMA and β-TCP varying compositions.

Figure 7

FIG. 5. Results of the MTT assay with varying compositions. “*”—significant difference (P < 0.005) compared to the control; “**”—significant difference (P < 0.005) compared to PMMA; “#”—significant difference (P < 0.005) compared to 5% β-TCP/95% PMMA; “##”—significant difference (P < 0.005) compared to 10% β-TCP/90% PMMA; “&”—significant difference (P < 0.005) compared to 15% β-TCP/85% PMMA. The 20% β-TCP/80% PMMA has no statistical significance compared to the remaining samples.

Figure 8

FIG. 6. Results of the ALP assay. Bars represent standard deviation. Statistical significance (P < 0.005) is represented using *.

Figure 9

FIG. 7. Photographic images of alizarin red S staining results with varying composition.

Figure 10

FIG. 8. Representative graphical images of relative gene expression of (a) collagen type I, (b) OPN, and (c) OCN with GAPDH as the reference in the MG 63 cell line. Statistical significance (P < 0.005) is represented using *.