Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:09:07.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A 260-GHz on-chip cavity-backed slot antenna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2018

Jun Xiao
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Work Safety Intelligent Monitoring, Beijing 100876, China
Zihang Qi
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Work Safety Intelligent Monitoring, Beijing 100876, China
Xiuping Li*
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Work Safety Intelligent Monitoring, Beijing 100876, China
Weiwei Feng
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Work Safety Intelligent Monitoring, Beijing 100876, China
Hua Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Work Safety Intelligent Monitoring, Beijing 100876, China
*
Author for correspondence: Xiuping Li, E-mail: xpli@bupt.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a cavity-backed dual-slot antenna in 0.13-μm SiGe BiCMOS technology. The dual-slot structure is excited by a cross-shaped strip line and a cavity which is formed by the topmost metal layer connected to the bottom metal layer through vias in between. By adopting dual-slot and cross-shaped feed line, the bandwidth is significantly enhanced by 196% compared with the single-slot antenna with straight feed line. The reason for bandwidth enhancement has been analyzed. The proposed antenna shows a measured impedance bandwidth of 15.2 GHz from 248.2 to 263.4 GHz for |S11| < −10 dB. The simulated and measured peak gains of the cavity-backed dual-slot antenna are −1.3 and −2.1 dBi, respectively. The simulated radiation efficiency is 31.1%. The total size of the antenna is 0.46 mm × 0.48 mm.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Lateral view of the chip environment.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The geometry of the cavity-backed single-slot antenna (not to scale). (a) Three-dimensional view of the antenna. (b) Top view of the antenna. (c) Cross-section view of the antenna.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simulated reflection coefficients of the single-slot antennas with and without SIW cavity.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Reflection coefficients of dual-slot antennas with different Ls1.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) H-field vector distribution at 262.5 GHz in the cavity of the single-slot antenna. (b) Dominant E-field isoline of a hybrid mode at 262.5 GHz.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. The geometry of the cavity-backed dual-slot antenna (not to scale). (a) Top view of the antenna. (b) Three-dimensional view of the antenna. (c) Cross-section view of the antenna.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Simulated reflection coefficients of the cavity-backed dual-slot antenna with cross-shaped feed line and cavity-backed single-slot antenna with straight feedline.

Figure 7

Table 1. Optimized parameters of the on-chip cavity-backed dual-slot antenna

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Four referenced antennas. (a) Cavity-backed dual-slot antenna with straight feed line. (b) Cavity-backed single (long) slot antenna with cross-shaped feed line. (c) Cavity-backed single (short) slot antenna with straight feed line. (d) Cavity-backed single (short) slot antenna with cross-shaped feed line.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Simulated reflection coefficients of four referenced antennas and the proposed cavity-backed dual-slot antenna.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Hybrid equivalent model of the proposed cavity-backed dual-slot antenna.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. H-field vector distributions at 265 GHz of the hybrid equivalent model.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Two kinds of via hole-simulated models (not to scale). (a) Used in Ref. [9]. (b) Used in this paper.

Figure 13

Table 2. Dimensions of different types via holes used in this paper

Figure 14

Table 3. Comparison of optimized parameter values in [9] and in this paper (unit: μm)

Figure 15

Fig. 13. Micrograph of the fabricated cavity-backed dual-slot antenna.

Figure 16

Fig. 14. Schematic diagram of the measurement setup.

Figure 17

Fig. 15. Simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the antennas in this paper and Ref. [9].

Figure 18

Fig. 16. Simulated and measured gain of the proposed cavity-backed dual-slot antenna.

Figure 19

Fig. 17. Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed cavity-backed dual-slot antenna at 260 GHz. (a) E (xoz)-plane. (b) H (yoz)-plane.