Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:29:31.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of Ordovician chitinozoan Lagenochitina esthonica sensu lato: morphometrics, biostratigraphy and paleobiogeography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2021

Yan LiangOpen the ORCID record for Yan Liang[Opens in a new window],
Jaak Nõlvak,
Honghe Xu,
Yansen Chen and
Olle Hints
Yan Liang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China , ,
Jaak Nõlvak
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 19086, Estonia ,
Honghe Xu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China , ,
Yansen Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China , ,
Olle Hints
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 19086, Estonia ,
*
*Corresponding author
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lagenochitina esthonica is a globally distributed chitinozoan in Early to Middle Ordovician rocks. It is regarded as an index species for the early Floian in North America and has a stratigraphically constrained range in other regions. Lagenochitina esthonica is distinguished from other chitinozoans by a distinct flexure, a nearly rounded-square chamber, and a cylindrical neck with a flaring collar. However, since the first description of the species in the 1950s, it has included two varieties: a relatively short form with a test length ~400 μm, and a slender form usually longer than 600 μm. In order to revise the taxonomy of the L. esthonica group, we carried out a statistical morphometric study of a large collection of well-preserved specimens from the Baltic region where the taxon was first established. Additionally, the stratigraphic and geographic distribution of both forms was analyzed based on available occurrence data. The results show that the short form occurs in the upper Tremadocian to lower Dapingian, whereas the slender form is mostly reported from the lower and middle Darriwilian. Both forms are identified on Baltica; the short form has also been reported from Laurentia and South China, whereas the other is known also from Avalonia and Gondwana. The morphological distinction, together with differences in stratigraphic and spatial ranges, suggest that the two forms represent separate species: the original stout L. esthonica, based on the morphology of the holotype, and the slender L. megaesthonica n. sp., described herein. The updated taxonomy enhances the stratigraphic and biogeographic usefulness of lagenochitinids globally.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/ec49166e-2a8d-4941-8723-f023853c5a7e.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , January 2022, pp. 46 - 60
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Introduction

Chitinozoans are organic-walled microfossils common in Ordovician to Devonian marine sediments. In spite of their disputed biological origin (see Liang et al., Reference Liang, Hints, Tang, Cai, Goldman, Nõlvak, Tihelka, Pang, Bernardo and Wang2020a and references therein), chitinozoans are widely used in biostratigraphy of early and middle Paleozoic rocks (e.g., Grahn and Gutiérrez, Reference Grahn and Gutiérrez2001; Asselin et al., Reference Asselin, Achab and Soufiane2004; Vandenbroucke, Reference Vandenbroucke2004; Grahn, Reference Grahn2005a; Steemans et al., Reference Steemans, Le Hérissé, Melvin, Miller, Paris, Verniers and Wellman2009; Vandenbroucke et al., Reference Vandenbroucke, Armstrong, Williams, Paris, Zalasiewicz, Sabbe, Nõlvak, Challands, Verniers and Servais2010, Reference Vandenbroucke, Emsbo, Munnecke, Nuns, Duponchel, Lepot, Quijada, Paris, Servais and Kiessling2015; de la Puente and Rubinstein, Reference de la Puente and Rubinstein2013; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Feng, Vandenbroucke, Li and Verniers2013; Paris et al., Reference Paris, Miller and Zalasiewicz2015a, Reference Paris, Verniers, Miller, Melvin and Wellmanb; Al-Shawareb et al., Reference Al-Shawareb, Miller and Vecoli2017; De Weirdt et al., Reference De Weirdt, Vandenbroucke, Cocq, Russell, Davies, Melchin and Zalasiewicz2019; Liang et al., Reference Liang, Wang, Servais, Wu, Nõlvak, Hints, Wei, Gong and Yan2020b) since the regional and global biozonal schemes were first established around the 1990s (Achab, Reference Achab1989; Paris, Reference Paris1990; Nõlvak and Grahn, Reference Nõlvak and Grahn1993; Verniers et al., Reference Verniers, Nestor, Paris, Dufka, Sutherland and Van Grootel1995; Paris et al., Reference Paris, Achab, Asselin, Chen, Grahn, Nõlvak, Obut, Samuelsson, Sennikov, Vecoli, Webby, Droser, Paris and Percival2004; Grahn, Reference Grahn2005b, Reference Grahn2006). However, alongside revised genus- and family-level systematics (Paris et al., Reference Paris, Grahn, Nestor and Lakova1999), and continuously expanding datasets from different regions in recent years, revisions of several well-known taxa are required. Sporadic discussions on index chitinozoans have been published in recent years, improving the usefulness of these taxa in biostratigraphy (Butcher, Reference Butcher2013; Nowak et al., Reference Nowak, Servais, Pittet, Vaucher, Akodad, Gaines and Vandenbroucke2016; Liang et al., Reference Liang, Servais, Tang, Liu and Wang2017, Reference Liang, Hints, Servais, Luan, Nõlvak, Tang and Wu2019; de la Puente et al., Reference de la Puente, Paris and Vaccari2020), but more work is required to further improve the chitinozoan biozonal schemes in general.

A common and distinctive key species, Lagenochitina esthonica, was first described by Eisenack (Reference Eisenack1955) from the Baltic Region and has since then been identified from Early and Middle Ordovician rocks from Baltica (Estonia, Sweden), Laurentia (Canada), Gondwana (western Australia, Bohemia), Avalonia (UK), and South China (full details listed in Supplemental Data 1). The diagnostic characters of Lagenochitina esthonica include a cylindric neck ended with a remarkable flaring collar and a distinct flexure that connects the neck with a rounded quadrate chamber. Lagenochitina esthonica is one of the largest representatives of the genus, with an average length of ~500 μm based on 18 specimens from the type locality (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1955). Due to the distinctive morphology and wide distribution, L. esthonica has become one of the most characteristic species for the Early and Middle Ordovician period. In North America, it was put forward as the index taxon for the lower Floian (Achab, Reference Achab1989), together with Conochitina raymondii Achab, Reference Achab1980, just above the globally recognized Euconochitina symmetrica Biozone.

However, two different varieties carrying the diagnostic characters of Lagenochitina esthonica can be detected in previously published literature. One corresponds to the holotype shown in Eisenack (Reference Eisenack1955); the other developed an even larger vesicle with a much more slender outline (e.g., Jenkins, Reference Jenkins1967, pl. 74, figs. 4, 5; Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1968, pl. 25, fig. 25).

The morphology and taxonomy of the two forms have been discussed by previous authors. Eisenack (Reference Eisenack1968) pointed out that the short and slender forms co-occurred in the same population in the glauconite limestone in Estonia (mostly Dapingian in age), while in the “vaginatum limestone” and “Expansus limestone” in Sweden (Darriwilian), only elongated forms were recovered. Bockelie (Reference Bockelie1980) indicated that the species changed from a mixture of short and long forms in the lower Arenig to predominantly long forms in the lowermost Llanvirn. Paris (Reference Paris1981) denoted that the two forms are certainly related, but of different stratigraphic distributions, and suggested that a revision based on the material from the type area in Baltica may allow separating them. Paris and Mergl (Reference Paris and Mergl1984) put forward a dividing standard that restricted typical L. esthonica to specimens carrying the conspicuous shoulders and flexure, as in the holotype, with a ratio of vesicle length to maximum diameter ≤4. The L. esthonica reported by Grahn (Reference Grahn1980) with an inconspicuous flexure was attributed to a later-established taxon, Lagenochitina yilingensis Chen et al., Reference Chen, Paris, Wang and Zhang2009a.

The present study aims to analyze the morphology and distribution of Lagenochitina esthonica sensu lato in order to evaluate the similarities and differences between the short and long forms and revise the taxon accordingly. For this, we use well-preserved material from the eastern Baltic region, stratigraphically ranging from the upper Tremadocian to mid Darriwilian. The morphometrical analysis is complemented with biostratigraphical and paleobiogeographical assessment of range overlaps of the two forms of L. esthonica in time and space.

Geological setting

Locality information

The materials studied in this paper are recovered from four localities: the Jägala waterfall outcrop and Kaldase drill core from northern Estonia; Kaugatuma drill core from Saaremaa Island, western Estonia; and Baldone drill core from Latvia (Fig. 1). These sections represent the eastern part of the Baltoscandian Basin that covered large areas of Baltica during the Ordovician (Männil, Reference Männil1966; Cocks and Torsvik, Reference Cocks and Torsvik2005). In this region, the Lower to lower Middle Ordovician interval is characterized by transition from siliciclastic to cool-water carbonate ramp settings (Nestor and Einasto, Reference Nestor, Einasto, Raukas and Teedum1997; Dronov and Rozhnov, Reference Dronov and Rozhnov2007).

Figure 1.

Paleogeographic settings of the study area. The four red marks show the localities of the four at Jägala, Kaldase, Kaugatuma, and Baldone on Baltica.

Stratigraphic and geological time information

The Jägala waterfall section exposes strata from the upper Türisalu to the Loobu formations, ranging from the Pakerort to Kunda regional stages, corresponding to the Tremadocian to lower Darriwilian (Fig. 2.1).

Figure 2.

Lithology and biostratigraphical distribution of Lagenochitina esthonica at Jägala, Kaldase, Kaugatuma, and Baldone sections. Red and black range-through occurrence data represent short and slender forms of L. esthonica, respectively. Bill. = Billingen; Glo. = Global; Hunn. = Hunneberg; Reg. = Regional; Pa = Pakerort; Ka = Kallavere. The samples labeled with the beginning “OM” are used to distinguish those samples from those labeled with the beginning “M.” OM refers to the microfossil samples re-collected by Olle Hints and his colleagues in 2018. Other samples were collected in 1969–2014 by other paleontologists.

In the Kaldase section, strata from the lowermost Volkhov to Aseri regional stages (Fig. 2.2), corresponding to the Dapingian to middle Darriwilian, were continuously sampled for microfossil study.

In the Kaugatuma section, chitinozoan samples were collected from the upper part of the Volkhov to Lasnamägi regional stages, corresponding to the upper Dapingian to the upper Darriwilian (Fig. 2.3). The lowermost part of the Volkhov Regional Stage is characterized by reddish limestone and argillaceous limestone, which are always barren of chitinozoans.

In the Baldone section, the studied interval ranges from the Pakerort to Aseri regional stages, corresponding to the Tremadocian to lower Darriwilian (Fig. 2.4). The lower part of the section, ranging through the entire Volknov Regional Stage, is characterized by reddish sediments that are barren of organic-walled microfossils.

Materials and methods

The four sections were studied for organic-walled microfossils using ~150–300 g samples and acid extraction or disintegration techniques, following the methods described in detail by Paris (Reference Paris1981). Microfossils were hand-picked from the residues and stored in glycerin. Chitinozoans from the Jägala section recently have been reported by Nõlvak et al. (Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019). Chitinozoan data from the other three sections have not been published previously, but the results have been used to gain general understanding of chitinozoan distribution and diversity patterns on Baltica (e.g., Nõlvak in Paris et al., Reference Paris, Achab, Asselin, Chen, Grahn, Nõlvak, Obut, Samuelsson, Sennikov, Vecoli, Webby, Droser, Paris and Percival2004).

In order to obtain material for morphometric analysis, a total of 155 existing micropaleontological preparations from the four sections were studied, 35 of which contained Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. (Fig. 2). In total, 506 well-preserved specimens were selected for imaging, measuring, and statistical analysis. All specimens were imaged using a Leica M205A stereo microscope equipped with Leica camera system. The measurements were taken from digital images using Leica Application Suite (LAS) software. The systematic framework and terminology follow Paris et al. (Reference Paris, Grahn, Nestor and Lakova1999), and the following measurements were used: vesicle length (L), chamber diameter after correction (Dp*), and the length/width ratio (L/Dp*). The correction factor of the compressed test follows Paris et al. (Reference Paris, Miller and Zalasiewicz2015a), which is a coefficient of 0.8 for the chamber. Of the 506 specimens measured, 460 provided reliable vesicle length data and 483 reliable chamber diameter data. The results were statistically analyzed using R software (R Core Team, 2016). Material selected for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was cleaned in distilled water and mounted on stubs using thin, water-soluble gelatin film. A Zeiss EVO MA15 SEM at TalTech was used.

Paleogeographical distribution maps were generated using the ArcGIS 10 environment. Geographic coordinates of previously reported Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. occurrences were estimated using Google Earth, and then transferred to paleo-GPS using PointTracker v7.0 (PaleoGIS, http://www.Paleogis.com). The paleomaps adopted in this study are from Scotese (Reference Scotese2016).

Repository and institutional abbreviation

Types, figured, and all the other specimens examined and studied in this paper are stored at the Department of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology (GIT), Tallinn, Estonia.

Results

Morphology and size variation

Results of morphometric analysis of 506 specimens of Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. are summarized on Figure 3. The original data of all the measurements are presented in the Supplementary Data 2. When all data are considered, the test length ranges from 268–1288 μm, with mean and median values of 675 μm and 695 μm, respectively (25th and 75th percentiles ~498 μm and 817 μm, respectively; standard error 9.5). Chamber diameter ranges from 121–372 μm, with mean and median values of 219 μm and 217 μm, respectively (25th and 75th percentiles ~191 μm and 246 μm, respectively; standard error 1.84). The ratio of L/Dp* ranges from 1.46–6.60, with mean and median values of 3.10 and 3.09, respectively (25th and 75th percentiles ~2.46 and 3.57, respectively; standard error 0.04).

The statistical analysis shows that the three histograms of test length depicting the entire data set (Fig. 3.1), and separately the data from the Jägala (Fig. 3.4) and Kaldase sections (Fig. 3.7), are far from normal distributions. Two significant acmes can be recognized in Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.4. Values are clustered around 400 μm and a weak acme can be recognized at the interval of 800–900 μm in the Kaldase section (Fig. 3.7). The histograms of Dp* match a normal distribution when all the data are included (Fig. 3.2), while the distributions for each section individually are less perfect. Histograms of L/Dp* show a long tail at the left side, especially at the Kaldase section (Fig. 3.9).

Figure 3.

Histograms and box-plots of the test length (L), chamber diameter after correction (Dp*), and the ratio of L/Dp*. (1–3) Based on all the valid data from the studied sections; (4–6) based on the data from the Jägala waterfall outcrop, Estonia; (7–9) based on the data from Kaldase borehole, Estonia; (10–12) based on the data from Kaugatuma borehole, Estonia; (13–15) based on data from Baldone borehole, Lativa.

In the Jägala section, Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. ranges almost through the entire section, starting from the Hunneberg Regional Stage, upper Tremadocian–Floian, and extending to the Kunda Regional Stage, lower and middle Darriwilian (Fig. 2.1). In the lower part of its range, L. esthonica s.l. is distinguished by a stout outline with a rounded square chamber (Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019, fig. 6G), whereas in the upper part, starting from the upper part of the Volkhov Regional Stage, a slender form with an elongated ovoid chamber occurs (Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019, fig. 6L, M). The vesicle length measured in the lower part ranges from 323–536 μm, with a mean value of 428 μm based on 17 specimens from samples M-14576 and M-2569. The length measured in the upper part of the section ranges from 451–1288 μm, with a mean value of 803 μm based on 42 specimens from samples M-2576 to M-4164.

In the Kaldase section, Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. appeared in the Volkhov and Kunda regional stages (Fig. 2.2). The histogram of test length shows that most data are grouped around 400 μm, but a low acme appeared near 800–900 μm (Fig. 3.7). The length of L. esthonica s.l. in the Volkhov Regional Stage ranges from 268–647 μm, with a mean value of 403 μm based on 102 specimens. Tests recovered in this interval are characterized by a rounded square chamber and a relatively short neck, which takes about one-quarter to one-third of the total length (Fig. 4.1–4.22). Specimens from the Kunda Regional Stage range from 477–1181 μm, with a mean value of 815 μm based on 18 measurements. These stratigraphically younger specimens are distinguished by a slender outline with an elongated ovoid chamber and a neck, which takes about one-third to one-half of the total length (Fig. 4.23–4.32).

Figure. 4.

Lagenochitina esthonica emend. (1–22) and Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (23–32) from the Kaldase section, northern Estonia. Each black scale bar on the left boundary of the figure represents 100 μm; the total length of the white background line is 2582 μm. Sample M-13596: (1, 6, 9–11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20–22); Sample M-13597: (2–5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 16, 19); Sample M-13622: (24, 26, 32); Sample M-13627: (25, 27, 31); Sample M-13628: (23, 28–30).

In the Kaugatuma section, Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. occurs in the Kunda Regional Stage, from samples M-13446 to M-13459 (Fig. 2, Kaugatuma drill core, Estonia). Test length ranges from 441–963 μm, with a mean value of 689 μm based on 71 specimens. Histograms of test length, diameter of chamber, and L/Dp* show one peak (Fig. 3.10–3.12). The specimens are all preserved in full relief. Their necks may be very short (e.g., Fig. 5.5, 5.12, 5.21), about one-fifth to one-quarter of the test length. But the necks also can be very long (e.g., Fig. 5.13, 5.16, 5.18), corresponding to about two-fifths to one-half of vesicle length. The outline of the specimens is relatively slender, with an elongated chamber (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (1–31) from the Kaugatuma section, western Estonia. Each black scale bar on the left boundary of the figure represents 100 μm; the total length of the white background line is 3312 μm. All specimens are from Sample M-13458. (23) holotype, with a repository number of GIT 833-1. (15) paratype, with a repository number of GIT 833-2.

In the Baldone section, Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. has been identified only in the Kunda Regional Stage, from samples M-13670 to M-13682 (Fig. 2, Baldone drill core, central Latvia). The histogram of test length shows a normal distribution. The length ranges from 442–1097 μm, with a mean value of 786 μm, based on 210 specimens (Fig. 3.13). Some of the compressed chambers are reminiscent of a rounded square (e.g., Fig. 6.9, 6.21–6.26). When compression is taken into consideration, the real chamber should have been less square and more elongated.

Figure 6.

Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (1–26) from the Baldone section, central Latvia. Each black scale bar on the left boundary of the figure represents 100 μm; the total length of the white background line is 3584 μm. Sample M-13670: (10–12, 16, 17, 22); M-13671: (9, 23); M-13672: (26); M-13674: (1, 2, 6, 15, 24, 25); M-13676: (3–5, 7, 8, 14, 18, 19); M-13679: (20, 21); M-13682: (13). (23, 26) paratypes, with repository number of GIT 833-3 and GIT 833-4, respectively.

Discussion

Morphology and size variation

According to the statistical results presented above, two distinct groups can be recognized within the specimens previously assigned to Lagenochitina esthonica. Morphologically, both groups carry the diagnostic features of L. esthonica—large bottle-shaped chitinozoans possessing a well-differentiated neck ending with a conspicuous flaring collar and a distinct flexure with nearly parallel flanks. The main difference between the two groups is that one has a rounded square chamber, matching the morphology of the holotype of L. esthonica, whereas the other is much slenderer, with an elongated ovoid chamber, and a relatively longer neck.

Statistically, test length of the stout group ranges from 268–647 μm, with mean and median values of 406 μm and 398 μm, respectively (25th and 75th percentile around 357 μm and 451 μm, respectively; standard error 4.3), based on 120 specimens from the lower part of the Jägala and Kaldase sections (Fig. 7.1). Vesicle length of the slender form ranges from 441–1288 μm, with mean and median values of 769 μm and 758 μm, respectively (25th and 75th percentile around 675 μm and 868 μm, respectively; standard error 7.60), based on 341 measurements from four sections (Fig. 7.4). Generally, the length of the slender form is about twice that of the short group. The corrected diameter of the chamber of the short form ranges from 130–260 μm, about three-quarters of them range from 160–220 μm (Fig. 7.2) and the slender form ranges from 121–372 μm, nearly three-fifths range from 200–260 μm (Fig. 7.5). The L/Dp* of the slender forms is commonly ~2.5–4 (Fig. 7.6), whereas for the short form it is a~1.8–2.4 (Fig. 7.3). These data allow us to conclude that the two forms represent morphologically distinct assemblages with limited overlap in size and shape.

Figure 7.

Histograms and box-plots of the test length (L), chamber diameter after correction (Dp*), and the ratio of L/Dp* of emended Lagenochitina esthonica (1–3), short forms and Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (4–6), slender forms.

Stratigraphic distribution

Within the four studied sections, the short form of Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. occurs in the Hunneberg to lower Volkhov regional stages at the Jägala outcrop and in the lower and middle parts of the Volkhov Regional Stage in the Kaldase drill core, which corresponds to the upper Tremadocian to lower Dapingian interval (Fig. 2.1, 2.2). The slender form appears in the uppermost Volkhov to Kunda regional stages at the Jägala section, and in the Kunda Regional Stage at the Kaldase, Kaugatuma, and Baldone sections, corresponding to the uppermost Dapingian to the middle part of the Darriwilian (Fig. 2). Thus, based on the distribution of L. esthonica s.l. in the studied sections, the stratigraphic ranges of the two groups are largely separated. Possibly, the younger, long form represents a descendant lineage of the older, shorter form.

Biogeographic distribution

The paleobiogeographic distribution of Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. is wide (see Supplementary Data 1). Considering previously published data, the short form, including the holotype of L. esthonica in Eisenack (Reference Eisenack1955), has been reported in pre-Darriwilian strata in Estonia (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1955; Grahn, Reference Grahn1984; Hints and Nõlvak, Reference Hints and Nõlvak2006; Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019), Russia (Obut, Reference Obut and Zhuravleva1973), Norway (Bockelie, Reference Bockelie1978, Reference Bockelie1980), Canada (Achab, Reference Achab1980, Reference Achab1986), Bohemia (Paris and Mergl, Reference Paris and Mergl1984), and China (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Paris, Wang and Zhang2009a, Reference Chen, Zhang and Wangb; Liang, Reference Liang2015; Liang et al., Reference Liang, Servais, Tang, Liu and Wang2017, Reference Liang, Hints, Luan, Tang, Nõlvak and Zhan2018). Most of these occurrences are confined to Early Ordovician. The slender form of L. esthonica s.l., represented by the specimens from the Hope Shale in the UK (Jenkins, Reference Jenkins1967), corresponding to mid Darriwilian, and has been reported in Darriwilian strata in Sweden (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1955, Reference Eisenack1968, Reference Eisenack1976a; Grahn, Reference Grahn1980; Grahn et al., Reference Grahn, Nõlvak and Paris1996), Estonia (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1976b; Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019), and France (Paris, Reference Paris1981). Paleogeographically, the short form is distributed in Baltica, Laurentia, and South China, and the slender form occurs in Baltica, Gondwana, and Avalonia (Fig. 8). Consequently, there also seems to be biogeographic differentiation between the two forms, with only Baltica having both of them represented.

Figure 8.

Paleogeographic distributions of emended Lagenochitina esthonica and Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. in the interval of Floian–Dapingian (1) and Darriwilian (2). Detailed information of the occurrence data marked by numbers is presented in Supplemental Data 1. The paleomaps are according to Scotese (Reference Scotese2016).

Conclusions

The above-presented results show that two groups within Lagenochitina esthonica s.l. can be well differentiated by both morphology and stratigraphic ranges. Statistically, two acmes can be recognized in the histograms of vesicle length, one ~400 μm and the other in the interval of 700–800 μm. Morphologically, the short form is distinguished by a rounded square chamber with the L/Dp* ratio ~1.4–2.9, whereas the slender form is featured by an elongated ovoid chamber with the L/Dp* ratio ~2.0–6.6. Stratigraphically, the short form appears in the upper Tremadocian to lower Dapingian, whereas the slender form occurs mainly in the lower and middle Darriwilian. Biogeographically, the two forms co-occurred only in Baltica, further stressing the separation of the two groups. In summary, we interpret these data as indicating the presence of two rather than one species. The type specimen of L. esthonica (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1955) represents the short form, and based on that, the original species diagnosis and description are emended to include specimens carrying a rounded square chamber with a medium to large vesicle and occurring in pre-Darriwilian strata. Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. is erected for the slender form, referring to specimens with an elongated ovoid chamber with a large to huge test, mainly restricted to the lower and middle parts of the Darriwilian. Separation of these two species provides an additional biostratigraphic marker for Baltoscandia and beyond, contributing also to an improved understanding of the biogeographic distribution of Early and early Middle Ordovician chitinozoans.

Systematic paleontology

Order Prosomatifera Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1972
Family Conochitinidae Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1931, emend. Paris, Reference Paris1981
Subfamily Lagenochitinnae Paris, Reference Paris1981
Genus Lagenochitina Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1931, emend. Paris et al., Reference Paris, Grahn, Nestor and Lakova1999

Type species

Lagenochitina baltica Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1931. The holotype was recovered from the “Ostseekalk” Ordovician erratic limestone from the Baltic shore (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1931, p. 80–81, pl. 1, fig. 1). Because the holotype is lost, it was replaced by a neotype, also deriving from the “Ostseekalk” (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1959, p. 2, pl. 3, fig. 6).

Lagenochitina esthonica Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1955, emend. Liang, Nõlvak, and Hints
Figure 4.1–4.22
Reference Eisenack1955

Lagenochitina esthonica Eisenack, p. 311, pl. 1, figs. 8, 9.

non Reference Jenkins1967

Lagenochitina esthonica; Jenkins, p. 463, pl. 74, figs. 4, 5.

p Reference Eisenack1968

Lagenochitina esthonica; Eisenack, p. 156, pl. 24, fig. 10, pl. 29, fig. 25?, text-fig. 1.

Reference Downie, Lister, Harris and Fettes1971

Lagenochitina esthonica; Downie et al., p. 21, pl. 1, fig. 17.

non ?Reference Eisenack1972

Lagenochitina esthonica; Combaz and Peniguel, p. 145, pl. 4, figs. 1, 2, text-fig. 2.

Reference Obut and Zhuravleva1973

Lagenochitina esthonica; Obut, pl. 10, figs. 6–8.

non Reference Eisenack1976a

Lagenochitina esthonica; Eisenack, p. 186, pl. 2, fig. 1; text-fig. 2.

p Reference Eisenack1976b

Lagenochitina esthonica; Eisenack, fig. 6.

Reference Bockelie1978

Lagenochitina esthonica; Bockelie, fig. 2C, D.

Reference Bockelie1980

Lagenochitina esthonica; Bockelie, p. 12, pl. 2, figs 1–7, text-figs. 7C, 8.

non Reference Grahn1980

Lagenochitina esthonica; Grahn, p. 3, fig. 19 A–D.

Reference Achab1980

Lagenochitina esthonica; Achab, p. 234, pl. 3, figs. 1–6.

non Reference Paris1981

Lagenochitina esthonica; Paris, p. 248, pl. 10, figs. 15, 20.

Reference Grahn1984

Lagenochitina esthonica; Grahn, p. 22, pl. 4, figs. F, G.

Reference Paris and Mergl1984

Lagenochitina esthonica; Paris and Mergl, p. 55, pl. 4, figs. 2–6.

? Reference Geng1984

Lagenochitina cf. esthonica; Geng, p. 513, pl. 1, fig. 6.

non Reference Zhen1985

Lagenochitina esthonica; Zhen, p. 378, pl. 1, figs. 17–19.

non Reference Gao1986

Lagenochitina esthonica; Gao, p. 145, pl. 3, figs 3–6, 10–15, pl. 4, figs. 1–3, 7.

Reference Achab1986

Lagenochitina esthonica; Achab, p. 693, pl. 2, figs 16–18, pl. 4, figs. 1–3.

non Reference Grahn, Nõlvak and Paris1996

Lagenochitina esthonica; Grahn et al., pl. 3, fig. 9.

non Reference Olaru and Apostoae2004

Lagenochitina esthonica; Olaru and Apostoae, p. 302, pl. 1, figs. 1–14.

non Reference Olaru2005

Lagenochitina esthonica; Olaru, pl. 3, figs. 1–14.

non Reference Chen and Zhang2005

Lagenochitina esthonica; Chen and Zhang, p. 50, pl. 1, figs. 2, 10, 17, 18, 20, 22.

non Reference Hints and Nõlvak2006

Lagenochitina esthonica; Hints and Nõlvak, pl. 4, fig. 27.

?Reference Grahn and Nõlvak2007

Lagenochitina esthonica; Grahn and Nõlvak, fig. 4C.

Reference Chen, Paris, Wang and Zhang2009a

Lagenochitina esthonica; Chen et al., p. 324, pl. 4, figs. 4, 8, 11?.

Reference Chen, Zhang and Wang2009b

Lagenochitina esthonica; Chen et al., p. 159, pl. 2, fig. 7?, pl. 29, figs. 4, 8.

non Reference Olaru, Grasu and Chihaia2011

Lagenochitina esthonica; Olaru et al., pl. 1, figs. 3, 5, 10, 18, 19, 21.

Reference Wang, Feng, Vandenbroucke, Li and Verniers2013

Lagenochitina esthonica; Wang et al., p. 56, pl. 3, figs. 1–3.

Reference Liang2015

Lagenochitina esthonica typical Liang, p. 142, pl. 1, figs. 1–9.

non Reference Nowak, Servais, Pittet, Vaucher, Akodad, Gaines and Vandenbroucke2016

Lagenochitina esthonica; Nowak et al., fig. 7Q.

Reference Liang, Servais, Tang, Liu and Wang2017

Lagenochitina esthonica; Liang et al., pl. 1, figs. 1–5.

Reference Liang, Hints, Luan, Tang, Nõlvak and Zhan2018

Lagenochitina esthonica; Liang et al., fig. 3X.

Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019

Lagenochitina esthonica; Nõlvak et al., fig. 6G.

Holotype

Specimen from the lower part of the glauconitic limestone (=Toila Formation), stage B2α (=Volkhov Regional Stage), corresponding to the global Dapingian Stage, at Paldiski, Pakri Peninsula, NW Estonia (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1955, pl. 1, fig. 8). According to Paris (Reference Paris1981, p. 249), the test dimensions are L-Dp-Dc-Lp: 530-194-94-350 μm.

Diagnosis

Medium to large Lagenochitina with a short cylindrical neck ended with an extraordinary flaring collar. Chamber quadrate ovoid to rounded square, usually with distinct shoulders. The test length is ~1.5–2.9 times the chamber diameter.

Occurrence

If the synonymy list of the present study is adopted, the valid Lagenochitina esthonica occurrences are mainly from Baltica, Laurentia, and South China (Fig. 8), including the lower glauconitic limestone (Toila Formation, Dapingian) (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1955, Reference Eisenack1968, Reference Eisenack1976b), the Vääna limestone (Dapingian) (Grahn, Reference Grahn1984), and the Leetse Formation (Floian) (Hints and Nõlvak, Reference Hints and Nõlvak2006; Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019) in Estonia; Arenig strata (Floian) of the Pestovo borehole, Moscow Basin in central Baltica (Obut, Reference Obut and Zhuravleva1973); the Valhallfonna Formation (Floian) in Spitsbergen, Norway (Bockelie, Reference Bockelie1978, Reference Bockelie1980); the lower part of the Lévis Formation (Floian) in Quebec (Achab, Reference Achab1980, Reference Achab1986); the Klabava Formation (Floian–Dapingian) in the Prague Basin, Bohemia (Paris and Mergl, Reference Paris and Mergl1984); the Hunghuayuan, lower part of the Dawan, Ningkuo, and Tungtzu formation (upper Tremadocian–Floian) in South China (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Paris, Wang and Zhang2009a, Reference Chen, Zhang and Wangb; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Feng, Vandenbroucke, Li and Verniers2013; Liang, Reference Liang2015; Liang et al., Reference Liang, Servais, Tang, Liu and Wang2017, Reference Liang, Hints, Luan, Tang, Nõlvak and Zhan2018). In the present study, Lagenochitina esthonica occurs in the Hunneberg to lower Volkhov stages at the Jägala section, and in the lower and middle parts of the Volkhov Regional Stage in the Kaldase core, corresponding to the upper Tremadocian to lower Dapingian, Early to early Middle Ordovician.

Description

Test medium to large, ranging from 268–647 μm (average 406 μm) in length. Neck clearly differentiated and cylindrical, taking ~15–40% of the test length, ended with an extraordinary flaring collar (e.g., Fig. 4.7, 4.8). Chamber quadrate ovoid to rounded square, usually with distinct shoulders. The maximum diameter is located at the middle part of the chamber, which is 1/3 to 2/3 times the test length after correction. Flexure distinct, flanks nearly parallel to slightly swollen, base flat or slightly convex, base margin rounded. Mucron usually present, but with various shapes and size: it can be short and narrow (e.g., Fig. 4.8, 4.13) or short and wide (e.g., Fig. 4.11, 4.22); sometimes it is prolonged and became narrow in the aboral side (e.g., Fig. 4.5, 4.21); sometimes the test lacks a mucron, which is replaced by a rounded scar (e.g., Fig. 4.20). Test surface can be smooth, but consists of minute granules (e.g., Fig. 4.11, 4.15); it can also have a rugose to spongy surface (e.g., Fig. 4.17, 4.21).

Materials

Seventeen specimens were recovered from samples M-14576 and M-2569 from the Jägala waterfall section (Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019), and 103 specimens from samples M-13595 to M-13600 from the Kaldase drill core, Estonia (Fig. 2).

Dimension

Dimensions (Table 1) are based on 120 specimens, 12 of which are compressed and others are preserved three-dimensionally.

Table 1.

Dimensions of Lagenochitina esthonica emend. L = test length, Ldp = chamber length, Dp = chamber diameter, Dp* = corrected chamber diameter, Dn = neck diameter, Dn* = corrected neck diameter, Dc = collar diameter, Dc* = corrected collar diameter, L/Dp* = the ratio of the test length to corrected chamber diameter, Dp*/Dn* = corrected chamber diameter to neck diameter, and Ln/L = neck length to test length. The correction factors of 0.7 and 0.8 are adopted for the compressed neck and chamber, respectively, following Paris et al. (Reference Paris, Miller and Zalasiewicz2015a). Raw data of all the measurements are presented in Supplemental Data 2.

Remarks

The emended Lagenochitina esthonica is restricted to specimens with a relatively short test, which is represented by the holotype of the species established by Eisenack (Reference Eisenack1955). The slender forms with a larger and slender test, represented by the specimens reported by Jenkins (Reference Jenkins1967), are excluded, as are the slender forms reported elsewhere (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1968, Reference Eisenack1976a, Reference Eisenackb; Grahn, Reference Grahn1980; Paris, Reference Paris1981; Grahn et al., Reference Grahn, Nõlvak and Paris1996; Hints and Nõlvak, Reference Hints and Nõlvak2006; Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019). The short forms recovered in the Jägala (Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019, fig. 6G) and Kaldase (Fig. 4.1–4.22) sections share the same morphology, similar test size, and were recovered from the same strata in the same area as the holotype. The two specimens recovered in the Canning Basin, Australia (Combaz and Peniguel, Reference Combaz and Peniguel1972) have a relatively large test size, with lengths of 600 μm and 670 μm, and a stout chamber; however, the distinctive flaring collar cannot be observed. The classification of those two specimens requires further study because no valid esthonica data have been reported in this time interval in the area. The specimen reported by Geng (Reference Geng1984) from the Hunghuayuan Formation at Yichang resembles the general outline of L. esthonica, but lacks the distinctive flaring collar. The specimens recovered in the upper Meitan Formation (Zhen, Reference Zhen1985) share similar outline with the slender form of L. esthonica, but with a significantly smaller size. The specimens reported from the Hungshihyen Formation (Gao, Reference Gao1986) have been re-identified as Lagenochitina obeligis Paris, Reference Paris1981, by Liang et al. (Reference Liang, Wang, Servais, Wu, Nõlvak, Hints, Wei, Gong and Yan2020b). The data reported from the Tulghes Group in Romania (Olaru and Apostoae, Reference Olaru and Apostoae2004; Olaru, Reference Olaru2005; Olaru et al., Reference Olaru, Grasu and Chihaia2011) are pieces and hard to classify based on the images presented. The specimens lacking a distinct flexure with a short neck, such as figure 19B–D in Grahn (Reference Grahn1980), have been revised as Lagenochitina yilingensis by Chen et al. (Reference Chen, Paris, Wang and Zhang2009a). The small specimens recovered from the Hunghuayuan and Meitan formations (Chen and Zhang, Reference Chen and Zhang2005) later were emended as Lagenochitina chongqingensis by Chen in Chen et al., Reference Chen, Zhang and Wang2009b. The specimens reported from the Ningkuo Formation at Yiyang, South China (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Feng, Vandenbroucke, Li and Verniers2013) have the smallest size of L. esthonica, with test lengths that range from 170–224 μm. The image shown in Nowak et al. (Reference Nowak, Servais, Pittet, Vaucher, Akodad, Gaines and Vandenbroucke2016) features a less-flaring collar and ovoid chamber that closely resembles Lagenochitina cf. L. longiformis Obut, Reference Obut1995, recovered in the Leetse Formation in northern Estonia by Hints and Nõlvak (Reference Hints and Nõlvak2006).

Lagenochitina megaesthonica new species, Liang, Nõlvak, and Hints
Figures 4.23–4.32, 5, 6
Reference Jenkins1967

Lagenochitina esthonica; Jenkins, p. 463, pl. 74, figs. 4, 5.

Reference Eisenack1968

Lagenochitina esthonica; Eisenack, p. 156, pl. 29, fig. 25, text-fig. 1.

Reference Downie, Lister, Harris and Fettes1971

Lagenochitina esthonica; Downie et al., p. 21, pl. 1, fig. 17.

Reference Eisenack1976a

Lagenochitina esthonica; Eisenack, p. 186, pl. 2, fig. 1, text-fig. 2.

p Reference Eisenack1976b

Lagenochitina esthonica; Eisenack, figs. 22, 23.

Reference Grahn1980

Lagenochitina esthonica; Grahn, p. 32, fig. 19A.

Reference Paris1981

Lagenochitina esthonica; Paris, p. 248, pl. 10, figs. 15, 20.

Reference Grahn, Nõlvak and Paris1996

Lagenochitina esthonica; Grahn et al., pl. 3, fig. 9.

? Reference Liang2015

Lagenochitina esthonica elongata Liang, p. 145, pl. 11, figs. 10–12.

? Reference Liang, Hints, Luan, Tang, Nõlvak and Zhan2018

Lagenochitina aff. esthonica; Liang et al., fig. 4W.

Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019

Lagenochitina esthonica; Nõlvak et al., pl. 4, fig. 6L, M.

Holotype

Specimen (GIT 833-1, Fig. 5.23) from sample M-13458 (Kunda Regional Stage, middle Darriwilian; Fig. 2), Kaugatuma drill core, western Estonia, with L-Dp-Dc-Lp dimensions of 867-229-116-574 μm.

Paratypes

Figure 5.15 (GIT 833-2) from sample M-13458, Kaugatuma drill core, western Estonia, with L-Dp-Dc-Lp dimensions of 772-288-120-494 μm; Figure 6.23 (GIT 833-3) from sample M-13671, Baldone drill core, Latvia, with L-Dp*-Dc*-Lp dimensions of 964-291-112-598 μm; and Figure 6.26 (GIT 833-4) from sample M-13672, Baldone drill core, Latvia, with L-Dp*-Dc*-Lp dimensions of 1348-365-147-844 μm.

Diagnosis

Large to huge Lagenochitina (441–1288 μm, Fig. 9) with a relatively long cylindrical neck (~18–55% of the test length) ended with extraordinary flaring collar. Chamber elongated ovoid with almost parallel flanks, shoulders not distinct. The length is ~2–6.6 times the chamber diameter.

Figure 9.

Cross plot of the test length and chamber diameter after correction of Lagenochitina esthonica emend. (1) and Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (2). The red, blue, black, and orange symbols represent data from Baldone, Kaldase, Kaugatuma, and Jägala sections, respectively. Different shapes represent data from different samples.

Occurrence

The reported data are mainly from Baltica, Avalonia, and North Gondwana (Fig. 8), including the “Expansus Limestone” (Kunda Regional Stage, lower to middle Darriwilian) of Fjäcka, Dalarna, Sweden (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1955); the Hope Shale (middle Darriwilian) in Shropshire, England (Jenkins, Reference Jenkins1967); the Vaginatum Limestone (Kunda Regional Stage) in Öland, Sweden (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1976a); strata of upper Langevoja to lower Valaste and upper Aluoja regional substages (ca. lower and middle Darriwilian) in Öland, Sweden (Grahn, Reference Grahn1980); the middle part of the Domfront Pissot Formation (ca. middle Darriwilian) in Brittany, France (Paris, Reference Paris1981); strata above the Granby Event in the Kunda Regional Stage in the Granby crater, Sweden (Grahn et al., Reference Grahn, Nõlvak and Paris1996); and the Sillaoru and Pakri formations (lower Darriwilian) at Jägala, Estonia (Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019). The data from South China (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Hints, Luan, Tang, Nõlvak and Zhan2018) require further investigation. In the present study, Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. appears in the uppermost Volkhov to Kunda regional stages at Jägala, and Kunda Reginal Stage at the Kaldase, Kaugatuma, and Baldone sections, corresponding to the upper part of the Dapingian to lower and middle parts of the Darriwilian, Middle Ordovician.

Description

Test large to huge, ranging from 441–1288 μm with an average value of 769 μm in length. Neck clearly differentiated and cylindrical, occupying ~18–55% of the test length, ended with an extraordinary flaring collar. Chamber elongated ovoid to sub-cylindric. The maximum diameter is located at the middle part of the chamber, which is 15–50% of the test length after correction. Flexure broad and shoulders inconspicuous, flanks nearly parallel to slightly swollen, base flat or slightly convex, base margin rounded. Mucron usually present, but with various shapes and size, as in Lagenochitina esthonica emend. Test surface can be smooth or covered by rugose to spongy structures (e.g., Fig. 5.21, 5.22). The rugose and smooth surface can co-occur in one specimen (e.g., Fig. 5.28, 5.29).

Etymology

Referring to the large size and the name Lagenochitina esthonica, under which specimens of the new species previously have been assigned.

Materials

Forty-four specimens were recovered from samples M-2576 and M-4164 from the Jägala section, Estonia; 18 specimens were recovered from samples M-13622 and M-13628 from the Kaldase drill core, Estonia; 75 specimens were recovered from samples M-13447 to M-13458 from the Kaugatuma drill core, Estonia; and 249 specimens were recovered from samples M-13670 and M-13682 from the Baldone drill core, Latvia (Fig. 2).

Dimension

Dimensions (Table 2) are based on 386 specimens, 244 of which are compressed and others are preserved three-dimensionally.

Table 2.

Dimensions of Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. L = test length, Ldp = chamber length, Dp = chamber diameter, Dp* = corrected chamber diameter, Dn = neck diameter, Dn* = corrected neck diameter, Dc = collar diameter, Dc* = corrected collar diameter, L/Dp* = the ratio of the test length to corrected chamber diameter, Dp*/Dn* = corrected chamber diameter to neck diameter, and Ln/L = neck length to test length.. The correction factors of 0.7 and 0.8 are adopted for the compressed neck and chamber, respectively, following Paris et al. (Reference Paris, Miller and Zalasiewicz2015a). Raw data of all the measurements are presented in Supplemental Data 2.

Remarks

Large and slender forms of previously reported Lagenochitina esthonica (Eisenack, Reference Eisenack1968, Reference Eisenack1976a, Reference Eisenackb; Grahn, Reference Grahn1980; Paris, Reference Paris1981; Grahn et al., Reference Grahn, Nõlvak and Paris1996; Hints and Nõlvak, Reference Hints and Nõlvak2006; Nõlvak et al., Reference Nõlvak, Liang and Hints2019). Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. is distinguished by its large test with a flaring collar in all Lagenochitina species. It differs from L. esthonica emend. in its large and slender test (Fig. 9) with a less-distinctive flexure and weak shoulder. The test outline of L. megaesthonica n. sp. resembles Lagenochitina boja Bockelie, Reference Bockelie1980, in slender form with a flaring collar, but differs from the latter in having a more distinct flexure and larger test. Some specimens possessing a very short neck (e.g. Fig. 5.5, 5.6, 5.12) resemble Lagenochitina yilingensis in test morphology. However, considering the small number of such specimens, they are taken to represent intraspecific variation within L. megaesthonica n. sp. in this study. Lagenochitina esthonica elongata and Lagenochitina aff. L. esthonica are adopted for the same material recovered in the uppermost Meitan Formation at Tongzi, Guizhou, South China (Liang, Reference Liang2015; Liang et al., Reference Liang, Hints, Luan, Tang, Nõlvak and Zhan2018). These specimens also share a slender outline and a flaring collar resembling L. megaesthonica n. sp.; however, their test length is shorter, ranging from 434–592 μm, and the collar is less flaring than in typical L. megaesthonica n. sp. Considering that only three specimens have been recovered, a question mark is added in the synonymy list at the present.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Estonian Research Council (PRG836), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972015), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2021306), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB26000000) for providing financial support. Two reviewers, S. de la Puente and an anonymous reviewer, and two editors, E. Currano and G. Nestell, are acknowledged for providing vital comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript. This study is a contribution to the IGCP projects 653 “The Onset of the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event” and 735 “Rocks and the Rise of Ordovician Life."

Data availability statement

Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vmcvdncsx.

References

Achab, A., 1980, Chitinozoaires de l'Arenig inférieur de la Formation de Lévis (Québec, Canada): Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 31, p. 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achab, A., 1986, Assemblages de chitinozoaires dans l'Ordovicien inférieur de l'est du Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 23, p. 682–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achab, A., 1989, Ordovician chitinozoan zonation of Quebec and western Newfoundland: Journal of Paleontology, v. 63, p. 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Shawareb, A., Miller, M., and Vecoli, M., 2017, Late Ordovician (Katian) chitinozoans from northwest Saudi Arabia: biostratigraphic and paleoenvironmental implications: Revue de Micropaléontologie, v. 60, p. 333–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselin, E., Achab, A., and Soufiane, A., 2004, Biostratigraphic significance of lower Paleozoic microfaunas from eastern Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 41, p. 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockelie, T.G., 1978, Comments on chitinozoan classification: Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, v. 58, p. 301–304.Google Scholar
Bockelie, T.G., 1980, Early Ordovician Chitinozoa from Spitsbergen: Palynology, v. 4, p. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, A., 2013, Chitinozoans from the middle Rhuddanian (lower Llandovery, Silurian) ‘hot’ shale in the E1-NC174 core, Murzuq Basin, SW Libya: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 198, p. 62–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X.H., and Zhang, M., 2005, Early Ordovician chitinozoans from the Honghuayuan Formation and lower part of Meitan Formation in Datangkou of Chengkou, Chongqing: Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, v. 44, p. 44–56. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Chen, X.H., Paris, F., Wang, X.F., and Zhang, M., 2009a, Early and Middle Ordovician chitinozoans from the Dapingian type sections, Yichang area, China: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 153, p. 310–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X.H., Zhang, M., and Wang, C.S., 2009b, Ordovician Chitinozoan from South China: Beijing, Geological Publishing House, 218 p.Google Scholar
Cocks, L.R.M., and Torsvik, T.H., 2005, Baltica from the late Precambrian to mid-Palaeozoic times: the gain and loss of a terrane's identity: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 72, p. 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combaz, A., and Peniguel, G., 1972, Étude palynostratigraphique de l'Ordovicien dans quelques sondages du Bassin de Canning (Australie Occidentale): Bulletin du Centre de Recherches Pau-SNPA 6, p. 121–167.Google Scholar
de la Puente, G.S., and Rubinstein, C.V., 2013, Ordovician chitinozoans and marine phytoplankton of the Central Andean Basin, northwestern Argentina: a biostratigraphic and paleobiogeographic approach: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 198, p. 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Puente, G.S., Paris, F., and Vaccari, E., 2020, Latest Ordovician–earliest Silurian chitinozoans from the Puna region, north-western Argentina (Western Gondwana): Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 95, p. 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Weirdt, J., Vandenbroucke, T.R.A., Cocq, J., Russell, C., Davies, J.R., Melchin, M., and Zalasiewicz, J., 2019, Chitinozoan biostratigraphy of the Rheidol Gorge Section, Central Wales, UK: a GSSP replacement candidate for the Rhuddanian-Aeronian boundary: Papers in Palaeontology, v. 6, p. 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downie, C.E.A., Lister, T.R., Harris, A.L., and Fettes, D.J., 1971, A Palynological Investigation of the Dalradian Rocks of Scotland: London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 30 p.Google Scholar
Dronov, A.V., and Rozhnov, S.V., 2007, Climatic changes in the Baltoscandian basin during the Ordovician: sedimentological and palaeontological aspects: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 46, p. 108–113.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1931, Neue Mikrofossilien des baltischen Silurs. I: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 13, p. 74–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1955, Neue Chitinozoen aus dem Silur des Baltikums und dem Devon der Eifel: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 36, p. 311–319.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1959, Neotypen baltischer Silur-Chitinozoen und neue Arten: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, v. 108, p. 1–20.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1968, Über Chitinozoen des baltischen Gebietes: Palaeontographica Abteilung A, p. 137–198.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1972, Beiträge zur Chitinozoen-Forschung: Palaeontographica Abteilung A, p. 117–130.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1976a, Mikrofossilien aus dem Vaginatenkalk von Hälludden, Öland: Palaeontographica Abteilung A, v. 154, p. 181–203.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1976b, Weiterer beitrag zur chitinozoen-Forschung: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, v. 1976, p. 641–652.Google Scholar
Gao, L.D., 1986, Lower Ordovician chitinozoans from Wuding and Luquan, Yunnan Province: Professional Papers of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, v. 18, p. 133–152. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Geng, L.Y., 1984, Chitinozoa from the Fengsiang, Huanghuayuan and Dawan formations of Huanghuachang, Yichang, Hubei, in Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, ed., Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Systemic Boundaries in China: Ordovician-Silurian Boundary: Hefei, Anhui Science and Technology Publishing House, p. 509–516.Google Scholar
Grahn, Y., 1980, Early Ordovician Chitinozoa from Öland: Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, ser. C, v. 775, 41 p.Google Scholar
Grahn, Y., 1984, Ordovician Chitinozoa from Tallinn, northern Estonia: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 43, p. 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahn, Y., 2005a, Silurian and Lower Devonian chitinozoan taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the Trombetas Group, Amazonas Basin, northern Brazil: Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 80, p. 245–276.Google Scholar
Grahn, Y., 2005b, Devonian chitinozoan biozones of western Gondwana: Acta Geologica Polonica, v. 55, p. 211–227.Google Scholar
Grahn, Y., 2006, Ordovician and Silurian chitinozoan biozones of western Gondwana: Geological Magazine, v. 143, p. 509–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahn, Y., and Gutiérrez, P.R, 2001, Silurian and Middle Devonian Chitinozoa from the Zapla and Santa Bárbara ranges, Tarija Basin, northwestern Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 38, p. 35–50.Google Scholar
Grahn, Y., and Nõlvak, J., 2007, Ordovician Chitinozoa and biostratigraphy from Skåne and Bornholm, southernmost Scandinavia—an overview and update: Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 82, p. 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahn, Y., Nõlvak, J., and Paris, F., 1996, Precise chitinozoan dating of Ordovician impact events in Baltoscandia: Journal of Micropalaeontology, v. 15, p. 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hints, O., and Nõlvak, J., 2006, Early Ordovician scolecodonts and chitinozoans from Tallinn, north Estonia: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 139, p. 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, W.A.M., 1967, Ordovician Chitinozoa from Shropshire: Palaeontology, v. 10, p. 436–488.Google Scholar
Liang, Y., 2015, Early–Middle Ordovician Chitinozoans of the Upper Yangtze Region, South China—Systematics, Biostratigraphy and Biodiversity [Ph.D. dissertation]: Nanjing, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 244 p.Google Scholar
Liang, Y., Servais, T., Tang, P., Liu, J., and Wang, W., 2017, Tremadocian (Early Ordovician) chitinozoan biostratigraphy of South China: an update: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 247, p. 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Hints, O., Luan, X.C., Tang, P., Nõlvak, J., and Zhan, R.B., 2018, Lower and Middle Ordovician chitinozoans from Honghuayuan, South China: biodiversity patterns and response to environmental changes: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 500, p. 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Hints, O., Servais, T., Luan, X., Nõlvak, J., Tang, P., and Wu, R., 2019, Palaeoenvironmental and biostratigraphical implications of selected Floian and Dapingian (Ordovician) chitinozoans of the South China Palaeoplate: Lethaia, v. 52, p. 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Hints, O., Tang, P., Cai, C., Goldman, D., Nõlvak, J., Tihelka, E., Pang, K., Bernardo, J., and Wang, W., 2020a, Fossilized reproductive modes reveal a protistan affinity of Chitinozoa: Geology, v. 48, p. 1200–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Wang, G., Servais, T., Wu, R.C., Nõlvak, J., Hints, O., Wei, X., Gong, F.Y., and Yan, G.Z., 2020b, Age constraints of the Hungshihyen Formation (Early to Middle Ordovician) on the western margin of the Yangtze Platform, South China: new insights from chitinozoans: Palaeoworld, v. 29, p. 66–74.Google Scholar
Männil, R., 1966, Evolution of the Baltic Basin during the Ordovician: Tallinn, Valgus, 200 p. [in Russian with English summary].Google Scholar
Nestor, H., and Einasto, R., 1997, Ordovician and Silurian carbonate sedimentation basin, in Raukas, A., and Teedum, E.A., eds., Geology and Mineral Resources of Estonia: Tallinn, Estonian Academy Publishers, p. 19–204.Google Scholar
Nõlvak, J., and Grahn, Y., 1993, Ordovician chitinozoan zones from Baltoscandia: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 79, p. 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nõlvak, J., Liang, Y., and Hints, O., 2019, Early diversification of Ordovician chitinozoans on Baltica: new data from the Jägala waterfall section, northern Estonia: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 525, p. 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, H., Servais, T., Pittet, B., Vaucher, R., Akodad, M., Gaines, R.R., and Vandenbroucke, T.R.A., 2016, Palynomorphs of the Fezouata Shale (Lower Ordovician, Morocco): age and environmental constraints of the Fezouata Biota: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 460, p. 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obut, A.M., 1973, On the geographic distribution, comparative morphology, ecology, phylogeny and systematic position of chitinozoans, in Zhuravleva, J.T., ed., Environment and Life in the Geological Past, Novosibirsk, Scientific Press (Siberian Branch), p. 72–84. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Obut, O.T., 1995, New species of chitinozoans in the Ordovician of Moscow Syneclise: Geologiya i geokhimiya osadochnykh basseynov Sibiri, Novosibirsk, p. 47–53. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Olaru, L., 2005, Some problems of biostratigraphy and palynological correlation of Upper Formation (Tg. 4) from Tulgheş Group, east Carpathians (Romania): Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, v. 5, p. 351–366.Google Scholar
Olaru, L., and Apostoae, L., 2004, Arenigian chitinozoans from the Tulghes Group, Upper Formation (Tg. 4) from Balan Zone, eastern Carpathians, Romania: Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, v. 4, p. 299–314.Google Scholar
Olaru, L., Grasu, C., and Chihaia, M., 2011, Dămuc series of Hăghimaş syncline from east Carpathians, Romania. New petrographical and palynostratigraphical data: Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, v. 7, p. 267–278.Google Scholar
Paris, F., 1981, Les Chitinozoaires dans le Paléozoïque du sud-ouest de l'Europe (cadre géologique—étude systématique-biostratigraphie): Mémoires de la Société géologique et minéralogique de Bretagne, v. 26, 412 p.Google Scholar
Paris, F., 1990, The Ordovician chitinozoan biozones of the Northern Gondwana domain: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 66, p. 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, F., and Mergl, M., 1984, Arenigian chitinozoans from the Klabava Formation, Bohemia: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 43, p. 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, F., Grahn, Y., Nestor, V., and Lakova, I., 1999, A revised chitinozoan classification: Journal of Paleontology, v. 73, p. 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, F., Achab, A., Asselin, E., Chen, X.H., Grahn, Y., Nõlvak, J., Obut, O., Samuelsson, J., Sennikov, N., and Vecoli, M. 2004. Chitinozoans, in Webby, B., Droser, M., Paris, F., and Percival, I. eds., The great Ordovician Biodiversification Event: Columbia University Press, p. 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, F., Miller, M.A., and Zalasiewicz, J., 2015a, Early Silurian chitinozoans from the Qusaiba type area, north central Saudi Arabia: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 212, p. 127–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, F., Verniers, J., Miller, M.A., Melvin, J., and Wellman, C.H., 2015b, Late Ordovician–earliest Silurian chitinozoans from the Qusaiba-1 core hole (north central Saudi Arabia) and their relation to the Hirnantian glaciation: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 212, p. 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team, 2016, R: A language and environment for statistical computing: Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Scotese, C.R., 2016, PALEOMAP PaleoAtlas for GPlates and the PaleoData Plotter Program, PALEOMAP Project. https://www.earthbyte.org/paleomap-paleoatlas-for-gplates/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steemans, P., Le Hérissé, A., Melvin, J., Miller, M.A., Paris, F., Verniers, J., and Wellman, C.H., 2009, Origin and radiation of the earliest vascular land plants: Science, v. 324, p. 353. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenbroucke, T.R.A., 2004, Chitinozoan biostratigraphy of the Upper Ordovician Fågelsång GSSP, Scania, southern Sweden: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 130, p. 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenbroucke, T.R.A., Armstrong, H.A., Williams, M., Paris, F., Zalasiewicz, J.A., Sabbe, K., Nõlvak, J., Challands, T.J., Verniers, J., and Servais, T., 2010, Polar front shift and atmospheric CO2 during the glacial maximum of the Early Paleozoic Icehouse: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 107, p. 14983–14986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenbroucke, T.R.A., Emsbo, P., Munnecke, A., Nuns, N., Duponchel, L., Lepot, K., Quijada, M., Paris, F., Servais, T., and Kiessling, W., 2015, Metal-induced malformations in early Palaeozoic plankton are harbingers of mass extinction: Nature Communications, v. 6, p. 7966. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verniers, J., Nestor, V., Paris, F., Dufka, P., Sutherland, S., and Van Grootel, G., 1995, A global Chitinozoa biozonation for the Silurian: Geological Magazine, v. 132, p. 651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W.H., Feng, H.Z., Vandenbroucke, T.R.A., Li, L.X., and Verniers, J., 2013, Chitinozoans from the Tremadocian graptolite shales of the Jiangnan Slope in South China: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 198, p. 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhen, Y.Y., 1985, The biostratigraphical significance of the chitinozoans from the Meitan Formation at Honghuayuan, northern Guizhou: Scientia Geologica Sinica, v. 20, p. 375–380. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1.Paleogeographic settings of the study area. The four red marks show the localities of the four at Jägala, Kaldase, Kaugatuma, and Baldone on Baltica.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Lithology and biostratigraphical distribution of Lagenochitina esthonica at Jägala, Kaldase, Kaugatuma, and Baldone sections. Red and black range-through occurrence data represent short and slender forms of L. esthonica, respectively. Bill. = Billingen; Glo. = Global; Hunn. = Hunneberg; Reg. = Regional; Pa = Pakerort; Ka = Kallavere. The samples labeled with the beginning “OM” are used to distinguish those samples from those labeled with the beginning “M.” OM refers to the microfossil samples re-collected by Olle Hints and his colleagues in 2018. Other samples were collected in 1969–2014 by other paleontologists.

Figure 2

Figure 3.Histograms and box-plots of the test length (L), chamber diameter after correction (Dp*), and the ratio of L/Dp*. (1–3) Based on all the valid data from the studied sections; (4–6) based on the data from the Jägala waterfall outcrop, Estonia; (7–9) based on the data from Kaldase borehole, Estonia; (10–12) based on the data from Kaugatuma borehole, Estonia; (13–15) based on data from Baldone borehole, Lativa.

Figure 3

Figure. 4.Lagenochitina esthonica emend. (1–22) and Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (23–32) from the Kaldase section, northern Estonia. Each black scale bar on the left boundary of the figure represents 100 μm; the total length of the white background line is 2582 μm. Sample M-13596: (1, 6, 9–11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20–22); Sample M-13597: (2–5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 16, 19); Sample M-13622: (24, 26, 32); Sample M-13627: (25, 27, 31); Sample M-13628: (23, 28–30).

Figure 4

Figure 5.Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (1–31) from the Kaugatuma section, western Estonia. Each black scale bar on the left boundary of the figure represents 100 μm; the total length of the white background line is 3312 μm. All specimens are from Sample M-13458. (23) holotype, with a repository number of GIT 833-1. (15) paratype, with a repository number of GIT 833-2.

Figure 5

Figure 6.Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (1–26) from the Baldone section, central Latvia. Each black scale bar on the left boundary of the figure represents 100 μm; the total length of the white background line is 3584 μm. Sample M-13670: (10–12, 16, 17, 22); M-13671: (9, 23); M-13672: (26); M-13674: (1, 2, 6, 15, 24, 25); M-13676: (3–5, 7, 8, 14, 18, 19); M-13679: (20, 21); M-13682: (13). (23, 26) paratypes, with repository number of GIT 833-3 and GIT 833-4, respectively.

Figure 6

Figure 7.Histograms and box-plots of the test length (L), chamber diameter after correction (Dp*), and the ratio of L/Dp* of emended Lagenochitina esthonica (1–3), short forms and Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (4–6), slender forms.

Figure 7

Figure 8.Paleogeographic distributions of emended Lagenochitina esthonica and Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. in the interval of Floian–Dapingian (1) and Darriwilian (2). Detailed information of the occurrence data marked by numbers is presented in Supplemental Data 1. The paleomaps are according to Scotese (2016).

Figure 8

Table 1.Dimensions of Lagenochitina esthonica emend. L = test length, Ldp = chamber length, Dp = chamber diameter, Dp* = corrected chamber diameter, Dn = neck diameter, Dn* = corrected neck diameter, Dc = collar diameter, Dc* = corrected collar diameter, L/Dp* = the ratio of the test length to corrected chamber diameter, Dp*/Dn* = corrected chamber diameter to neck diameter, and Ln/L = neck length to test length. The correction factors of 0.7 and 0.8 are adopted for the compressed neck and chamber, respectively, following Paris et al. (2015a). Raw data of all the measurements are presented in Supplemental Data 2.

Figure 9

Figure 9.Cross plot of the test length and chamber diameter after correction of Lagenochitina esthonica emend. (1) and Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. (2). The red, blue, black, and orange symbols represent data from Baldone, Kaldase, Kaugatuma, and Jägala sections, respectively. Different shapes represent data from different samples.

Figure 10

Table 2.Dimensions of Lagenochitina megaesthonica n. sp. L = test length, Ldp = chamber length, Dp = chamber diameter, Dp* = corrected chamber diameter, Dn = neck diameter, Dn* = corrected neck diameter, Dc = collar diameter, Dc* = corrected collar diameter, L/Dp* = the ratio of the test length to corrected chamber diameter, Dp*/Dn* = corrected chamber diameter to neck diameter, and Ln/L = neck length to test length.. The correction factors of 0.7 and 0.8 are adopted for the compressed neck and chamber, respectively, following Paris et al. (2015a). Raw data of all the measurements are presented in Supplemental Data 2.