Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T00:49:40.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrogen in oxide semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2012

Matthew D. McCluskey*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2814
Marianne C. Tarun
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2814
Samuel T. Teklemichael
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2814
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: mattmcc@wsu.edu

Abstract

Oxide semiconductors exhibit a range of physical properties and have potential optical, electronic, and energy applications. Transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) are currently used in products such as flat-panel displays. The prevailing n-type conductivity in these materials has historically been attributed to native defects such as oxygen vacancies. Recent calculations and experiments, however, have provided evidence that native defects are actually not responsible in majority of the cases. Hydrogen, on the other hand, does act as a shallow donor and can dramatically affect the electrical properties of oxides. In addition to contributing to n-type doping, hydrogen also passivates dangling bonds in cation vacancies and passivates acceptor dopants. Some oxides contain “hidden hydrogen,” perhaps H2 molecules, which dissociate at elevated temperatures. In this article, the many roles of hydrogen in zinc oxide, tin dioxide, titanium dioxide, indium (III) oxide, gallium (III) oxide, and strontium titanate are reviewed. The emphasis is on fundamental electronic, structural, and vibrational properties of hydrogen complexes, as determined by experiment and theory.

Information

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

FIG. 1.Alignment of the H(+/−) level for interstitial hydrogen in various semiconductors. LDA calculations were performed by Kiliç and Zunger27 and Van de Walle and Neugebauer.26 Muon implantation experiments are from Lichti, Chow, and Cox.28

Figure 1

FIG. 2.Free-electron density and O–H peak area for interstitial hydrogen donors in ZnO, at room temperature. The decay over time shows that interstitial donors are unstable.50 Inset: O–H absorption peak at 8 K and 300 K.

Figure 2

FIG. 3.IR spectra (8 K) of N–H pairs in ZnO, for samples grown in 14NH3, 15NH3, or a mixture of 14ND3 and 15NH3.61 The higher mass of the 15N isotope results in a slightly lower vibrational frequency. N-D peaks are not shown. Inset: ball-and-stick model.62

Figure 3

FIG. 4.IR spectra (10 K) of O–H peaks from interstitial hydrogen donors and defect-hydrogen complexes in SnO2.80 The top spectrum was taken after an 11 day “anneal” at room temperature.

Figure 4

FIG. 5.Perovskite structure of SrTiO3.

Figure 5

FIG. 6.IR absorption spectra (200 K) of O-D and O-H peaks in deuterated SrTiO3.109 Two different complexes are labeled HI and HII. Above 500 °C, the D atoms are replaced by H, which come from a “hidden hydrogen reservoir” in the sample.