Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:53:32.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population genetics of the wheat curl mite (Aceria tosichella Keifer) in Australia: implications for the management of wheat pathogens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

A.D. Miller*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010Australia School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, 3280Australia
P.A. Umina
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010Australia
A.R. Weeks
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010Australia
A.A. Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010Australia Department of Genetics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010Australia
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +61 3 8344 2279 E-mail: admiller@unimelb.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The wheat curl mite (WCM), Aceria tosichella Keifer, is a polyphagous eriophyoid mite and the primary vector of wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) and five other viral pathogens in cereals. Previous research using molecular markers and a series of laboratory experiments found A. tosichella in Australia to consist of two genetically distinct lineages, which have broad overlapping distributions and differ in their ability to transmit WSMV under controlled conditions. This pattern of transmission also appears to be apparent in the field, whereby a strong association between WSMV detection and a single WCM lineage has been detected. In this study, we conduct a population genetic analysis and provide information on the genetic structure of the Australian viruliferous WCM lineage. We assessed genetic differentiation of 16 WCM populations using nine microsatellite markers. Strong evidence for extensive gene flow and low genetic structuring throughout the Australian wheatbelt was evident, with an exception for Western Australian and far north Queensland populations that appear to be genetically isolated. The data also indicate genetic patterns consistent with an arrhenotokous parthenogenetic mode of reproduction. Implications of these findings are discussed with reference to the management of WCM and associated cereal pathogens in Australia and overseas.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map depicting sites in Australia that were sampled for Aceria tosichella.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sample locality details and mites numbers collected from respective sites.

Figure 2

Table 2. Characteristics of polymorphic microsatellite loci.

Figure 3

Table 3. Statistics for Aceria tosichella populations screened with nine microsatellite loci assessing potential females (diploid dataset) only. Mean values over loci are presented for number of alleles (r), allelic richness (a), observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosities, inbreeding (FIS), Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P values.

Figure 4

Table 4. Pairwise genetic distances among A. tosichella populations. Pairwise ϕPT for the haploid dataset is shown in the upper diagonal, with pairwise FST for the diploid dataset presented in the lower diagonal. FST and ϕPT values shown in bold are significant (P<0.001) after 10,000 permutations and corrections for multiple comparisons.

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Principle components analysis by population for A. tosichella for (a) the diploid and (b) haploid datasets. Each point represents a single population. ◊, Queensland; ⧫, New South Wales; ●, Victoria; ○, Tasmania; ∆, South Australia; ▲, Western Australia. Variation explained by the first factor=65.94% and 65.94%, respectively.

Figure 6

Fig. 3. (a) and (b) Regression analysis for A. tosichella diploid, and (c) and (d) haploid datasets datasets plotting pairwise Slatkin's linearised FST/ϕPT against the natural log of the pairwise geographical distance (km). All populations are included in the analysis shown in (a) and (c), while Koorda and Emerald populations are excluded from the analysis represented in (b) and (d). Scores for the accompanying mantel tests for (a), (b), (c) and (d) are r=0.62, P=0.003; r=–0.07, P=0.315; r=0.63, P=0.001; r=0.20, P=0.066, respectively.

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Individuals assigned to three populations by Structurama Bayesian cluster analysis of the diploid (A: Pr(K=3|X)=0.27) and haploid (B: Pr(K=3|X)=0.59) datasets. Sample locations presented on X-axis with coloured bars representing Australian states (blue, Queensland; red, New South Wales; green, Victoria; Purple, Tasmania; grey, South Australia; orange, Western Australia).

Figure 8

Fig. 5. GENELAND maps of posterior probabilities of population membership and spatial representation population genetic structure for A. tosichella. Lighter areas indicate higher probabilities of population membership and contour lines represent genetic discontinuities between populations. Maps A, B and C represent individual assignments for K=3 (haploid dataset), while map D represents a nested fourth population in eastern Australia supported only by the diploid dataset (K=4).