Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:30:09.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2026

Sophie Walker*
Affiliation:
Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University , UK
Lucy J. Robinson
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Newcastle University , UK
R. Hamish McAllister-Williams
Affiliation:
Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University , UK Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust , UK
Stella-Maria Paddick
Affiliation:
Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University , UK Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust , UK Millennium Institute for Care Research (MiCares) , Chile
Lisbeth Mhando
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College , United Republic of Tanzania
Wilson Eliamini
Affiliation:
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College , United Republic of Tanzania
Linus Sakanda
Affiliation:
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College , United Republic of Tanzania
Richard Walker
Affiliation:
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust , UK Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University , UK
*
Corresponding author: Sophie Walker; Email: walkersophierose@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interventions for older adults with NCDs and depression should be relevant to the risk factors for NCDs in non-WEIRD populations. We conducted a single-group pilot study of the Ziba Ufa intervention, consisting of problem-solving therapy and health education over 6 weekly sessions delivered by lay counsellors; there was no control group. Participants were opportunistically sampled through outpatient NCD clinics in four sites in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. We conducted exploratory analyses of the clinical relevance of the health education using self-report survey data, and perceived relevance using qualitative interviews. Thirty-two participants enrolled (88% with hypertension and 44% with type 2 diabetes). Of the 21 participants with height and weight data, 12 (57%) were obese. Advice on weight loss, a sleep routine, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption may be clinically relevant, but alcohol and tobacco consumption, levels of physical activity and consumption of processed foods with added sugar or salt were self-reported as meeting recommendations; therefore, they may be less clinically relevant. Participants reported acting on the sleep advice more than on the dietary and physical activity advice. This may indicate that sleep advice was perceived as relevant, but dietary and physical activity advice was not.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the Ziba Ufa pilot studyTable 1. long description.

Figure 1

Table 2. Healthy lifestyle advice in the Ziba Ufa FlipchartTable 2. long description.

Figure 2

Figure 1. Lifestyle advice on diet, exercise and sleep.Figure 1. long description.

Figure 3

Table 3. WHOSTEPs baseline data on hypertension and type 2 diabetes disease history, management and lifestyle advice received (total sample N = 32)Table 3. long description.

Figure 4

Table 4. WHOSTEPs data on baseline modifiable risk factors for NCDs in the Ziba Ufa pilot study sample (N = 32)Table 4. long description.

Author comment: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R0/PR1

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Consider my comments to authors

This is a very interesting study that assessed the appropriateness of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with depression and chronic conditions in Tanzania. However, some major lapses and weaknesses need to be addressed for the manuscript to be publishable. Below are some concerns:

Title: [Appropriateness of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with depression and chronic conditions: findings from a pilot study in Tanzania]

1.Overly broad vs. actual scope: The title suggests a general assessment of “healthy lifestyle advice,” but the study is narrowly based on a small pilot (N=32) with limited generalizability.

2.Ambiguity in “appropriateness”: The term is conceptually loaded (implementation science) but not clearly operationalized in the title.

3.Missing design cue: “Pilot study” is included, but single-group, exploratory nature is not emphasized, may mislead readers about rigor.

Abstract

1.Inconsistent reporting: Reports “Sixteen participants (67%) were obese” — mathematically incorrect (16/32 = 50%).

2. Methods under-described: No mention of single-arm design, sampling strategy, or lack of control group.

3. Findings unclear: Blends baseline characteristics with intervention outcomes without distinction.

4. Overinterpretation: Claims about “relevance” and “adoption” are made despite weak measurement approaches.

5. No clear primary outcome: Desire to evaluate both appropriateness and adoption but lacks clarity on hierarchy.

Introduction

1.Weak problem framing: Jumps from global NCD burden to intervention need without clearly identifying a specific evidence gap.

2.Insufficient justification for study setting: Tanzania is not adequately contextualized (epidemiology, health system specifics).

3.Conceptual ambiguity: “Appropriateness” and “adoption” are introduced (via implementation science frameworks) but not operationally linked to study design.

4.Literature gap not sharply defined: Cites cultural adaptation literature but does not clearly show why this intervention or method is novel.

5.Research questions weakly aligned: Question 1 (relevance) is descriptive; Question 2 (methodological) is exploratory, no cohesive hypothesis.

Methods

1.Design limitations: Single-group pilot with no comparator, yet attempts to infer “appropriateness” and “adoption.”

2.Sampling bias: Opportunistic sampling in clinics → selection bias toward care-engaged individuals.

3.Measurement flaws: “Relevance” defined using an arbitrary >50% threshold with no theoretical or empirical justification.

4.Outcome validity concerns: “Count analysis” of qualitative data lacks methodological rigor; not a validated approach.

5.Data quality issues: High missingness (up to 36%) not addressed analytically.

6.Instrumentation concerns: Translation issues acknowledged but not mitigated (e.g., physical activity categories unclear).

7.Intervention description insufficient: Lacks detail on fidelity, adherence, and standardization across sites.

8.No power or sample size rationale.

9.Ethics not described.

Results

1.Descriptive, not analytical: No inferential statistics or meaningful comparisons.

2.Internal inconsistencies: Conflicting self-reported activity data not resolved.

3.Over-reliance on self-report: No objective measures (except partial BMI).

4.Poor structure: Results merged with discussion, reduces clarity.

5.Missing data impact ignored: No sensitivity analysis or handling strategy.

6.Tables not interpretable: Referenced tables lack clarity (poorly formatted).

Discussion

1.Overinterpretation of weak data: Claims about “relevance” and “appropriateness” based on arbitrary thresholds and small sample.

2.Speculative reasoning: Poverty, culture, and environment invoked without direct evidence from data.

3.Methodological defense instead of critique: Attempts to justify “count analysis” despite clear limitations.

4.Lack of theoretical integration: Minimal engagement with implementation frameworks beyond superficial citation.

5.Causality implied without basis: Suggests intervention effects without control or pre-post comparison.

Limitations

1.Incomplete: Fails to acknowledge key issues:

Arbitrary definition of “relevance”

Lack of validated adoption measures

Interviewer and translation bias

Lack of intervention fidelity assessment

2.Understated severity: Limitations described but not fully connected to threats to validity.

Conclusion

1.Overgeneralized claims: Suggests broader applicability despite pilot-scale evidence.

2.Repetition rather than synthesis: Restates findings without deeper insight.

3.Not aligned with evidence strength: Conclusions exceed what the data can support.

References

1.Generally relevant but: Some incomplete or poorly formatted entries.

2.Limited use of recent Africa-specific intervention studies.

3.Over-reliance on older or high-income country literature for behavioral interventions.

Tables

1.Major presentation issues: Tables are referenced but poorly formatted in manuscript.

2.Lack of clarity: No clear denominators, inconsistent labeling.

3.Redundancy: Some tables duplicate narrative text without adding value.

Figures

1.Figure 1 concerns: “Count icons” approach is non-standard and potentially misleading. No statistical underpinning or validation.

2.Interpretability issues: Visuals may oversimplify qualitative data.

3.Not reproducible: Method for generating figure not clearly described.

Review: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

This is a good paper that choose to have an implemention among the older person in SSA. I had an issue with inclusion and exclusion criteria which was not clear in the write-up. A few issues noted have been highlighted in the discussion. This has got to do with the bias in self reporting, lack of inclusion of support persons or care givers who could report if the intervention was taken up or not. The point in the use of biomarkers could have more beneficial in the study and also to the partcipants such that they could see the benefits of the intervention. Validation in the translation could have been done forehand so that it does not come up as a limitation. Future studies should be large enough so that they can be representative of the population, making replicability easier.

Review: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The authors have presented good findings from this research work which really contributes to knowledge. I have the following comments to further improve the write-up:

1. On what premise was the 50% cutoff chosen? It is suggested that the authors justify the 50% cutoff with a reference to literature, or use an approach such as comparison to regional prevalence

2. Why are the tables presented in the write-up listed again after reference listing? Is this a requirement from Cambridge Prism for Global Mental Health as an appendix? If no, it is suggested that the authors delete the table listing found after the reference list and include the figure on the last page in the body of the write-up

3. The authors have presented the Results and Discussion as one single section the write-up. it is suggested that the separate the Results and Discussion into two main sections. It is suggested that the authors move all citation and comparisons to discussion of findings section while keeping the results section purely descriptive.

Recommendation: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R1/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R1/PR8

Conflict of interest statement

There are no competing interests to this review

Comments

The author has addressed most the concerns raised by the reviewers. The reviewers were thourough. One part that the author was unable to address effectively, was the issue with the limited usage of African Studies references plus the over reliance of outdated western studies. I do understand that in the Global South, there is paucity of older adults studies hence the use of more western studies. This pilot study is instrumental in increasing the pool of knowledge in this area.

Recommendation: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Relevance of healthy lifestyle advice for older adults with chronic conditions and depression: Exploratory analyses from a single-group pilot study in Tanzania — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.