Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T21:15:00.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fate determination of adult human glial progenitor cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2009

Fraser J. Sim
Affiliation:
Center for Translational Neuromedicine, and the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
Martha S. Windrem
Affiliation:
Center for Translational Neuromedicine, and the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
Steven A. Goldman*
Affiliation:
Center for Translational Neuromedicine, and the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Steven A. Goldman, Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 645, Rochester, NY, USA phone: 14642 585-275-9588 email: Steven_Goldman@urmc.rochester.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glial progenitor cells (GPCs) comprise the most abundant population of progenitor cells in the adult human brain. They are responsible for central nervous system (CNS) remyelination, and likely contribute to the astrogliotic response to brain injury and degeneration as well. Adult human GPCs are biased to differentiate as oligodendrocytes and elaborate new myelin, and yet they retain multilineage plasticity, and can give rise to neurons as well as astrocytes and oligodendrocytes once removed from the adult parenchymal environment. GPCs retain strong mechanisms for cell-autonomous self-renewal, and yet both their phenotype and fate may be dictated by their microenvironment. Using the transcriptional profiles of acutely isolated GPCs, we have begun to understand the operative ligand–receptor interactions involved in these processes, and have identified several key signaling pathways by which adult human GPCs may be reliably instructed to either oligodendrocytic or astrocytic fate. In addition, we have noted significant differences between the expressed genes and dominant signaling pathways of fetal and adult human GPCs, as well as between rodent and human GPCs. The latter data in particular call into question therapeutic strategies predicated solely upon data obtained using rodents, while perhaps highlighting the extent to which evolution has been attended by the phylogenetic modification of glial phenotype and function.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Glial progenitor cell (GPC) implants remyelinate the congenitally unmyelinated shiverer brain. (A) One year-old shiverer mouse, transplanted at birth with 3 × 105 human GPCs, stained for myelin basic protein (MBP, green). (B) cerebellum, sagittal section, one year-old transplanted shiverer; MBP, green, human nuclei (hN), red, DAPI, blue. (C) Human glial progenitors differentiate as MBP+ oligodendrocytes in the corpus callosum; MBP, green; human nuclei, red. (D) Myelinated fibers corpus callosum, year-old mouse, coronal; MBP, green; neurofilament (NF), red. (E) Normalization of nodal architecture at nodes of Ranvier, sagittal section of cervical spinal cord; caspr2, green; contactin, blue; ßIV-spectrin, red. (F) Electron micrograph of myelinated axons in the spinal cord (year-old shiverer). (G) Kaplan–Meier graph survival plot reveals the overall extension of survival and specific rescue of a fraction of transplanted shi/shi mice. From Ben-Hur and Goldman (2008).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Adult human WMPC were multipotential giving rise to functionally mature neuronsin vitro. (A) First-passage spheres generated from A2B5-sorted cells 2 weeks after sorting. (B) Second-passage sphere derived from an A2B5-sorted sample, at 3 weeks. (C) Once plated onto substrate, the primary spheres differentiated into βIII-tubulin+ neurons (red), GFAP+ astrocytes (blue) and O4+ oligodendrocytes (green). (D–F) Neurons derived from white matter progenitor cells expressed a GABAergic phenotype. (D) The outgrowth of a WMPC-derived neurosphere, stained for neuronal βIII-tubulin after 35 DIV (21 days in serum-free media with FGF/NT3/PDGF, then 14 days in 2% FBS with 20 ng/ml BDNF). (E) Concurrent immunostaining for GAD67, indicating that all nine neurons in the field are GAD67+, and thus likely GABAergic neurons. (C) DAPI nuclear labeling reveals the abundance of cells in the field. (G–I) White matter progenitor cell-derived neurons developed neuronal Ca2+ responses to depolarization. (G) Shows an image of WMPC-derived cells loaded with the calcium indicator dye fluo-3, 10 days after plating of first passage spheres derived from A2B5-sorted white matter (35 DIV total); many fiber-bearing cells of both neuronal and glial morphologies are apparent. (H) Same field after exposure to 100 µM glutamate, and (I) after exposure to a depolarizing stimulus of 60 mM KCl. The neurons displayed rapid, reversible, >100% elevations in cytosolic calcium in response to K+, consistent with the activity of neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels. Scale = 80 µm. (J,K) Whole cell patch-clamp revealed voltage-gated sodium currents and action potentials in WMPC-derived neurons. (J) A representative cell 14 days after plating of a first passage sphere derived from A2B5-sorted white matter. The cell was patch clamped in a voltage-clamped configuration, and its responses to current injection recorded. (K) The fast negative deflections noted after current injection are typical of the voltage-gated sodium currents of mature neurons. Action potentials were noted only at INa > 800 pA. Modified from Nunes et al. (2003).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Directed induction of GPC fate commitment via PTPRZ1 and BMP pathways. (A) Dose response curves of the proportion of A2B5-defined progenitors versus O4-defined oligodendrocytes, as a function of bpV(phen) dose. (B) Plots the respective incidences of A2B5+ progenitors and O4+ oligodendrocytes as a function of lentiviral PTPRZ1 shRNAi treatment (±SEM, n = 4). (C) GPCs treated with 25 ng/ml bpV(phen) for 7 days in vitro were stained for O4. (D) Plots the proportion of GFAP+A2B5− identified astrocytes as a function of time after addition of either 0, 5 or 50 ng/ml BMP4. (E,F) Show the pronounced induction of a GFAP+A2B5− astrocytic phenotype by 50 ng/ml BMP4, when assessed at 7 DIV. *Indicates significant difference, p < 0.01. Scale bar, 10 µm. Modified from Sim et al. (2006).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Whole transcriptome analysis of adult human glial progenitors. Adult human glial progenitors were isolated from patients with medically refractory epilepsies, using immunomagnetic cell sorting (MACS) based on A2B5-immunoreactivity. The Affymetrix U133+2 microarray expression profiles of these A2B5+ GPCs were then compared to profiles generated from matched unsorted white and gray matter dissociates, as well as to the profiles of GLT1-sorted astrocytes and CD11b-sorted microglial cells. Initial exploratory data analysis employed both principal component analysis (A) and hierarchical clustering of the Euclidean distances (B) between samples of informative probe sets, from RMA-normalized data. Clear distinctions between each cell population were noted. (C) The expression of cell type-specific marker genes illustrates the relative enrichment of GPC, microglial and astrocytic genes, in A2B5, CD11b and GLT sorted cells, respectively (heatmap: red = high expression; green = lower expression). END = endothelial, NPC = neural progenitor cell, NSC = neural stem cell. (D) Differential gene expression was performed using linear modeling, as an empirical Bayes test statistic with >3-fold change and 5% FDR cut-offs. The gene expression of each cell type was compared to that of the tissue dissociate from which it derived. The number of individual differentially expressed probe sets are shown in the Venn diagram. Although there is some overlap of A2B5+ GPC and GLT1+ astrocyte profiles, the three cell populations are clearly distinct from one another.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The gene expression patterns of human and mouse adult GPCs differ significantly. (A) Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the original U95 array format-based analysis of human GPCs against the current U133+2 profiles. Raw probe set data were annotated to provide unique gene identifiers, and then ranked according to the significance of differential gene expression in human A2B5+ cells relative to unsorted white and gray matter dissociates (U133+2 data, x-axis). The black line starting at the origin represents whether or not each mtaching gene was deemed significant in the U95 analysis (Sim et al., 2006), moving up one position if significant and to right if not significant. The red line indicates the line of no discrimination, representing random gene selection. A perfect predictor of significance of the U95-derived gene list in the U133+2 data set would be represented as an inverted ‘L’ shape. the upward deflection of the line thus indicates the extent of overlap between the two profiles. This is quantified as area under the curve (AUC) and partial AUC at 20% FDR (pAUC). The high values for both indicates that the U95 data closely agree with the U133 data, even at high specificity. (B,C) Comparison of human and mouse GPC transcript profiles. (B) Venn analysis of the overlap of human (U133) and mouse (Barres) GPC-specific genes. A total of 557 unique human homologs of mouse GPC-specific genes were found in the human array data. While 92 of these were significantly differentially expressed by human A2B5+ GPCs, another group of over 200 genes were significantly expressed in human GPCs, yet not detectable in mouse cells. (C) ROC analysis comparing the human and mouse profiles revealed that the mouse GPC profile was distinct from their human counterpart. At 20% FDR (dashed line), the human U95 genelist is >80% sensitive (green line) whereas the mouse profile showed only approximately 50% sensitivity (black line). This suggested that while the mouse GPC profiles generally resembled those of human GPCs, there were nonetheless abundant substantive differences between the two, with ample evidence of species-specific gene expression in both mouse and human GPCs.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Gene set enrichment analysis identifies the sterol synthesis pathway as especially prominent in adult human GPCs. Pathway analysis was performed using the Biocarta database of curated cell–cell signaling pathways (www.Biocarta.com). Gene set enrichment was calculated using parametric analysis of enrichment (Kim and Volsky, 2005) and significance assessed using a linear modeling approach. Following false discovery rate calculation, three of 254 pathways were deemed significantly enriched in human A2B5+ GPCs relative to their dissociate and not enriched in either GLT1+ astrocytes or CD11b+ microglial cells (5% FDR) (A). The most significant pathway at less than 1% FDR, SREBP control of lipid synthesis, was combined with additional manually annotated constituents. The expression values of each gene were summarized as a heatmap (B). Only data from the most variable probe set are shown following removal of non-informative probes. The genes were then assembled into a schematic pathway to illustrate the potential regulation of human GPCs by statin, and other inhibitors (C). Gene nodes in the pathway are colored according to expression in adult GPCs relative to the unsorted dissociate. Although the magnitude of gene expression of individual components was not extreme, the concerted over-expression of such a large number of enzymes in a single pathway indicates that this sterol synthesis pathway is likely highly active in adult GPCs.