Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:59:43.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential patterns of activity and functional connectivity in emotion processing neural circuitry to angry and happy faces in adolescents with and without suicide attempt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2013

L. A. Pan*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
S. Hassel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
A. M. Segreti
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
S. A. Nau
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
D. A. Brent
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
M. L. Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Psychological Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: L. A. Pan, M.D., Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Loeffler Building, 121 Meyran Avenue, Room 304, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. (Email: thomasla@upmc.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Neural substrates of emotion dysregulation in adolescent suicide attempters remain unexamined.

Method

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure neural activity to neutral, mild or intense (i.e. 0%, 50% or 100% intensity) emotion face morphs in two separate emotion-processing runs (angry and happy) in three adolescent groups: (1) history of suicide attempt and depression (ATT, n = 14); (2) history of depression alone (NAT, n = 15); and (3) healthy controls (HC, n = 15). Post-hoc analyses were conducted on interactions from 3 group × 3 condition (intensities) whole-brain analyses (p < 0.05, corrected) for each emotion run.

Results

To 50% intensity angry faces, ATT showed significantly greater activity than NAT in anterior cingulate gyral–dorsolateral prefrontal cortical attentional control circuitry, primary sensory and temporal cortices; and significantly greater activity than HC in the primary sensory cortex, while NAT had significantly lower activity than HC in the anterior cingulate gyrus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. To neutral faces during the angry emotion-processing run, ATT had significantly lower activity than NAT in the fusiform gyrus. ATT also showed significantly lower activity than HC to 100% intensity happy faces in the primary sensory cortex, and to neutral faces in the happy run in the anterior cingulate and left medial frontal gyri (all p < 0.006,corrected). Psychophysiological interaction analyses revealed significantly reduced anterior cingulate gyral–insula functional connectivity to 50% intensity angry faces in ATT v. NAT or HC.

Conclusions

Elevated activity in attention control circuitry, and reduced anterior cingulate gyral–insula functional connectivity, to 50% intensity angry faces in ATT than other groups suggest that ATT may show inefficient recruitment of attentional control neural circuitry when regulating attention to mild intensity angry faces, which may represent a potential biological marker for suicide risk.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic information and clinical variablesa

Figure 1

Table 2. Medication

Figure 2

Fig. 1. (a) Whole-brain 3 × 3 analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) identifying differences of the effect of intensity difference when viewing 50% intensity angry faces covarying for age in all groups. Suicide attempters (ATT) > depressed non-attempters (NAT) in the right anterior cingulate gyrus [Brodmann area (BA) 32, p = 0.0047], bilateral primary sensory cortices (BA 4, left, p = 0.00004, right, p = 0.002), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 9, p = 0.0002) and the right middle temporal gyrus (BA 21, p = 0.001). ATT > healthy controls (HC) in the left primary sensory cortex (BA 4, p = 0.001). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. The brain image shown is the 3 × 1 contrast for 50% intensity angry faces. Sagittal image: green = right anterior temporal gyrus (BA 32). Coronal image: blue = left primary sensory cortex (BA 4); purple = right primary sensory cortex (BA 4). Horizontal image: pink = left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 9); light blue = right middle temporal gyrus (BA 21). (b) ATT show significantly lower functional connectivity between the right anterior cingulate gyrus and bilateral insulae when viewing 50% intensity angry faces than NAT (left, p = 0.002 and right, p = 0.0001) and HC (left, p = 0.0001 and right, p = 0.008). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. The left insula is shown at the top of the image (blue); the right insula is shown at the bottom (green).

Figure 3

Table 3. Whole-brain 3 × 3 ANCOVA group (ATT, NAT, HC) × condition (A100, A50, AN) covarying for age

Figure 4

Table 4. Whole-brain 3 × 3 ANCOVA group (ATT, NAT, HC) × condition (H100, H50, HN) covarying for age

Figure 5

Table 5. PPI activation with right anterior cingulate gyrus BA 32 as the seed region: 3 × 1 main effect of group (ATT, NAT, HC) × condition (A50)

Supplementary material: File

Pan Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Pan Supplementary Material(File)
File 208.4 KB