Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:45:48.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coplanar waveguide-fed ISM band implantable crossed-type triangular slot antenna for biomedical applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2013

Srinivasan Ashok Kumar*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry, India. Phone: +919750140862
Thangavelu Shanmuganantham
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry, India. Phone: +919750140862
*
Corresponding author: S. Ashok Kumar Email: ashokape@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A novel coplanar waveguide fed Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band implantable crossed-type triangular slot antenna is proposed for biomedical applications. The antenna operates at the center frequency of 2450 MHz, which is in ISM band, to support GHz wideband communication for high-data rate implantable biomedical application. The size of the antenna is 78 mm3 (10 mm × 12 mm × 0.65 mm). The simulated and measured bandwidths are 7.9 and 8.2% at the resonant frequency of 2.45 GHz. The specific absorption rate distribution induced by the implantable antenna inside a human body tissue model is evaluated. The communication between the implanted antenna and external device is also examined. The proposed antenna has substantial merits such as miniaturization, lower return loss, better impedance matching, and high gain over other implanted antennas.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Proposed antenna structure.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Proposed antenna simulation setup model.

Figure 2

Table 1. Electrical properties of human tissue at 2.45 GHz.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Fabrication of proposed antenna.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Measurement setup for proposed antenna.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Photograph of measurement setup.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Return loss versus frequency.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Current distribution.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Radiation pattern for E-plane: (a) co polarization, (b) Cross-polarization.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Radiation pattern for H-plane (a) co polarization (b) cross-polarization.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Simulated proposed antenna gain.

Figure 11

Table 2. Comparison of simulated and measured results.