Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T02:05:37.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Avifauna and biogeographical affinities of a carrasco-dominated landscape in north-eastern Brazil: providing baseline data for future monitoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2021

HEVANA SANTANA DE LIMA*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia & Evoluçao de Aves, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal UFPE, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Nelson Chaves, s/n - Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
FLOR MARIA GUEDES LAS-CASAS
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia & Evoluçao de Aves, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Ciências Biológicas, Centro de Estudos Superiores de Zé Doca, Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, Rua Rio Branco, s/n – Centro, Zé Doca, Maranhão, Brazil.
JONATHAN RAMOS RIBEIRO
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia & Evoluçao de Aves, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
WEBER ANDRADE GIRÃO
Affiliation:
AQUASIS, Associação de Pesquisa e Preservação de Ecossistemas Aquáticos, Caucaia, Ceará, Brazil.
DANIELE MARIZ
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia & Evoluçao de Aves, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
LUCIANO N. NAKA
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia & Evoluçao de Aves, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
*
*Author for correspondence; e-mail: hevana.lima@ufpe.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The carrasco is a dense, shrubby vegetation type that covers the higher parts of table-top mountains in north-eastern Brazil. The vegetation of this phytophysiognomy is often considered to have biogeographical and ecological affinities with the cerrado of Central Brazil, but the biogeographical affinities of its avifauna remain unclear. In recent years, deforestation due to local economic activities has been particularly severe in some carrasco-dominated landscapes. In 2013, we initiated avian surveys at the Fazenda Pau D‘Arco, a privately owned property located on top of the Araripe Plateau, to evaluate the effects of a legal forest management program on the avifauna. Here, we present the results of four years of avian inventories to: i) characterize a well-preserved patch of carrasco vegetation; ii) assess avian biogeographical affinities of this vegetation type; iii) identify associations between managed/unmanaged areas and bird species; and iv) provide baseline data for future avian monitoring studies. Using different survey methods, we provide a list of 148 bird species, including several dry-forest specialists and caatinga endemics. Biogeographically, the avifauna of the carrasco represents a subsample of the Caatinga dry forest, lacking cerrado elements. Forest management significantly affected the distribution of several bird species in the study area. We found that 1/5 of the species (24) recorded during our standardized surveys were significantly associated with either unmanaged (14 species) or managed (10 species) areas. Species such as the Ceará Leaftosser Sclerurus cearensis, a globally vulnerable species, have only been detected in non-managed areas and therefore can be negatively affected by the management program. We also present data on 16 avian taxa with ecological and conservation concerns. By presenting a fairly complete and documented list of the avifauna, we characterize the carrasco avifauna and offer the tools to evaluate the effects of forest management on this poorly known vegetation type.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of South America, highlighting the caatinga Dry Forest (light green), the cerrado (dark green), and the distribution of the carrasco vegetation (in yellow); adapted from Araújo (1998). In detail, the Fazenda Pau D’Arco, with the 162 sampling points where we conducted point counts (all dots) and the 115 sampling points where we conducted mobbing experiments (black dots). The white line represents the main dirt road that gives access to the entire area, numbered lines (1 to 12) represent secondary roads that give access to the management plots. Red plots represent areas that had already been managed by the time of the beginning of our study (2014), whereas green plots represent unmanaged areas. RL1 and RL2 represent unmanaged control areas (Reserve Legal).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Map of geographic localities selected to compare species similarity between and within biomes, (b) Multidimensional scaling, and (c) Cluster analysis showing the avian similarity between the Fazenda Pau D’Arco and 11 caatinga and seven cerrado localities. We indicate Jaccard’s index values next to the localities’ names (a). Dark green values represent more similar and light green values more dissimilar areas, in relation to carrasco avifauna.

Figure 2

Table 1. Indicator Species Analysis (ISA) showing species with significant associations with unmanaged and managed areas, including individual records and p values. The total number of areas in our surveys included 84 unmanaged and 57 managed points. IndVal refers to the Indicator Value index measuring the association between a species and a site group.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Local distribution maps of selected species at the Fazenda Pau D’Arco. Each point represents a sampling point surveyed by quantitative censuses (point counts) and mobbing experiments. Light green points with a white border represent presence points, whereas dark green points depict the absence of records.

Supplementary material: File

De Lima et al. supplementary material

De Lima et al. supplementary material 1

Download De Lima et al. supplementary material(File)
File 56.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

De Lima et al. supplementary material

De Lima et al. supplementary material 2

Download De Lima et al. supplementary material(File)
File 94.3 KB