Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:15:39.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Litter as a filter of emergence for herbaceous seedlings and sporophytes in central Amazonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Flávio Rogério de Oliveira Rodrigues*
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Ecology, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida Efigênio Salles, 2239, Adrianópolis, CEP 69011-970, Manaus, AM, Brazil
Flávia Regina Capellotto Costa
Affiliation:
Coordenação de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida Efigênio Salles, 2239, Adrianópolis, CEP 69011-970, Manaus, AM, Brazil
*
1Corresponding author. Email: frdor85@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We conducted a study in 30 plots distributed uniformly in an area of 25 km2 at Ducke Reserve, Manaus, to test the hypothesis that understorey herb richness and abundance are mediated by litter, manipulating experimentally the amount of litter in the field. Over 10 mo, we followed the emergence of herbaceous seedlings and sporophytes in control, litter-addition and litter-exclusion treatments, covering an area of 1.2 m2 per plot in each treatment. We also assessed the relationship between topography and litter depth and frequency of bare-soil patches; and the influence of density of reproductive individuals on the emergence of herbs. Litter depth decreased, and the frequency of bare-soil patches increased with terrain slope in the wet season, but were not related with the soil clay content. Neither was related to the topography in the dry season. Emergence of pteridophytes was four times higher in the litter-exclusion treatment (3.7 ± 1.1 individuals m−2) than in the litter-addition treatment (0.9 ± 0.28 indiv. m−2) and increased with soil clay content. Seedlings from monocot herbs emerged twice more frequently in the litter exclusion (0.71 ± 0.25 indiv. m−2) than in the litter-addition treatment (0.33 ± 0.11 indiv. m−2), and also more in sites with high density of fruiting plants. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that regeneration of herbs with very small propagules is strongly affected by the physical barrier imposed by litter. Given that litter is shallower on slopes during the wet season, this creates a pattern of higher density and richness of pteridophytes in these areas. Monocot herbs, although also limited by litter, were more highly limited by availability of propagules, and their distribution patterns are at least in part explained by dispersal limitation. We conclude that litter is an important causal factor behind the herb distribution patterns along topographical gradients.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the 30 plots used in the experiment on emergence in the litter treatments. Each plot is 250 m long and follows the terrain contour. The stars represent the points where the experimental blocks were installed. A = Litter addition, C = Control, E = Litter exclusion. Figure adapted from a line drawing by Karl Mokross.

Figure 1

Table 1. List of species, morphometric measurements and the absolute number of pteridophyte sporophytes emerging (P) and seedlings emerging of monocot herbs (MH) in the litter treatments. A = Litter addition, C = Control, E = Litter exclusion. Species with morphometric measurements based on INPA herbarium collections (1); on field collections at Reserva Ducke (2); and the literature: Simpson (2006) (3); Davidse et al. (2004) (4); Kennedy et al. (1988) (5). Species without information (6).

Figure 2

Table 2. Effects of the litter amount (experimentally manipulated), soil clay content, number of reproductive adults (NRA) and the interaction between treatments and clay content on the number of emerging herb seedlings and pteridophyte sporophytes. The table shows the results of an ANOVA (Emergence = Litter + Clay Content + Interaction (Clay content × Litter) + NRA), using GLM, with 30 replicates of the litter treatments. Litter was a categorical variable with three levels: litter addition (A), control (C) and litter removal (E). Clay content was treated as a covariate independent of treatments.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Number of emerging individuals among treatments for the total emergence (a), pteridophytes (b) and monocot herbs (c). A = Litter addition, C = Control, E = Litter exclusion. The boxes represent the interval between 25th and 75th percentiles in the number of emerging individuals. The median (horizontal lines inside boxes) represent 50th percentile and whiskers minimum and maximum values of the data. The points above the boxes represent outliers. Different letters indicate treatments with significantly different averages. * < 0.05; ** < 0.01.

Figure 4

Figure 3. The path analysis model for the emergence of seedlings from monocot herbs. Arrows indicate a direct relationship, followed by the standardized regression coefficient. The indirect effects are shown by bold lines. NRA = Number of reproductive adults.