Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-7drmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T12:32:06.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural brain network differences in bipolar disorder using with similarity-based approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2020

Miho Ota*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Disorder Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
Takamasa Noda
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
Noriko Sato
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
Shinsuke Hidese
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Disorder Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
Toshiya Teraishi
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Disorder Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
Hiroshi Matsuda
Affiliation:
Integrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
Hiroshi Kunugi
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Disorder Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Miho Ota, Email: ota@ncnp.go.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have shown differences in the regional brain structure and function between patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy subjects, but little is known about the structural connectivity between BD patients and healthy subjects. In this study, we evaluated the disease-related changes in regional structural connectivity derived from gray matter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Methods: The subjects were 73 patients with BD and 80 healthy volunteers who underwent 3-Tesla MRI. Network metrics, such as the small world properties, were computed. We also performed rendering of the network metric images such as the degree, betweenness centrality, and clustering coefficient, on individual brain image. Then, we estimated the differences between them, and evaluate the relationships between the clinical symptoms and the network metrics in the patients with BD. Results: BD patients showed a lower clustering coefficient in the right parietal region and left occipital region, compared with healthy subjects. A weak negative correlation between Young mania rating scale and clustering coefficient was found in left anterior cingulate cortex. Conclusions: We found differences in gray matter structural connectivity between BD patients and healthy subjects by a similarity-based approach. These points may provide objective biological information as an adjunct to the clinical diagnosis of BD.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2020
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Regional changes of network indices in patients with bipolar disorder. The patients with bipolar disorder showed significant reduction of clustering coefficient, compared with healthy subjects. R is right, and L is left. The background images were ‘avg152T1’ images, which are regarded as anatomically standard images in the SPM8.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Relationship between the network indices and Young mania rating scale in patients with bipolar disorder. There was significant negative correlation between Young mania rating scale and clustering coefficient of left anterior cingulate cortex in the patients with bipolar disorder. R is right, and L is left. The background images were ‘avg152T1’ images, which are regarded as anatomically standard images in the SPM8.